Syfert Injury Law Firm

Ron DeSantis, Governor v. Dream Defenders

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-06-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: intoxication statute. Cross v. State, 374 So. 2d 519, 520-21 (Fla. 1979) (citing § 856.011(1), Fla. Stat. (

William B. Pino, Jr., M.D. v. Maria Graciela Pino

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: present their case. Julia v. Julia, 146 So. 3d 516, 520–21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Pettry v. Pettry, 706 So.

CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST v. DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-05-10T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Miami Herald Publ’g Co. v. Marko, 352 So. 2d 518, 520–21 (Fla. 1977) (“It is undoubtedly for this reason

IN RE: FINAL REPORT OF THE 20TH STATEWIDE GRAND JURY CASE 8 vs

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: grand jury proceeding.” Miami Herald, 352 So. 2d at 520–21, 523 (concluding that there was nothing unlawful…jurisdictional authority. Miami Herald, 352 So. 2d at 520–21, 523. Accordingly, the petitioners have not established

STEPHANIE OROZCO v. CARLOS RODRIGUEZ-AMADEO

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-06-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: testify, or present evidence); Julia, 146 So. 3d at 520-21 (reversing where wife was not able to call witnesses

Sean Alonzo Bush v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-05-14T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the verdict, see Wright v. State, 221 So. 3d 512, 520-21 (Fla. 2017), for the reasons explained by the Fifth

Pena v. Rodriguez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-05-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 273 So. 3d 237

Snippet: child support. See Julia v. Julia, 146 So. 3d 516, 520-21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding that the wife was

Frank Certo and Muriel Certo v. The Bank of New York Mellon F/K/A etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-03T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Morgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 174 So. 3d 519, 520-21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (testimony one entity “took

JAMES L. ESSENSON v. DOROTHY B. BLOOM AND ROBERT M. ELLIOT, AS TRUSTEE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Representatives v. Expedia, Inc., 85 So. 3d 517, 520-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Regardless, the posture in

Essenson v. Bloom (In re Bloom)

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 251 So. 3d 1026

Snippet: Representatives v. Expedia, Inc., 85 So.3d 517, 520-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Regardless, the posture in

ANTHONY M DELOPA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: based on hearsay. Hall v. State, 744 So. 2d 517, 520–21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). While hearsay is admissible

E-Commerce Coffee Club v. Miga Holdings, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-06-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 222 So. 3d 9, 2017 WL 2814793, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9413

Snippet: 2013); see also Julia v. Julia, 146 So.3d 516, 520-21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (describing a due. process …See Cole, 159 So.3d at 125; Julia, 146 So.3d at 520-21. Appellant never rested its case and clearly intended

Patel v. Shah

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-03-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 152, 2017 WL 1177598, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4199

Snippet: DCA 2015) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)). Thus, as

Manuel F. Palancar v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-07-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 204 So. 3d 473, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10376

Snippet: . See Cross v. State, 374 So.2d 519, 520-21 (Fla.1979) (affirming disorderly intoxication conviction

Abraham Segall v. Wachovia Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 192 So. 3d 1241, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8354, 2016 WL 3065599

Snippet: bank that originated the loan. Id. at 520-21. While the plaintiffs witness testified that a

Suarez v. Orta

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: their function. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). In particular, Florida courts emphasize

Suarez v. Orta

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 176 So. 3d 327, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13041, 2015 WL 5132617

Snippet: function. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972). In particular

Castro v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 3d 77, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13062

Snippet: function. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972). Specifically

Heritage Circle Condominium Ass'n v. State, Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Condominiums, Timeshares & Mobile Homes

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-09-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 121 So. 3d 1141, 2013 WL 5222646, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14815

Snippet: 2005); Bank One, N.A. v. Harrod, 873 So.2d 519, 520-21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Other courts have agreed that

Smith v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-09-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 126 So. 3d 1038, 2013 WL 5312085

Snippet: in another cell. Smith v. State, 998 So.2d 516, 520-21 (Fla.2008). During the penalty phase, the State