Florida Statute 546.006 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 546
AMUSEMENT FACILITIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 546.006

546.006 Exemptions.—The following amusement rides and amusement attractions are exempt from the provisions of ss. 546.001-546.008:

(1) Nonmechanized playground equipment, including, but not limited to, swings, seesaws, stationary spring-mounted animal features, rider-propelled merry-go-rounds, climbers, slides, trampolines, swinging gates, and physical fitness devices, except when an admission fee is charged for use of such equipment or an admission fee is charged to areas where such equipment is located.

(2) An amusement ride or amusement attraction which is owned and operated by a nonprofit religious, educational, or charitable institution or association or by a fair; however, if such ride or attraction is located within a building, the ride or attraction is exempt only if the building is subject to inspection by the State Fire Marshal or by a political subdivision of the state under its building, fire, electrical, and related public safety ordinances.

History.—s. 5, ch. 83-110; s. 71, ch. 87-225; s. 1, ch. 87-264; s. 2, ch. 89-111.

F.S. 546.006 on Google Scholar

F.S. 546.006 on Casetext

Amendments to 546.006

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 546.006

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 546.006.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 546.006

Total Results: 2

James v. Keene

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-06-09

Citation: 121 So. 2d 186

Snippet: proximate causes. Davies v. Mann, 10 Mees. & W. 546, 6 Juris. pt. 2, 954; Tanner v. Louisville & N.R.

Merchants Transportation Co. v. Daniel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-04-22

Citation: 149 So. 401, 109 Fla. 496

Snippet: proximate causes. Davies v. Mann, 10 Mees. W. 546, 6 Juris, Part. 2, 954; Tanner v. Louisville N. R