The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Fees/Law Firm Vendor 19 CT Corporation Report Filing $517.12 Representation 20 David Simek Expense $1,233.19 . . . Fees/Law Firm Vendor 19 CT Corporation Report Filing $517.12 Representation 20 David Simek Expense $1,233.19 . . . Fees/Law Firm Vendor 19 CT Corporation Report Filing $517.12 Representation 20 David Simek Expense $1,233.19 . . . Next with regard to CT Corporation and the $517.12 indebtedness that the Alleged Debtors represent is . . .
. . . . §§ 517.12 & 517.211, and “Registration Violations of Virginia Blue Sky Laws,” Va. . . .
. . . . §§ 517.07, 517.12, 626.611(16), (17), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .
. . . Stat. (2012) (defining "associated person”); § 517.12, Fla. . . .
. . . brokers, dealers, and agents who were not registered in Florida, in violation of Florida Statutes §§ 517.12 . . .
. . . alleging that the purchased units qualify as securities and that the sale violated sections 517.07 and 517.12 . . .
. . . . § 517.12; and committed common law fraud and/or negligent misrepresentation in its attempts to induce . . .
. . . . § 517.12; (11) Violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.301; (12) Accounting. . . . . Stat. § 517.12; (11) Violation of Fla. Stat. § 517.301; (12) Accounting. . . .
. . . individually and d/b/a Anglo Offshore Resources, and Merrill Lynch; a violation of Florida Statute § 517.12 . . . Failure to Plead Oumership over the Securities as required under Florida Statute § 517.12 Morgan seeks . . . dismissal of Count II of the Amended Complaint that alleges a violation of Florida Statute § 517.12. . . . Section 517.12 provides in relevant part: No dealer, associated person, or issuer of securities shall . . . Stat. § 517.12(1). . . .
. . . . § 517.12. . . .
. . . Section 517.12(b), Florida Statutes, provides: Registration of dealers, associated persons, investment . . .
. . . Section 517.211 into Sections 517.211(1) and (2), the former directed to violations of Section 517.07 and 517.12 . . .
. . . Stat. ch. 517.12; (10) fraudulent transactions in violation of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection . . . Stat. ch. 517.12; (11) conspiracy to defraud; and (12) accounting. . . . While count 10 of Grippo’s complaint refers to Florida Statute Chapter 517.12, based on the allegations . . .
. . . Plaintiffs further maintain that Sections 517.12, 560.111, 655.50, and 517.301, Florida Statutes, impose . . . As Defendant correctly notes, Section 517.12, Fla. . . . As discussed in the November 4, 2003 Order, Plaintiffs argued that Sections 517.12, 560.111, 655.50 and . . .
. . . . § 517.12. . . . Stat. § 517.12. . . .
. . . fiduciary duty to Claimants William Bright and Jean Bright, and violated Florida Statutes sections 517.12 . . . (1), 517.12(11), 517.07(1), 517.012(5) and Rules 3E-600.002(2) and 3E-600.008(5), FLA Admin. . . . Respondent violated Florida Statutes sections 517.12(1), 517.07(1), 517.12(5), 517.12(11), Rules 3E-600.002 . . . In Ainsworth, Plaintiff arbitrated a claim for violation of F.S. 517.12 before an NASD panel. . . . The Palmer court found that Florida Statute subsections 517.301(3) and 517.12(11) and rule 3E-600.08 . . .
. . . . § 517.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .
. . . Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated section 517.12, Florida Statutes, which prohibits any person . . .
. . . ; and interpreting the interplay between sections 517.12 and 517.211). . . . Skumick states: “The intent of section 517.12 is to protect purchasers and, if that section has been . . . Thus, LTI is not a member of a class of persons— purchasers of securities — that section 517.12 seeks . . . Stat. § 517.12, dealers, associated persons, investment advisors, and branch offices must be registered . . . Stat. § 517.12. As a result of BUEH-LER’S actions, LTI has been damaged. 7. . . .
