Cases from cite.case.law:

JAX UTILITIES MANAGEMENT, INC. v. HANCOCK BANK, A LLC, A, 164 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Stat. (2011) (“Sections 494.001-494.0077 do not limit any statutory or common-law right of any person . . .

F. IERACITANO, a v. D. SHAW, P. A., 815 So. 2d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . was required because the section contained the phrase “[notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 494.001-494.0077 . . . Section 494.001 commences with the phrase “[a]s used in ss. 494.001-494.0077,” indicating that the section . . . ’s 29 definitions are to be applied through section 494.0077, including section 494.00421. . . . section 494.00421 as precluding the application of any contrary substantive provision of sections 494.001-494.0077 . . .

CARLTON PALMS HOTEL, INC. v. FIDELITY TRUST, INC., 728 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 494.001-494.0077, any mortgage brokerage business which contracts . . .