Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. BEACH BLVD AUTOMOTIVE, INC. a a O. Sr., 139 So. 3d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . We find no merit in Appellant’s argument that it properly pled damages pursuant to section 520.12(2), . . .

BENGAL MOTOR COMPANY, LTD. d b a v. CUELLO,, 121 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . We disagree, however, with the trial court’s award of damages to Cuello based on section 520.12(2), as . . . Section 520.12(2), Florida Statutes (2011), states: (2) In the case of a willful violation of this part . . . delinquency, plus attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the buyer to assert rights under this part. § 520.12 . . .

VEAL, v. CROWN AUTO DEALERSHIPS, INC., 236 F.R.D. 572 (M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . with Crown Auto, no later than September 4, 1999, in which Crown violated Florida Statutes, section 520.12 . . . with Crown Auto, no later than September 4, 1999, in which Crown violated Florida Statutes, section 520.12 . . .

TROTTER v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION,, 868 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . cause of action for restitution is based solely on alleged violations of sections 520.07(2), 520.07(7), 520.12 . . . The remedies for violations of the Act are stated in sections 520.12 and 520.13. . . . See § 520.12(2). No such allegation was made concerning FMCC. . . .

HOLT v. O BRIEN IMPORTS OF FORT MYERS, INC. d b a, 862 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 501.2105 provides for prevailing party attorney’s fees for FDUTPA violations, sections 520.12 . . .

F. CANNON C. v. METRO FORD, INC., 242 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 520.12(2). . . . The statute was amended, effective June 8, 2001, to provide: Section 520.12(2) does not apply to any . . . Stat. § 520.12(3) (amended by Laws 2001, c.2001-196, § 32, eff. June 8, 2001). . . .

In CORCORAN, R. v., 268 B.R. 882 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . The Debtors therefore contend that, pursuant to § 520.12(2) of the Florida ■ Statutes, they are entitled . . .

CHARBONNEAU, v. MORSE OPERATIONS, INC. d b a Ed, 727 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . 501.2105, Florida Statutes and Count III sought statutory damages and attorney’s fees under section 520.12 . . . without authority to deny her claim for attorney’s fees available pursuant to statutes 501.2105 and 520.12 . . . and Unfair Trade Practices Act, section 501.2105(1) and the Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act, section 520.12 . . . Section 520.12, Florida Statutes (1997) provides that ”[i]n the case of a willful violation of this part . . .

STEWART SELECT CARS, INC. v. MOORE, 619 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . appellees moved for the assessment of prevailing party attorney’s fees pursuant to sections 501.2106 and 520.12 . . .

A. BACCUS, v. KARGER, M. E. Jr. J. A. D. S. W. II, J. F. Jr. W., 692 F. Supp. 290 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . . & Regs. tit. 22, §§ 520.1-520.12 (1986) (the “Rules”) have been promulgated pursuant to that authority . . . Comp.Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22, § 520.12 (1986). . . .

JONES v ORLANDO SECOND CAR CENTER, INC., 30 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . . §520.12(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . for lack of any misrepresentation, despite the clear mandate of sections 520.08 (rate ceilings) and 520.12 . . . Sedima, SPRL v Imrex Co., 105 S.Ct. 3275 (1985). § 520.12(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

ST. TAMMANY PARISH HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES,, 677 F. Supp. 455 (E.D. La. 1988)

. . . Hospital 472.78 724.83 472.78 Mercy Hospital of New Orleans 530.91 631.58 544.69 Hotel Dieu Hospital 520.12 . . . 613.97 520.12 Seventh Ward General Hospital 391.66 508.36 443.35 Lakeside Hospital 396.68 679.53 405.08 . . .

DONOGHUE, v. L. WALLACH, d b a, 455 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . However, the court pointed out that section 520.12, Florida Statutes (1981), the penalty section, which . . .

S. SHAPIRO, v. H. COOKE J. L. R. D. S., 552 F. Supp. 581 (N.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . Under 22 NYCRR § 520.12, the Court of Appeals may “vary the application or waive any provision of these . . .

GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA v. EMANUEL, 21 Fla. Supp. 175 (Dade Cty. Small Cl. Ct. 1963)

. . . Under §520.12 (2), F.S., a wilful violation of §520.08, F.S., by the lender bars the lender from recovering . . . The legal effect of §520.12 (2) providing for penalty against lenders for wilfully exacting excessive . . .