. . . charged in this case relating to sales of securities by an unregistered agent are based on section 517.12 . . .
. . . . § 517.12, Fla. Stat. .§ 517.301, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Petersburg branch office, as required under Section 517.12(5) of the Florida Securities and Investor . . . That alternatively, Defendant violated Sections 517.12(11) and 517.12(13) of said act by failing to amend . . . Second, that Defendant breached its contract with Plaintiff by violating Sections 517.12 and 517.301 . . . , 517.12(11), and 517.12(13) of the Florida Securities Act, as well as Rule 3E-600.004(3)(c) and other . . . , including the violations of Sections 517.12(11) and 517.12(13) which Defendant committed. . . .
. . . Petersburg, Florida did not register as required under § 517.12(5) of the Florida Securities and Investor . . . Petersburg branch office, and thereby violated § 517.12(5) of the Florida Securities Act; 2. . . .
. . . . § 517.12, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . . § 517.12(11), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . contend that Rafal’s registration with the State of Florida as a securities dealer pursuant to section 517.12 . . . However, the Mesicks’ action does not claim a violation of Chapter 517 and, therefore, section 517.12 . . .
. . . applications under section 517.161, Florida Statutes (1989), based upon appellants’ having violated sections 517.12 . . . appellants from introducing evidence of mitigating circumstances as to the alleged violations of sections 517.12 . . . Both appellants were required by section 517.12, Florida Statutes (1989), to register with the Department . . . Section 517.12(1), Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent part: No dealer, associated person, . . . Section 517.12(11), Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent part: If the department finds that . . .
. . . The court in Palmer, however, next found that Florida Statute subsections 517.301(3) and 517.12(ll)(b . . . 517.301(3), their memoranda in opposition to Hutton’s motion for summary judgment did cite subsection 517.12 . . . Hutton, the Florida First District Court of Appeal in Palmer concluded that subsections 517.301(3) and 517.12 . . . Subsection 517.12(1 l)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), provides: Every dealer shall promptly file with the . . .
. . . . § 517.12(1). Nor were Defendants registered in Florida as "investment advisers.” . . . . § 517.021(10)(a) and § 517.12(4). . . .
. . . 9), Florida Statutes (1989), who was not registered to sell securities as is required under section 517.12 . . .
. . . information to them about their account, (5) breached the Margin Agreement, and (6) violated Fla.Stat. ch, 517.12 . . . In subpart C, we address count six of the amended counterclaim, the § 517.12 claim for rescissioñ of . . . not registered as a broker in Florida, placed several securities orders in violation of Fla.Stat. § 517.12 . . . Section 517.12 provides that “[n]o dealer, associated person, or issuer of securities shall sell or offer . . . Section 517.211(1) provides that Every sale made in violation of ... s. 517.12 may be rescinded at the . . .
. . . (Hutton), a securities dealer registered in Florida under section 517.12, Florida Statutes. . . . that David Kury, a Hutton employee registered in Florida as an associated person pursuant to section 517.12 . . . with the Department prior to selling or offering to sell securities to any persons in this state. § 517.12 . . . When read in pari materia, subsections 517.12(ll)(b) and 517.301(3), Florida Statutes (1983), and rule . . . This provision is now located in subsection 517.12(12)(b), Florida Statutes (1991). . . . .
. . . . § 517.12 (West Supp.1993). . . .
. . . Despite the fact that such conduct clearly violated Fla.Stat. ch. 517.12, which triggers the mandatory . . .
. . . activity in Florida for the purpose of making sales to the plaintiff in Florida, so as to invoke section 517.12 . . .
. . . The Department concluded that appellant had violated section 517.12(1), Florida Statutes, by conducting . . . also reasserts his contention that he should not have been found guilty of having violated section 517.12 . . . However, section 517.12 does not contain the element of scienter, and thus appellant’s asserted good . . . Houghtaling, 181 So.2d 636 (Fla.1965), the court noted that section 517.12 had been amended in 1935, . . . State, 400 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), where we rejected a constitutional attack on section 517.12 . . .
