Florida Statute 506.22 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 506
STAMPED OR MARKED CONTAINERS AND BASKETS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 506.22

506.22 Transfer, release, or sale of registered mark or brand.—The owner of any such registered mark or brand may transfer, release, or sell the same by an instrument in writing evidencing such transfer, release, or sale, and upon application to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services where such mark or brand is registered for the recordation of such instrument in writing, and upon the filing of the same with such department and the payment of a fee of $2 the department shall cause such instrument or transfer, release, or sale to be placed on record in a book provided and kept by it for that purpose, and certificates of such transfer, upon application therefor, shall be issued by it in like manner, upon the payment of like fees, as provided for the issuance of certificates under the provisions of s. 506.21.

History.—s. 4, ch. 16018, 1933; s. 4, ch. 16859, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 7087(4), (16); s. 1, ch. 67-18; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 506.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 506.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 506.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 506.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 506.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 506.22

Total Results: 6

Alfredo Francisco Gonzalez v. Caridad Pilar Calles

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: supplemental petition and order the Father to pay $506.22 per month in child support.

Asous v. Guardianship of J.L.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-12-18

Citation: 128 So. 3d 900, 2013 WL 6644759, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19969

Snippet: account, and Mr. Asous and Ms. Asous also wired $97,506.22 from the liquidation of their account at Schwab

Perry v. Perry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-05

Citation: 976 So. 2d 1151, 2008 WL 588901

Snippet: jurisprudes[4] is Riggs v. Palmer, 115 N.Y. 506, 22 N.E. 188 (1889), which held that the laws governing

Adams v. Adams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-21

Citation: 423 So. 2d 596

Snippet: required to pay only undisputed arrearages of $6,506.22 and did not include an additional $10,615.92, which

Trustees of Tufts College v. Triple R. Ranch, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-03-21

Citation: 275 So. 2d 521

Snippet: Fla., 231 So.2d 197; Riggs v. Palmer, 115 N.Y. 506, 22 N.E. 188; Beley v. Naphtaly, 169 U.S. 353, 18 S

Mullarkey v. Florida Feed Mills, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-10-25

Citation: 268 So. 2d 363

Snippet: ostensibly denies. Compare Riggs v. Palmer, 115 N.Y. 506, 22 N.E. 188; Beley v. Naphtaly, 169 U.S. 353, 18 S