Florida Statute 540.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 540
COMMERCIAL DISCRIMINATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 540.05

540.05 Ouster of corporation found guilty.—If after revocation of its permit, such corporation, or any other corporation not having a permit and found guilty of having violated any of the provisions of this chapter, shall continue or attempt to do business in this state, the Department of Legal Affairs, by a proper suit in the name of the state, shall oust such corporation from all business of every kind and character in this state.

History.—s. 6, ch. 6945, 1915; RGS 2521; CGL 3943; ss. 11, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 540.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 540.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 540.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 540.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 540.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 540.05

Total Results: 10

Michael T. Rivera v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-20

Snippet: factor on direct appeal. Rivera I, 561 So. 2d at 540. _5_ We affirmed the denial of Rivera’s initial motion

Bernard v. Rose

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-08-17

Citation: 68 So. 3d 946, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12979, 2011 WL 3586172

Snippet: consent." 4 Fla. Prac., Civil Procedure R. 1.540, ¶ 540.5(1)(d), (2010-2011 ed.) (citations omitted).

In Re Guardianship of Schiavo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-03-16

Citation: 916 So. 2d 814, 2005 WL 600377

Snippet: generally Bruce J. Berman, Florida Civil Procedure ¶ 540.5(d), at 668 (West Fla. Practice Series 2003 ed.)

STATE, DOT v. Southtrust Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-11-15

Citation: 886 So. 2d 393

Snippet: error found to constitute excusable neglect. Id. ¶ 540.5[1][a], at 649. See also Carter, 840 So.2d at 1158

Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-06-19

Citation: 848 So. 2d 1069, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1063, 2003 WL 21402500

Snippet: 710, and 5.800; creation of new rules 5.496, 5.540, 5.541, 5.555, 5.635, 5.636, 5.690, 5.696, 5.697,

Macar v. Macar

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-06

Citation: 803 So. 2d 707, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 799, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2282

Snippet: motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540.5 The district court applied the only possible rule

MacAr v. MacAr

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-06

Citation: 803 So. 2d 707, 2001 WL 1547904

Snippet: motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540.[5] The district court applied the only possible rule

Hialeah Hotel, Inc. v. Woods

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-12-06

Citation: 778 So. 2d 314, 2000 WL 1781270

Snippet: ); Bruce J. Berman, Florida Civil Procedure, ¶ 540.5, at 647 (1999 ed.); see also Burke v. Reyes, 687

Harrison v. La Placida Community Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-01-10

Citation: 665 So. 2d 1138, 1996 WL 6541

Snippet: differences." [4] The motion to vacate refers to rule 1.540(5) which does not exist. If the reference is to rule

In re Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-09-24

Citation: 607 So. 2d 1306, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 636, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1622, 1992 WL 249483

Snippet: 710, and 5.800; creation of new rules 5.496, 5.540, 5.541, 5.555, 5.635, 5.636, 5.690, 5.696, 5.697,