Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 455.2175 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 455.2175 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 455.2175

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 455
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 455.2175
455.2175 Penalty for theft or reproduction of an examination.—In addition to, or in lieu of, any other discipline imposed pursuant to s. 455.227, the theft of an examination in whole or in part or the act of reproducing or copying any examination administered by the department, whether such examination is reproduced or copied in part or in whole and by any means, constitutes a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. An examinee whose examination materials are confiscated is not permitted to take another examination until the criminal investigation reveals that the examinee did not violate this section.
History.—s. 3, ch. 90-228; s. 3, ch. 91-137; s. 47, ch. 92-33; s. 23, ch. 93-129; s. 71, ch. 94-218; s. 13, ch. 97-261; s. 10, ch. 2010-106.

F.S. 455.2175 on Google Scholar

F.S. 455.2175 on Casetext

Amendments to 455.2175


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 455.2175
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S455.2175 - LARC - THEFT OF EXAM ADMINISTERED BY DEPARTMENT - F: T
S455.2175 - FORGERY - REPRODUCE COPY DEPARTMENT EXAM - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 455.2175

Total Results: 1

ACSI, Inc. v. AAA Construction School, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-03-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 650 So. 2d 236, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001

Snippet: temporary injunction that was based upon section 455.2175, Florida Statutes (1991). The injunction was subsequently…dissolved upon the trial court’s finding that § 455.2175 was unconstitutionally overbroad. Although the… was not entitled to injunctive relief under § 455.2175. Based upon the appellant’s concession, and without…without addressing the constitutionality of § 455.2175, we affirm the trial court’s action dissolving