Florida Statute 501.212 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 501
CONSUMER PROTECTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 501.212

501.212 Application.—This part does not apply to:

(1) An act or practice required or specifically permitted by federal or state law.

(2) Except as provided in s. 501.2041, a publisher, broadcaster, printer, or other person engaged in the dissemination of information or the reproduction of printed or pictorial matter, insofar as the information or matter has been disseminated or reproduced on behalf of others without actual knowledge that it violated this part.

(3) A claim for personal injury or death or a claim for damage to property other than the property that is the subject of the consumer transaction.

(4) Any person or activity regulated under laws administered by:

(a) The Office of Insurance Regulation of the Financial Services Commission;

(b) Banks, credit unions, and savings and loan associations regulated by the Office of Financial Regulation of the Financial Services Commission;

(d) Any person or activity regulated under the laws administered by the former Department of Insurance which are now administered by the Department of Financial Services.

(5) Any activity regulated under laws administered by the Florida Public Service Commission.

(6) An act or practice involving the sale, lease, rental, or appraisal of real estate by a person licensed, certified, or registered pursuant to chapter 475, which act or practice violates s. 475.42 or s. 475.626.

(7)(a) Causes of action pertaining to commercial real property located in this state if the parties to the action executed a written lease or contract that expressly provides for the process of resolution of any dispute and the award of damages, attorney’s fees, and costs, if any; or

(b) Causes of action concerning failure to maintain real property if the Florida Statutes:

1. Require the owner to comply with applicable building, housing, and health codes;

2. Require the owner to maintain buildings and improvements in common areas in a good state of repair and maintenance and maintain the common areas in a good state of appearance, safety, and cleanliness; and

3. Provide a cause of action for failure to maintain the real property and provide legal or equitable remedies, including the award of attorney’s fees.

However, this subsection does not affect any action or remedy concerning residential tenancies covered under part II of chapter 83, nor does it prohibit the enforcing authority from maintaining exclusive jurisdiction to bring any cause of action authorized under this part.

History.—s. 1, ch. 73-124; s. 7, ch. 79-386; s. 13, ch. 93-38; s. 7, ch. 2001-39; s. 28, ch. 2001-214; s. 565, ch. 2003-261; s. 13, ch. 2004-390; s. 1, ch. 2017-190; s. 5, ch. 2021-32.

F.S. 501.212 on Google Scholar

F.S. 501.212 on CourtListener

Amendments to 501.212

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 501.212

Total Results: 65

Rollins, Inc. v. Heller

454 So. 2d 580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1984 | Docket: 2510125

Cited 108 times | Published

was the subject of the consumer transaction. § 501.212(3). We find that the subject of the consumer transaction

City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.

488 F. Supp. 1258, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9264, 1980 WL 579692

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1980 | Docket: 2553486

Cited 42 times | Published

The Cities respond that the exemption in Section 501.212 is not applicable to the claims at bar because

Delgado v. JW COURTESY PONT. GMC-TRUCK

693 So. 2d 602, 1997 WL 125902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1997 | Docket: 435042

Cited 34 times | Published

injury or death or damage to other property. § 501.212(3). The legislature specifically defined the type

T.W.M. v. American Medical System, Inc.

886 F. Supp. 842, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7231, 1995 WL 319071

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1995 | Docket: 2448242

Cited 29 times | Published

is the subject of the consumer transaction" [§ 501.212(3) Fla.Stat. (1993)], the defendant's motion to

Jovine v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

795 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 74 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 298, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39702, 2011 WL 1376029

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2011 | Docket: 2024752

Cited 21 times | Published

subject of the consumer transaction." Fla. Stat. § 501.212(3). Plaintiff, therefore, has failed to state

State of Fla., Office of Atty. v. Tenet Healthcare

420 F. Supp. 2d 1288, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41107

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2005 | Docket: 162786

Cited 19 times | Published

747 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (quoting Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1)); see also Eirman v. Olde Disc. Corp., 697

WS Badcock Corp. v. Myers

696 So. 2d 776, 1996 WL 720607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1996 | Docket: 1696151

Cited 19 times | Published

regulated by the Department of Insurance, see § 501.212(4), Fla.Stat.; and (3) the TILA does not prohibit

Sreenivasan Asokan, Chakravarthy Raghavan, Nanni Pidikiti, Rakesh Parekh, Ram Reddy, Madhubala Reddy, Rodger Lodge, Anuradha Asokan, Indep. Anesthesia Servs., P.A. v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co.

302 F. Supp. 3d 1303

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2017 | Docket: 64318018

Cited 17 times | Published

Department of Financial Services." Fla. Stat. § 501.212(4)(d). Because there is no dispute that American

State v. Commerce Commercial Leasing, LLC

946 So. 2d 1253, 2007 WL 187691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 2516410

Cited 16 times | Published

found that appellees were exempt from the Act. Section 501.212, Florida Statutes, provides: This part does

Klinger v. Weekly World News, Inc.

