Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 542.30 (2025)

Jurisdiction and venue.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1542.30 Jurisdiction and venue.Without regard to the amount in controversy, a suit or proceeding brought under this part shall be brought in the circuit court in and for any county in which the cause of action arose; in which any defendant resides, is found, or has an agent; or in which any act in furtherance of the conduct prohibited by this part occurred.
History.s. 1, ch. 80-28; s. 16, ch. 2025-213.
1Note.Amended by s. 16, ch. 2025-213, effective July 1, 2025, per s. 22, ch. 2025-213. Chapter 2025-213 became law without the Governor’s signature on July 3, 2025, per s. 8(a), Art. III of the State Constitution. In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor Request of June 29, 1979, 374 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1979), specifies the constitutional effective date in s. 9, Art. III of the State Constitution in this situation. The constitutional effective date is August 15, 2025, for ch. 2025-213.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2021 · leading case: Sabates v. Int'l Med. Centers, Inc., 450 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Sabates v. Int'l Med. Centers, Inc., 450 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). · cites it 2× “(1981), contains no express provision preserving the right to bring an action in the courts, nonetheless, because cases involving antitrust violations are generally considered to be "of a character inappropriate for enforcement by arbitration," American Safety Equipment Corp.”
Patel v. Ashco Enter., Inc., 711 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). · cites it 4× “See § 542.30, Fla. Stat. (1995). However, the parties' mediation agreement was valid and enforceable.”
Avalon Carriage Serv. Inc. v. City of St. Augustine, 417 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2006). “Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Defendants Harriss and Litzinger briefly provide that if Plaintiff is trying to assign individual liability to them under Section 2 of the Sherman Act for “counseling the [City] Commission not to issue” Plaintiff more permits, such liability is barred…”
Crystal Lake Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Zilis (M.D. Fla. 2021). · cites it 2× “CAFA Jurisdiction The initial Complaint and Amended Complaint allege state court jurisdiction, citing Fla. Stat. § 542.30 . Doc. 1-1 ¶ 29; 16 ¶ 29.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.