Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 526.302 (2025)

Legislative findings and intent.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

526.302 Legislative findings and intent.—The Legislature finds that fair and healthy competition in the marketing of motor fuel provides maximum benefits to consumers in this state, and that certain marketing practices which impair such competition are contrary to the public interest. Predatory practices and, under certain conditions, discriminatory practices, are unfair trade practices and restraints which adversely affect motor fuel competition. It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage competition and promote the general welfare of citizens of this state by prohibiting such unfair practices.

History.—s. 2, ch. 85-74.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2015 · leading case: Racetrac Petroleum v. Delco Oil, Inc., 721 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Racetrac Petroleum v. Delco Oil, Inc., 721 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). · cites it 2× “" § 526.302, Fla. Stat. (1995). AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN, C.”

Sixty Enter. v. Roman & Ciro, Inc., 601 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). · cites it 3× “Section 526.302, Florida Statutes (1991).”

United Food Mart, Inc. v. Motiva Enter., LLC, 457 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (S.D. Fla. 2005). · cites it 2× “” Fla. Stat. § 526.302 . Specifically, it is unlawful under the FMFMPA for any person engaged in commerce in Florida [t]o sell for resale any grade of motor fuel at a price lower than the price at which the seller contemporaneously sells motor fuel of like grade and quality to…”

NJN Sys., Inc. v. Sunoco, Inc., 95 F. Supp. 3d 1330 (M.D. Fla. 2015). · cites it 2× “” § 526.302 Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). “Marketing” constitutes organized sales efforts, which suggests that the legislature was concerned with patterns of fuel sale activities which were anti-competitive, not occasional and randomized below-cost sales that were not part of a…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.