Florida Statute 513.055 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 513
MOBILE HOME AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 513.055

513.055 Revocation or suspension of permit; fines; procedure.—

(1)(a) The department may suspend or revoke a permit issued to any person for a mobile home park, lodging park, recreational vehicle park, or recreational camp upon the failure of that person to comply with this chapter or the rules adopted under this chapter.

(b) A permit may not be suspended under this section for a period of more than 12 months. At the end of the period of suspension, the permittee may apply for reinstatement or renewal of the permit. A person whose permit is revoked may not apply for another permit for that location prior to the date on which the revoked permit would otherwise have expired.

(2)(a) In lieu of such suspension or revocation of a permit, the department may impose a fine against a permittee for the permittee’s failure to comply with the provisions described in paragraph (1)(a) or may place such licensee on probation. No fine so imposed shall exceed $500 for each offense, and all amounts collected in fines shall be deposited with the Chief Financial Officer to the credit of the County Health Department Trust Fund.

(b) In determining the amount of fine to be imposed, if any, for a violation, the department shall consider the following factors:

1. The gravity of the violation and the extent to which the provisions of the applicable statutes or rules have been violated.

2. Any action taken by the operator to correct the violation.

3. Any previous violation.

History.—ss. 9, 15, ch. 83-321; s. 9, ch. 84-182; s. 17, ch. 93-120; ss. 12, 26, ch. 93-150; ss. 149, 150, ch. 97-101; s. 568, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 513.055 on Google Scholar

F.S. 513.055 on Casetext

Amendments to 513.055

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 513.055

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 513.055.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 513.055

Total Results: 20

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1987-04-14

Snippet: prescribed in s. 513.045(1), F.S. See also, ss. 513.055(1)(a); 513.10(1). A "public body" is defined in

Joseph v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-13

Citation: 447 So. 2d 243

Snippet: modern newspaper); Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273 (1911) (rule precluding the children of

Belcher Oil Company v. Dade County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-12-20

Citation: 271 So. 2d 118

Snippet: 2d 804, (1945); Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273, (1911); State v. Board of Public Instruction

In Re Estate of McGinty

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-12-01

Citation: 258 So. 2d 450

Snippet: p. 243, citing Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273, reh. den. 61 Fla. 534, 55 So. 281 (1911);

Rubin v. Sanford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-01-21

Citation: 218 So. 2d 177, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6222

Snippet: general acts. See: Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; State ex rel. Badgett v. Lee, 156 Fla

State v. White

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-02-01

Citation: 194 So. 2d 601

Snippet: meritorious. In Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273, we said that "[w]here a statute is judicially

State v. Altman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-10-31

Citation: 106 So. 2d 401

Snippet: Fla. Const. [7] Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273, 280; McConville v. Ft. Pierce Bank & Trust

Rodriguez v. Jones

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-03-31

Citation: 64 So. 2d 278, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1182

Snippet: such re-enactment. Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; Carlton v. State, 63 Fla. 1, 58 So. 486;

Thompson v. Intercounty Tel. & Tel. Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-12-19

Citation: 62 So. 2d 16, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1862

Snippet: the opinion in Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273, date from its origin but not affect rights

Weed v. Knox

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1946-10-04

Citation: 27 So. 2d 419, 157 Fla. 896, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 895

Snippet: 123 So. 768, and Christopher v. Mungen,61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 223, at page 226; but as we read these cases

State Ex Rel. Badgett v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-07-20

Citation: 22 So. 2d 804, 156 Fla. 291, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 827

Snippet: was maintained. Christopher, v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273. In that case Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD

Trotter v. Van Pelt

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-10-01

Citation: 198 So. 215, 144 Fla. 517

Snippet: obtains in Florida. Christopher v. Munger, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273. The language of the will was clear and

Lockwood v. Walker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-02-01

Citation: 172 So. 359, 127 Fla. 20

Snippet: statute (Christopher v. Mungen, et al., 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273), and also determine as incidental to the

State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-11-09

Citation: 164 So. 188, 121 Fla. 541

Snippet: Constitution. See Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So.2d 273, 12 C.J. 801. "When a legislative enactment

Sparks v. Ewing

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-05-01

Citation: 163 So. 112, 120 Fla. 520

Snippet: decision was effective. Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513,55 So.2d 273; State, ex rel. Nuveen, v. Greer, 88

State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. County of Bay

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-11-13

Citation: 151 So. 10, 112 Fla. 687

Snippet: Constitution. See Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513,55 So.2d 273; 12 C. J. 801. When a legislative enactment

First Trust & Savings Bank v. West Lake Investment Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-05-31

Citation: 141 So. 894, 105 Fla. 590

Snippet: 730; Christopher et al. v. Mungen et al., 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; Martinez et al. v. Ward et. al., 19 Fla

Waller v. First Savings & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-12-23

Citation: 138 So. 780, 103 Fla. 1025

Snippet: stare decisis. See Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 Sou. Rep. 273, where the holding in Adams v. Sneed

McConville v. Ft. Pierce Bk. Tr. Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-05-29

Citation: 135 So. 392, 101 Fla. 727

Snippet: such revision. Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273. The act of 1927 may therefore be considered

Blitch v. Buchanan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-11-12

Citation: 131 So. 151, 100 Fla. 1202

Snippet: Philips, supra; Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. R. 273. A statute should be in positive conflict