Florida Statute 500.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 500
FOOD PRODUCTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 500.02

500.02 Purpose of chapter.—This chapter is intended to:

(1) Safeguard the public health and promote the public welfare by protecting the consuming public from injury by product use and the purchasing public from injury by merchandising deceit, flowing from intrastate commerce in food;

(2) Provide legislation which shall be uniform, as provided in this chapter, and administered so far as practicable in conformity with the provisions of, and regulations issued under the authority of, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Agriculture Marketing Act of 1946; and likewise uniform with the Federal Trade Commission Act, to the extent that it expressly prohibits the false advertisement of food; and

(3) Promote thereby uniformity of such state and federal laws and their administration and enforcement throughout the United States and in the several states.

History.—s. 1, ch. 19656, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(665); s. 3, ch. 82-225; s. 2, ch. 87-388.

F.S. 500.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 500.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 500.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 500.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 500.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 500.02

Total Results: 20

IRVING D. RIVERA v. ANGELICA MARIE RIVERA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-02

Snippet: purchased a used vehicle worth $12,500 2 for his own use, after the Wife

In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.215

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-05-12

Snippet: Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 -2- It is so ordered. CANADY

KEVIN BARONOWSKY v. CARLO PONTI MAIORANO n/k/a CARLO PONTI

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-08-18

Snippet: Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499, 500–02 (Fla. 1989); Astro Aluminum Treating Co., Inc.

IMPERIAL CAPITAL, LLC v. TRADEWINDS, LTD. a/k/a TRADEWINDS LTD. CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-28

Snippet: Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499, 500-02 (Fla. 1989). This case involves general, rather

Francis-Harbin v. Sensormatic Electronics

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-25

Citation: 254 So. 3d 523

Snippet: entered final judgment awarding Francis-Harbin $16,500.2 This appeal follows. ANALYSIS

Chuchian v. Situs Investments, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-02

Citation: 219 So. 3d 992, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7975, 2017 WL 2389988

Snippet: to increase the credit line to up to $90,500. 2 After a chain of assignments of the original

Fortunoff v. Morris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-20

Citation: 197 So. 3d 128, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11098, 2016 WL 3913595

Snippet: of temporary alimony in the monthly amount of $7,500.2 Thus, we affirm, without discussion, the award of

NS v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-05-12

Citation: 36 So. 3d 776, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6545, 2010 WL 1875624

Snippet: tolerance” that placed the child “at risk.” Id. at 500-02. Unlike the case before us, the mother in A.W.

Harris v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-05

Citation: 37 So. 3d 285, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2686, 2010 WL 743952

Snippet: Evidence2009 Courtroom Manual Chapter 803(4), at 500-02 (2009). It does not apply to allow the victim to

Flaxman v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-29

Citation: 993 So. 2d 597, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16782, 2008 WL 4722976

Snippet: ----- $10,000 Wage Loss $ 6,000 $ 8,500 $2,500 --------------------------------------

AC HOLDINGS 2006, INC. v. McCarty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-28

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1123, 2008 WL 2185317

Snippet: already obtained insurance in the amount of $1,122,500; (2) they had granted an extension in their June 6

L.D.G. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-02-21

Citation: 960 So. 2d 767, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2431

Snippet: that she, as the insured, paid the deductible of $500.2 She elaborated that *768she personally “handed over

LDG v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-02-21

Citation: 960 So. 2d 767, 2007 WL 517490

Snippet: that she, as the insured, paid the deductible of $500.[2] She elaborated that *768 she personally "handed

Amendments to Fl. Bar-Rules 3-5.2 and 3-7.2

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-29

Citation: 933 So. 2d 498, 2006 WL 1766788

Snippet: or interim probation entered under this rule. *500 (2) The referee shall hear such motion within 7 days

Rodriguez v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-01-19

Citation: 919 So. 2d 1252, 2005 WL 1243475

Snippet: unconstitutional. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 497, 500. [2] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [3]

Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-02-25

Citation: 912 So. 2d 595, 2005 WL 433143

Snippet: court in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500). 2. LeRoy H. Merkle, Jr., shall pay all costs of the

Turner Greenberg Associates v. Pathman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-11-03

Citation: 885 So. 2d 1004, 2004 WL 2453905

Snippet: that (1) the number of class members exceeded 500; (2) common questions of law and fact predominated

Krafchuk v. Krafchuk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-03

Citation: 804 So. 2d 376, 2001 WL 1188945

Snippet: IRA$26,000 and furniture and personalty of $2,500. [2] Section 61.075(1), Florida Statutes, provides:

Centro Nautico v. INTERN. MARINE CO-OP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-14

Citation: 719 So. 2d 967

Snippet: enforcement of oral contracts for goods in excess of $500[2] and by the general statute of frauds barring enforcement

Hudlett v. Sanderson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-07-29

Citation: 715 So. 2d 1050, 1998 WL 422270

Snippet: complaint alleged that the principal balance was $33,500. [2] The Coventry Note and the Ft. Myers note each