747 F. Supp. 1477, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13665, 1990 WL 153997

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 962950

Cited 16 times | Published

Stat. § 501.212(3) prevents the plaintiff from alleging a violation of the Act. Section 501.212(3) states

Bryant Heating & Air Conditioning Corp. v. Carrier Corp.

597 F. Supp. 1045, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22266

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1984 | Docket: 2516959

Cited 16 times | Published

involves a "consumer transaction", Fla.Stat. Ann. § 501.212(3), and, this Court further recognized that Florida

Zarrella v. Pacific Life Insurance

755 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119552, 2010 WL 4663296

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 273184

Cited 14 times | Published

Plaintiffs bring no argument in response. FDUTPA § 501.212 states, "This part does not apply to ... (4) Any

Extraordinary Title Services, LLC v. Florida Power & Light Co.

1 So. 3d 400, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1041, 2009 WL 321581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 60224879

Cited 13 times | Published

utility imposes on customers; and pursuant to section 501.212, Florida Statutes (2006), FDUTPA does not apply

Bowe v. Public Storage

106 F. Supp. 3d 1252, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71088, 2015 WL 3440418

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 19, 2015 | Docket: 64302170

Cited 12 times | Published

Department of Financial Services.” Fla. Stat. § 501.212. “Florida courts resolve questions about the applicability

Dorestin v. Hollywood Imports, Inc.

45 So. 3d 819, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12337, 2010 WL 3154848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2010 | Docket: 60296072

Cited 10 times | Published

is the subject of the consumer transaction.” § 501.212(3), Fla. Stat. (2008). FDUTPA does not define

Larach v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd.

724 F. Supp. 2d 1228, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73105, 2010 WL 2812687

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2010 | Docket: 2335058

Cited 10 times | Published

Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), § 501.212, Fla. Stat., because they "[m]isrepresented the

Williams v. Edelman

408 F. Supp. 2d 1261, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39240, 2006 WL 45902

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2005 | Docket: 2433150

Cited 10 times | Published

subject of the consumer transaction." Fla. Stat. § 501.212(3). In the past, courts had strictly construed

Marshall v. W & L ENTERPRISES CORP.

360 So. 2d 1147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1978 | Docket: 1474245

Cited 10 times | Published

liable for appellants' attorney's fees because Section 501.212(5) of the Act provides that the Act does not

Schauer v. Morse Operations, Inc.

5 So. 3d 2, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2009 WL 18674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2009 | Docket: 429843

Cited 9 times | Published

consumer may recover "actual damages" but section 501.212(3) explains that FDUTPA does not apply to a

Sundance Apartments I, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.

581 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99459, 2008 WL 4507506

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 6, 2008 | Docket: 1169010

Cited 9 times | Published

action, and because the claim is barred by Section 501.212, Florida Statutes, and by the applicable statute

Bankers Trust Co. v. Basciano

960 So. 2d 773, 2007 WL 1514226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2007 | Docket: 1404854

Cited 9 times | Published

regulated by the state or the federal government. See § 501.212(4), Fla. Stat. (2004). While recognizing that

Wilson v. Eyerbank, N.A.

77 F. Supp. 3d 1202, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8315

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2015 | Docket: 64299804

Cited 8 times | Published

regulated by federal agencies.” See Fla. Stat. § 501.212(4)(c); Sovereign Bonds Exch. LLC v. Fed. Republic

Marty v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC

43 F. Supp. 3d 1333, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124180, 2014 WL 4388415

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2014 | Docket: 64297021

Cited 8 times | Published

permitted by federal or state law.” Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). The New York statute states that: In any such

Degutis v. Financial Freedom, LLC

978 F. Supp. 2d 1243, 2013 WL 5705438, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150086

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2013 | Docket: 65994952

Cited 8 times | Published

permitted by federal or state law.” Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). Defendants argue that this Count must be dismissed

Eirman v. Olde Discount Corp.

697 So. 2d 865, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5646, 1997 WL 269174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1997 | Docket: 1776622

Cited 8 times | Published

Trade Practices Act (the "Little FTC Act"). Section 501.212(1) exempts from its coverage "an act or practice

Rodriguez v. Recovery Performance & Marine, LLC

38 So. 3d 178, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6917, 2010 WL 1979286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2010 | Docket: 2409863

Cited 7 times | Published

by the consumer." Urling, 468 So.2d at 454. Section 501.212(3), Florida Statutes (2009), further provides

Caban v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

606 F. Supp. 2d 1361, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32768, 2009 WL 890392

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2009 | Docket: 2027458

Cited 7 times | Published

Inc., 2007 WL 220172, at *9 (citing Fla. Stat. § 501.212(4)). Thus, there is no support for her contention

Fojtasek v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.

