Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 8
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-05-09T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 818 So. 2d 466, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 468, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 878, 2002 WL 925366
Snippet: Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells 9 May 2002 818 So. 2d 466, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 468, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 878,
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1976-05-11T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: QUESTION: Is a dentist absolutely limited, under s. 466.27(2), F. S., to two signs, or may he have his name…degree, and other information referred to in s. 466.27(2) next to his office door or on the building, …building? SUMMARY: A dentist is authorized by s. 466.27(2), F. S., to have not more than two unilluminated…which conform to all requirements set forth in s. 466.27, and in addition thereto a dentist may list the… interior or exterior of such building. Section 466.27(2), F. S., provides in pertinent part that: A dentist
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-02-17T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 329 So. 2d 287
Snippet: .2d 421 (Fla.) cert. den. 400 U.S. 994, 91 S.Ct. 466, 27 L.Ed.2d 443. [4] State v. Jones, 204 So.2d 515
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-12-30T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 181 So. 2d 559, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3650
Snippet: , JJ., concur. . § 466.25, F.S.A., 1959. . § 466.27(2) F.S.A., 1961. “A dentist may have not more than
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1965-07-14T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 178 So. 2d 113
Snippet: Pohlman Company v. Easterling (1962) 211 Cal. App.2d 466, 27 Cal. Rptr. 450. And see the cases collected in
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-08-11T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 166 So. 2d 686
Snippet: advertisement contained information prohibited by § 466.27, supra. The address appearing in the newspaper
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-03-31T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 167 So. 18, 123 Fla. 573
Snippet: necessary implication. Merrill v. Jones,106 U.S. 466, 27 L. Ed. 267. The motion to quash the alternative
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1921-05-05T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 81 Fla. 684, 88 So. 623
Snippet: , citing Carroll v. People, 136 Ill. 456, 465, 466, 27 N. E. 18; Rex. v. Hazy, 2. C. & P. 458; State