Florida Statute 466.009 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 466
DENTISTRY, DENTAL HYGIENE, AND DENTAL LABORATORIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 466.009

466.009 Reexamination.—

(1) Any person who fails an examination that is required under s. 466.006 or s. 466.007 may retake the examination.

(2) If an applicant for a license to practice dentistry fails the practical or clinical examination because of a failing grade on just one part or procedure tested, she or he shall be required to retake only that part or procedure. However, if any such applicant fails more than one part or procedure of any such examination, she or he shall be required to retake the entire examination.

(3) If an applicant for a license to practice dental hygiene fails one portion of the practical or clinical examination, such applicant shall be required to retake only that portion if she or he reapplies within 12 months. If, however, the applicant fails the prophylaxis, she or he shall be required to retake the entire examination.

History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 79-330; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 23, 24, ch. 86-291; s. 60, ch. 91-137; s. 7, ch. 91-156; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 252, ch. 97-103; s. 14, ch. 2011-95; s. 2, ch. 2024-211.

F.S. 466.009 on Google Scholar

F.S. 466.009 on Casetext

Amendments to 466.009

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 466.009

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 466.009.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 466.009

Total Results: 4

Bach v. Florida State Bd. of Dentistry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-11-30

Citation: 378 So. 2d 34

Snippet: supervision, as that term is defined by Section 466.09(8)[1] and (9)[2], so that it cannot be inferred

Sheppard v. Florida State Board of Dentistry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-03-20

Citation: 369 So. 2d 629, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14377

Snippet: dentist as required by Rule 21G-9.05 and Section 466.09, Florida Statutes (1978), and who were allowed

Erwin v. STATE, DEPT. OF P. & OR, ETC., BD OF DENTISTRY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-10-08

Citation: 320 So. 2d 2

Snippet: supervision or direct supervision, as defined in section 466.09(8) and (9), perform limited auxiliary dental services

Coleman v. Coleman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-10-11

Citation: 191 So. 2d 460

Snippet: at the inception of the defendant corporation. *466 "9. (a) On or about April 3, 1959, the defendant P