613 F. Supp. 2d 1351, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42605, 2009 WL 1307956

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 11, 2009 | Docket: 2026958

Cited 6 times | Published

claim for personal injury or death. Fla. Stat. § 501.212(3); see also Schauer v. Morse Operations, Inc

State v. Beach Blvd Automotive, Inc.

139 So. 3d 380, 2014 WL 2040853, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2014 | Docket: 60241087

Cited 5 times | Published

administered by the Department of Financial Services.” § 501.212(4)(a), (d), Fla. Stat. (2011). Florida courts

Guerrero v. Target Corp.

889 F. Supp. 2d 1348, 2012 WL 3812324, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125055

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2012 | Docket: 65984643

Cited 5 times | Published

permitted by federal or state law.” Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). In Prohias v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

3B TV, INC. v. State, Office of Atty. Gen.

794 So. 2d 744, 2001 WL 1110559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2001 | Docket: 1473403

Cited 5 times | Published

committed an unfair act or practice under section 501.212, Florida Statutes (1997), the Florida Deceptive

Antoine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

662 F. Supp. 2d 1318, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70799, 2009 WL 2496290

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2009 | Docket: 2292982

Cited 4 times | Published

to dismiss (Doc. 54). Pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 501.212(4)(d), the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Practices

Dolan v. Jetblue Airways Corp.

385 F. Supp. 3d 1338

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 64324885

Cited 3 times | Published

Services" bars Dolan's FDUTPA claim. Fla. Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) & (d). Once again the parties obscure the

In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice Litigation

955 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 81 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 189, 2013 WL 3830124, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105830

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 65992519

Cited 3 times | Published

Ark.Code Ann. § 4-88-101(1) & (3); Fla Stat. § 501.212(1); 815 Ill. Stat. 505/10b(1); Cel-Tech Commc’ns

Transamerica Corp. v. MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, LLC

672 F. Supp. 2d 1353, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114973, 2009 WL 4715853

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2009 | Docket: 2155529

Cited 3 times | Published

specifically permitted by federal ... law.' Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). Thus, to the extent the ACPA recognizes registrar

Prohias v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS

958 So. 2d 1054, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2007 | Docket: 1414415

Cited 3 times | Published

Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1), because the promotional and advertising activity

Prohias v. Pfizer, Inc.

490 F. Supp. 2d 1228, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44465, 2007 WL 1682515

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 29, 2007 | Docket: 2473447

Cited 3 times | Published

747 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (quoting Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1)); see also Eirman v. Olde Disc. Corp., 697

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Health & Wellness Servs., Inc.

389 F. Supp. 3d 1137

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2018 | Docket: 64325239

Cited 2 times | Published

Wellness argues that, under Florida Statutes section 501.212(4)(a), State Farm, as an insurer, is precluded

Gustafsson v. Aid Auto Brokers, Inc.

212 So. 3d 405, 2017 WL 362579, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2017 | Docket: 60263362

Cited 2 times | Published

by the Department of Financial Services. See § 501.212(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2015) (stating that FDUTPA

Morgan v. Pub. Storage

301 F. Supp. 3d 1237

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 64317935

Cited 2 times | Published

Department of Financial Services." Fla. Stat. § 501.212. Public Storage also asserted that Latman and

Martorella v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

161 F. Supp. 3d 1209, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178151, 2015 WL 10857398

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2015 | Docket: 64306836

Cited 2 times | Published

statutory exemption set out in Florida Statute Section 501.212(4)(a) precludes Plaintiffs from pursuing a

Montero ex rel. W.P.M. v. Duval County School Board

153 So. 3d 407, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20565, 2014 WL 7184294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 60245243

Cited 2 times | Published

specifically permitted by federal or state law.” § 501.212(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). The Board’s completing

Combe v. Flocar Investment Group Corp.

977 F. Supp. 2d 1301, 2013 WL 5568726, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147274

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2013 | Docket: 65994832

Cited 2 times | Published

consumer transaction.” Id. (quoting Fla. Stat. § 501.212(3)). None of these circumstances are present in

Sanchez v. AN Luxury Imports of Pembroke Pines, Inc.

216 So. 3d 723, 2017 WL 1364000, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2017 | Docket: 60265474

Cited 1 times | Published

by the Department of Financial Services. See § 501.212(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2015) (stating that FDUT-PA

Phelps v. Hormel Foods Corp.

244 F. Supp. 3d 1312, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45598

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2017 | Docket: 64313489

Cited 1 times | Published

specifically permitted under federal law. See Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). .When FSIS reviews and approves, product labels

Krzykwa v. Campbell Soup Co.

