Florida Statute 472.018 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 472
LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 472.018

472.018 Continuing education.—The department may not renew a license until the licensee submits proof satisfactory to the board that during the 2 years before her or his application for renewal the licensee has completed at least 24 hours of continuing education. The board may provide by rule for continuing education hours carryover for each renewal cycle not to exceed 12 hours.

(1) The board shall adopt rules to establish the criteria for continuing education providers. The rules may provide that up to a maximum of 25 percent of the required continuing education hours may be fulfilled by the performance of pro bono services to the indigent or to underserved populations or in areas of critical need within the state where the licensee practices. The board must require that any pro bono services be approved in advance in order to receive credit for continuing education under this section. The board shall use the standard recognized by the Federal Poverty Income Guidelines produced by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in determining indigency. The board may adopt rules that may provide that a part of the continuing education hours may be fulfilled by performing research in critical need areas or for training leading to advanced professional certification. The board may adopt rules to define underserved and critical need areas. The department shall adopt rules for the administration of continuing education requirements adopted by the board.

(2) The board may provide by rule the method of delivery and criteria that may be used to satisfy continuing education requirements.

(3) The board may prorate the required continuing education hours in the following circumstances:

(a) For new licensees:

1. By requiring half of the required continuing education hours for any applicant who becomes licensed with more than half the renewal period remaining and no continuing education for any applicant who becomes licensed with half or less than half of the renewal period remaining; or

2. Requiring no continuing education hours until the first full renewal cycle of the licensee.

(b) When the number of hours required is increased by law or the board.

(4) Upon the request of a licensee, the provider must also furnish to the department information regarding courses completed by the licensee, in an electronic format required by rule of the department.

(5) Each continuing education provider shall retain all records relating to a licensee’s completion of continuing education courses for at least 4 years after completion of a course.

(6) A continuing education provider may not be approved, and the approval may not be renewed, unless the provider agrees in writing to provide such cooperation under this section as required by the department.

(7) For the purpose of determining which persons or entities must meet the reporting, recordkeeping, and access provisions of this section, the board by rule shall adopt a definition of the term “continuing education provider” applicable to the profession’s continuing education requirements. The intent of the rule is to ensure that all records and information necessary to carry out the requirements of this section are maintained and transmitted accordingly and to minimize disputes as to what person or entity is responsible for maintaining and reporting such records and information.

(8) The board shall approve the providers of continuing education. The approval of continuing education providers must be for a specified period of time, not to exceed 4 years. An approval that does not include such a time limitation may remain in effect under this chapter or the rules adopted under this chapter.

(9) The department may fine, suspend, or revoke approval of any continuing education provider that fails to comply with its duties under this section. The fine may not exceed $500 per violation. Investigations and prosecutions of a provider’s failure to comply with its duties under this section shall be conducted pursuant to s. 472.033.

(10) The board shall issue an order requiring a person or entity to cease and desist from offering any continuing education programs for licensees, and fining, suspending, or revoking any approval of the provider previously granted by the board if the board determines that the person or entity failed to provide appropriate continuing education services. The fine may not exceed $500 per violation. Investigations and prosecutions of a provider’s failure to comply with its duties under this section shall be conducted under s. 472.033.

(11) The board may establish, by rule, a fee not to exceed $250 for anyone seeking approval to provide continuing education courses and may establish, by rule, a biennial fee not to exceed $250 for the renewal of providership of such courses. Such postlicensure education courses are subject to the reporting, monitoring, and compliance provisions of this section.

(12) The department and the board may adopt rules under ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to administer this section.

(13) Each continuing education provider shall provide to the department, in an electronic format determined by the department, information regarding the continuing education status of licensees which the department determines is necessary to carry out its duties under this chapter. After a licensee completes a course, the information must be submitted electronically by the continuing education provider to the department within 30 calendar days after completion. However, beginning on the 30th day before the renewal deadline or before the renewal date, whichever occurs sooner, the continuing education provider shall electronically report such information to the department within 10 business days after completion.

(14) The department shall establish a system to monitor licensee compliance with continuing education requirements and to determine the continuing education status of each licensee. As used in this subsection, the term “monitor” means the act of determining, for each licensee, whether the licensee is in full compliance with applicable continuing education requirements as of the date of the licensee’s application for license renewal.

