Syfert Injury Law Firm

Rollas v. Dept. of Business & Professional Reg.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-01-28T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: amount recoverable under the statute. See § 475.484(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). His claim was limited to

Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 14-488 Re: Kimberly Michele Shepard

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 71, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 528, 2017 WL 1739233, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 982

Snippet: finance violations. In re Renke, 933 So.2d at 484. In one campaign brochure in particular, the judge intentionally

Chin v. CAIAFFA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-08-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 42 So. 3d 300, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11287, 2010 WL 3023297

Snippet: action or defense." Juhasz v. Barton, 146 Fla. 484, 1 So.2d 476, 478 (1941) (quoting An Automobile Accident

Youngblood v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 9 So. 3d 717, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3445, 2009 WL 1066290

Snippet: trafficking in methamphetamine in case number 06-CF-000484.[1] The judgment *719 and sentence were entered after

Bidon v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION, FLA. REAL ESTATE COMM.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-03-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 596 So. 2d 450

Snippet: .482(2). Unlike subsection 475.484(1)(a), however, subsection 475.484(1)(b) does not limit reimbursement…order, held that the restriction in subsection 475.484(1)(a) limiting reimbursement to those amounts "…4] The 1980 amendment also added subsection 475.484(1)(b)[5] to address the limits of recovery under subsection…KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 475.484(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). The subsection read as follows…[.] [2] The legislature amended subsection 475.484(1)(a), effective October 1, 1988, to add the express

US Shoe Corp. v. DEPT. OF PRO. REG.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-04-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 578 So. 2d 376

Snippet: the practice of opticianry. According to Section 484.001, the purpose of the statute and the rules implementing

United States Shoe Corp. v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Opticianry

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-04-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 578 So. 2d 376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3801

Snippet: the practice of opticianry. According to Section 484.001, the purpose of the statute and the rules implementing

Walker v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-10-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 495 So. 2d 1240

Snippet: in his case-in-chief. Juhasz v. Barton, 146 Fla. 484, 1 So.2d 476 (1941); Spaziano v. State, 429 So.2d

Fla. Medical Ass'n v. Dept. of Prof. Regulation

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-02-01T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 426 So. 2d 1112

Snippet: declaration that its members were authorized by Section 484.01, Florida Statutes (1967) to prepare and fit contact

Castlewood International Corporation v. LaFleur

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1975-10-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 322 So. 2d 520

Snippet: opening statements, Juhasz v. Barton, 146 Fla. 484, 1 So.2d 476 (1941); Woods v. State, 154 Fla. 203,

Canterbury School, Inc. v. Miami Beach First National Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-05-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 312 So. 2d 493, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14972

Snippet: Greater Miami, Inc. v. Jordan, Fla.1974, 290 So.2d 484; 1 Williston on Contracts, Rev.Ed.1936, § 116.

Florida Ass'n of Dispensing Opticians v. Florida State Board of Optometry

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1970-07-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 238 So. 2d 839, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2691

Snippet: sell contact lenses pursuant to Florida Statute 484.01, but a dispensing optician has no statutory right

Florida Ass'n of Dispensing Opticians v. Florida State Board of Optometry

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-10-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 227 So. 2d 736, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5175

Snippet: contrary, by clear implication from .the language of § 484.01, dispensing opticians are authorized not only to… also to fit and adjust contact lenses. Section 484.01 includes a clause which prohibits “the sale of …board of dispensing opticians.” That clause of § 484.01, by indirection, authorizes the sale of such items…adjusting optical devices is in the last sentence of § 484.01, viz: “Natural persons, partnerships or corporations

Rawls v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-05-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 210 So. 2d 13, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5500

Snippet: on the authority of Juhasz v. Barton, 146 Fla. 484, 1 So.2d 476; State v. McCall, Fla.App.1966, 186 So

Lashley v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1953-10-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 67 So. 2d 648

Snippet: be the final arbiter. Juhasz v. Barton, 146 Fla. 484, 1 So.2d 476; Louisville & N.R. Co. v. English

City of St. Petersburg v. Siebold

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1950-10-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 48 So. 2d 291

Snippet: 25255, Acts of 1949, Laws of Florida, F.S.A. § 484.01 et seq., is viz.: "An Act Creating a Board…Section 13 of Chapter 25255, Acts of 1949, F.S.A. § 484.01 note, is viz.: "Chapter 21769, Laws of Florida

Perper v. Edell

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1948-05-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 35 So. 2d 387, 160 Fla. 477, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 772

Snippet: confessedly innocent person, instead *Page 484 of on the one who received and used the article delivered

Orme v. Burr Burch v. Burr

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1946-05-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 25 So. 2d 870, 157 Fla. 378, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 751

Snippet: 685, 131 A.L.R. 886; Juhasz v. Barton, 146 Fla. 484,1 So. 2-476; Cormier v. Williams, 148 Fla. 201, 4

Wharton, Jr. v. Day

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1942-11-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 10 So. 2d 417, 151 Fla. 772, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1265

Snippet: Fla. 201, 4 So.2d 525; Juhasz v. Barton,146 Fla. 484, 1 So.2d 476; Koger v. Hollahan, 144 Fla. 779,198