. . . Since this violated Fla.Stat. ch. 517.12, however, the district court awarded Ainsworth damages under . . . The district court properly applied Florida law in finding that the violation of Fla.Stat. ch. 517.12 . . . cursory, and without adequate explanation of how the conclusion was reached in light of Fla.Stat. ch. 517.12 . . . We agree with the United States District Court and find that the language in section 517.12 which states . . . So we now know that Skurnick violated chapter 517.12 and that Ainsworth is entitled to mandatory damages . . .
. . . . § 517.12 and that damages equating to $721,762.91 attended this violation per Fla.Stat. § 517.211. . . . In so finding, the district court outlined the elements of § 517.12 and then set about reviewing the . . . Finding, based upon its own review of the record, that Skurnick violated § 517.12, the district court . . . Instead, the circuit court limited its discussion only to the issues surrounding § 517.12. . . . See supra note 1 for statutory elements of § 517.12. . In Skurnick v. . . .
. . . would be involved in mortgage loans, and “securities dealers registered under the provisions of s. 517.12 . . .
. . . . § 517.12. Id. at 458. . . . securities broker in Connecticut and New York is making a sale of securities in Florida under section 517.12 . . . Stat. § 517.12. . . . The pertinent part of' section 517.12(1), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Registration of dealers, . . . The intent of section 517.12 is to protect purchasers and, if that section has been violated, damages . . .
. . . licensed small business investment companies, or securities dealers registered under the provisions of s. 517.12 . . .
. . . Plaintiffs also seek recovery on three state claims: violation of Florida Statute § 517.12 (1989 & Supp . . . Florida Statute § 517.12. . . . Florida Statute § 517.12 states “[n]o dealer, associated person, or issuer of securities shall sell or . . . Fla.Stat. § 517.12 (1989). . . . Plaintiffs’ complaint and deposition testimony shows they were not the victims of a section 517.12 violation . . .
. . . . §§ 517.12 and 517.211. . . .
. . . . § 517.12, specifically the determination of when a sale of securities is considered to have been made . . . This Court has found no cases directly under § 517.12 which explain what it means to sell a security . . . Clearly, Skurnick sold securities to Ainsworth within the meaning of Fla.Stat. § 517.12 and § 517.021 . . . This Court has found no cases directly under § 517.12 which explain what it means to sell a security . . . Section 517.12. . . .
. . . . § 517.12 (Count VI). . . . from arguing that any such provision was part of the parties’ agreement. 6.Violation of Fla.Stat. § 517.12 . . . Counterclaim, the Milos’ seek to rescind certain unidentified transactions pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 517.12 . . . The remedies for violation of Section 517.12 are set forth in Fla.Stat. § 517.211 which authorizes rescission . . . It reads in pertinent part: (1) Every sale made in violation of ... § 517.12 may be rescinded at the . . .
. . . . § 517.12(1) (1987). . . .
. . . Motion for More Definite Statement as to Alleged Violations of Florida Statute Section 517.12 in Count . . .
. . . .-03(1), and the cited statutes being implemented are sections 517.12 and 120.53, Florida Statutes. . . . to applications for reaffiliation, and section 517.12(10) was amended to delete reference to a fee for . . . Section 517.12(11), section 3, was added to clarify Department procedures as follows: It is declared . . . In light of the amendatory language, we find that the stricken terms “initial” in section 517.12(6) and . . . “reaffiliation of a registered associated person” in section 517.12(10) may reasonably be regarded as . . .
. . . registration as an associated person with First United Securities Group of California under section 517.12 . . . Evans, 540 So.2d 884 (Fla.1st DCA 1988), we held that the provisions in section 517.12, both before and . . . Section 517.12(11), Florida Statutes (1987), states, “If the Department finds that the applicant is of . . . Section 517.161(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides in part that “Registration under s. 517.12 may . . .
