Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 455.2175 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 455.2175 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 455.2175

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 455
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 455.2175
455.2175 Penalty for theft or reproduction of an examination.In addition to, or in lieu of, any other discipline imposed pursuant to s. 455.227, the theft of an examination in whole or in part or the act of reproducing or copying any examination administered by the department, whether such examination is reproduced or copied in part or in whole and by any means, constitutes a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. An examinee whose examination materials are confiscated is not permitted to take another examination until the criminal investigation reveals that the examinee did not violate this section.
History.s. 3, ch. 90-228; s. 3, ch. 91-137; s. 47, ch. 92-33; s. 23, ch. 93-129; s. 71, ch. 94-218; s. 13, ch. 97-261; s. 10, ch. 2010-106.

F.S. 455.2175 on Google Scholar

F.S. 455.2175 on Casetext

Amendments to 455.2175


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 455.2175
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S455.2175 - LARC - THEFT OF EXAM ADMINISTERED BY DEPARTMENT - F: T
S455.2175 - FORGERY - REPRODUCE COPY DEPARTMENT EXAM - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ACSI, INC. d b a v. AAA CONSTRUCTION SCHOOL, INC. M., 650 So. 2d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . The appellant obtained a temporary injunction that was based upon section 455.2175, Florida Statutes . . . The injunction was subsequently dissolved upon the trial court’s finding that § 455.2175 was unconstitutionally . . . order dissolving the injunction, it concedes that it was not entitled to injunctive relief under § 455.2175 . . . Based upon the appellant’s concession, and without addressing the constitutionality of § 455.2175, we . . .