(15) The department may refuse to renew a license until the licensee has satisfied all applicable continuing education requirements. This subsection does not preclude the department or board from imposing additional penalties pursuant to this chapter or rules adopted pursuant this chapter.

History.—ss. 6, 8, ch. 87-349; ss. 5, 7, ch. 89-137; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 340, ch. 97-103; s. 16, ch. 2009-66; s. 8, ch. 2012-67; s. 6, ch. 2017-85.

F.S. 472.018 on Google Scholar

F.S. 472.018 on Casetext

Amendments to 472.018

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 472.018

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 472.018.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 472.018

Total Results: 20

Ft. Walton Beach Medical Center/Broadspire v. Tara Young

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-07-14

Citation: 223 So. 3d 445, 2017 WL 2989609, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10187

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251, 253 (1944), the Florida Supreme Court

State, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. McGrath

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-12-15

Citation: 774 So. 2d 791, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16332, 2000 WL 1839204

Snippet: Forest and Park Serv. v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251, 253 (1944). It is undisputed here (i)

HRS DIST. II v. Pickard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-10-15

Citation: 778 So. 2d 299, 1999 WL 503456

Snippet: Florida Forest & Park Serv. v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251, 253 (1944). We choose to write on this

Rucker v. City of Ocala

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-12-05

Citation: 684 So. 2d 836, 1996 WL 708614

Snippet: Florida Forest & Park Serv. v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251, 254 (1944) ("A right to compensation

Mosher v. SPEEDSTAR DIV. OF AMCA

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-06-27

Citation: 675 So. 2d 918, 1996 WL 350166

Snippet: Forest & Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944), applied to certain plaintiffs

Woodley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-08

Citation: 673 So. 2d 127, 1996 WL 229118

Snippet: Forest and Park Serv. v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251, 253 (Fla.1944); City of Daytona Beach

Hogan v. Tavzel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-08

Citation: 660 So. 2d 350, 1995 WL 525665

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944); National Insurance Underwriters

City of Miami v. Bell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-03-03

Citation: 634 So. 2d 163, 1994 WL 61399

Snippet: Forest & Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944). We note that our rulings in Martinez

Florida Elks Children's Hospital v. Stanley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-04

Citation: 610 So. 2d 538, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12121, 1992 WL 355045

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944) requires that the statute should

City of Daytona Beach v. Amsel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-08-30

Citation: 585 So. 2d 1044, 1991 WL 167318

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251, 253 (1944); Department of Revenue v

Shaw v. Charter Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-03-26

Citation: 576 So. 2d 907, 1991 WL 39324

Snippet: judgment of foreclosure was in the amount of $591,472.18 for real property, and $81,460.64 for personal

Frazier v. Baker Material Handling Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-01-18

Citation: 559 So. 2d 1091, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 33, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 149, 1990 WL 59407

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944), and applied in National Insurance

Spleen v. Rogers Group, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-08-24

Citation: 548 So. 2d 740, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1993, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4758, 1989 WL 97713

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (Fla.1944), the supreme court ruled that

Frazier v. Baker Material Handling Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-21

Citation: 540 So. 2d 205, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 731, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1442, 1989 WL 24043

Snippet: Forest and Park Serv. v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944): To this rule, however, there

Lowell v. Singer Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-07-01

Citation: 528 So. 2d 60, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1539, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2883, 1988 WL 68084

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944), said: In the instant case Brackenridge

National Insurance Underwriters v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-02-11

Citation: 522 So. 2d 53, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 431, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 531

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (Fla.1944): To this rule, however, there

NAT. INS. UNDERWRITERS v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-02-11

Citation: 522 So. 2d 53

Snippet: Forest and Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (Fla. 1944): To this rule, however, there

Brackenridge v. Ametek, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-03

Citation: 517 So. 2d 667, 1987 WL 2368

Snippet: Forest & Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944), in which a workers' compensation

Hampton v. A. Duda & Sons, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-09-03

Citation: 511 So. 2d 1104, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2124, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10326

Snippet: Forest & Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944). The Pullum decision was silent

Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Phlieger

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-05-28

Citation: 508 So. 2d 713, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 256, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1923

Snippet: Forest & Park Service v. Strickland, 154 Fla. 472, 18 So.2d 251 (1944), this Court applied the exception