. . . .— (1) Every sale made in violation of either s.517.07 or s.517.12 may be rescinded at the election of . . .
. . . Banking and Finance an application for registration as an “associated person,” pursuant to Section 517.12 . . .
. . . registered as securities under Sec. 517.07 and the appellants were not registered as dealers under Sec. 517.12 . . .
. . . cease and desist selling certificates of deposit with unregistered brokers in violation of Section 517.12 . . .
. . . The language of the Order finds its origin in § 517.12, F.S.A. (1981): No dealer, associated person, . . .
. . . For a registration violation under section 507.07 [sic] or section 517.12, the purchaser has the option . . .
. . . . § 517.12, Fla. Stat. (1981). . . .
. . . 181 So.2d 636 (Fla.1965) (section 517.07 prohibiting the sale of unregistered securities and section 517.12 . . .
. . . sufficient to charge the appellant with selling securities in violation of the provisions of Section 517.12 . . . proof to implicate and hold appellant responsible for the sale of securities in violation of Section 517.12 . . .
. . . . § 517.12(1) (regulating broker registration), which applies to sales “in or from offices in this state . . . Petrites brought five counts in his amended complaint: a count for rescission for violation of Fla.Stat. § 517.12 . . .
. . . units in the Lakes were made without payment of commissions, except for persons registered under § 517.12 . . .
. . . selling the notes without being registered as a dealer or salesman of securities, in violation of Section 517.12 . . .
. . . denying the petitioners’ application for a Florida securities dealer’s license pursuant to Section 517.12 . . .
. . . against a dealer or salesman under this section shall have a right of action under the bond provided in § 517.12 . . .
. . . securities without having first registered as a dealer or salesman. . . .’’in violation of Florida Statute 517.12 . . . The subject informations were filed on the 11th day of September, 1973, therefore, Florida Statute 517.12 . . .
. . . . § 517.12(4). . . . . against a dealer or salesman under this section shall have a right of action under the bond provided in § 517.12 . . .
. . . Section 517.12, F.S.A.; and (3) fraudulent sale of securities, F.S. Section 517.301, F.S.A. . . .
. . . . §§ 517.07 and 517.12, F.S.A.) . . .
. . . securities within the purview and intent of Florida law and, as such, must be registered in accordance with §517.12 . . .
. . . Sections 517.07 and 517.12 require the sellers of certain kinds of securities, including the ones involved . . .
. . . . § 517.12(1), F.S.A. . F.S. § 517.19(4) (6), F.S.A. . F.S. § 517.302, F.S.A. . McManus v. . . . F.S. § 517.12(1), F.S.A. . Rule 1.510(e), R.C.P. “Form of Affidavits; Further Testimony. . . .
. . . been registered with the Florida Public Securities Commission; and (2) for allegedly violating Sec. 517.12 . . . reasoning as follows: (1) that the Smith case specifically referred only to Sec. 517.07 and not to Sec. 517.12 . . . ; (2) that the rule of the Smith case should not be extended to include Sec. 517.12 for reasons to be . . . below; and (3) that, in any event, there was no reason to read a requirement of scienter into Section 517.12 . . .
. . . with selling securities without having registered as a dealer or salesman therefor, in violation of § 517.12 . . . First, the Smith case did not rule upon section 517.12 of the statute dealing with that offense. . . . Stat, F.S.A., and is reversed for quashal of the second count charging an offense under § 517.12, and . . .
. . . 650.00 3 424.92 4 1 602.99 3 205.98 106.04 5 099.94 5 880.26 1 760.52 120.00 3 640.52 6 1 258.56 2 517.12 . . .
. . . required and that the Relator thereby became entitled to all rights accruing under the provisions of Sec. 517.12 . . .
. . . He decreased the deductions claimed from $556,938.94 to $231,421.82, a decrease of $325,-517.12. . . .