946 F. Supp. 2d 1370, 2013 WL 2319330, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74749

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2013 | Docket: 65991400

Cited 1 times | Published

under the safe harbor provision of Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). Finally, Defendant argues that Plaintiffs

Taylor v. Homecomings Financial, LLC

738 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100533, 2010 WL 3637566

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2010 | Docket: 2336164

Cited 1 times | Published

that conform with federal law. See Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1) (stating that FDUTPA does not apply to an "act

Taylor v. Homecomings Financial, LLC

738 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100533, 2010 WL 3637566

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2010 | Docket: 2336164

Cited 1 times | Published

that conform with federal law. See Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1) (stating that FDUTPA does not apply to an "act

Sewell v. D'Alessandro & Woodyard, Inc.

655 F. Supp. 2d 1228, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82598, 2009 WL 2913505

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2009 | Docket: 890565

Cited 1 times | Published

the claims are statutorily *1259 precluded by § 501.212(6), which excludes the application of FDUTPA to

Fields v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

751 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130126, 2009 WL 7115134

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 2337666

Cited 1 times | Published

for personal injury or death...." Fla. Stat. § 501.212(3)(2008). In his memorandum, Plaintiff does not

Paraiso CU-1, LLC v. PRH Paraiso Four, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2025 | Docket: 70260653

Published

closing tactics and size representations. Section 501.212(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), exempts commercial

Uri Marrache v. Bacardi U.S.A., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 8, 2021 | Docket: 60804289

Published

permitted by federal or state law. See Fla. Stat. § 501.212. Second, even if the FDUTPA claims did not fall

BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., etc. v. LAURA BUGLIARO, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2021 | Docket: 59819913

Published

specifically permitted by federal or state law.” § 501.212(1), Fla. Stat. A merchant, such as BJ’s, is statutorily

Meghan Hotchkiss v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2019 | Docket: 16049252

Published

FDUTPA precluded Ms. Hotchkiss’s FDUTPA claim. Section 501.212(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), states that

WILLIAM STANKOS and JOANNE STANKOS v. AMATEUR ATHLETIC UNION OF THE UNITED STATES, INC.

255 So. 3d 377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 7863689

Published

excludes claims for personal injury or death. § 501.212(3), Fla. Stat. (2013).

Brexendorf v. Bank of Am., N.A.

319 F. Supp. 3d 1257

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2018 | Docket: 64319485

Published

associations regulated by federal agencies." Fla. Stat. § 501.212(4)(c). Contrary to BOA's argument (id. at 22)

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Medical Service Center of Florida, Inc.

103 F. Supp. 3d 1343, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60584, 2015 WL 2170396

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 8, 2015 | Docket: 64301922

Published

statutory exemption set out in Florida Statutes Section 501.212(4)(a) precludes State Farm from pursuing a

NJN Systems, Inc. v. Sunoco, Inc.

95 F. Supp. 3d 1330, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27026, 2015 WL 997864

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2015 | Docket: 64301256

Published

specifically permitted by federal or state law. See § 501.212(1) Fla. Stat. Because the complained of activity

Greenfield v. Yucatan Foods, L.P.

18 F. Supp. 3d 1371, 2014 WL 1891140, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65958

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 2014 | Docket: 64294896

Published

permitted by federal or state law.” Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1) (FDUTPA’s “safe harbor” provision). On the

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Physicians Group of Sarasota, L.L.C.

9 F. Supp. 3d 1303, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40339, 2014 WL 1236240

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2014 | Docket: 64294074

Published

broad” concept of liability under FDUTPA). Section 501.212(4)(a), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny

Ford Motor Co. v. O.E. Wheel Distributors, LLC

868 F. Supp. 2d 1350, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51398, 2012 WL 1231877

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2012 | Docket: 65982207

Published

permitted by federal or state law.” Fla. Stat. § 501.212(1). To the extent that OEW’s actions are found

Sovereign Bonds Exchange LLC v. Federal Republic of Germany

899 F. Supp. 2d 1304, 2010 WL 8971148, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143664

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2010 | Docket: 65985722

Published

associations regulated by federal agencies____” Fla. Stat. 501.212(4)(c); see also Bankers Trust Co. v. Basciano

Florida Power & Light Co. v. FEO

24 So. 3d 737, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20043, 2009 WL 4927938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 391962

Published

jurisdiction to entertain the FDUTPA claims. Section 501.212(5), Florida Statutes (2009), creates a specific

Sonic Automotive, Inc. v. Galura

961 So. 2d 961, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6109, 2007 WL 1201595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 64851575

Published

individuals cannot seek relief under FDUTPA. Section 501.212(4), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that

National Alcoholism Programs/Cooper City, Florida, Inc. v. Palm Springs Hospital Employee Benefit Plan

825 F. Supp. 299, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8710, 1993 WL 221181

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1993 | Docket: 65984907

Published

Florida Public Service Commission....” • Fla.Stat. § 501.212(5).7 Second, the Florida statute fails to meet