Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 553.83 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 553.83 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 553.83

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 553
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 553.83
553.83 Injunctive relief.Any local government, legally constituted enforcement district, or state agency authorized to enforce sections of the Florida Building Code under s. 553.80 may seek injunctive relief from any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin the offering for sale, delivery, use, occupancy, erection, alteration, or installation of any building covered by this part, upon an affidavit of the local government, code enforcement district, or state agency specifying the manner in which the building does not conform to the requirements of the Florida Building Code, or local amendments to the Florida Building Code. Noncompliance with the building code promulgated under this part shall be considered prima facie evidence of irreparable damage in any cause of action brought under authority of this part.
History.s. 14, ch. 74-167; s. 5, ch. 77-365; s. 87, ch. 2000-141; s. 34, ch. 2001-186; s. 3, ch. 2001-372.

F.S. 553.83 on Google Scholar

F.S. 553.83 on Casetext

Amendments to 553.83


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 553.83
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 553.83.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 553.83

Total Results: 5

Bratzke v. John Fowke Construction Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-03-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 576 So. 2d 921, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2621

Snippet: actually adds up to $393,-555.83, instead of $423,553.83 as indicated in the final judgment. On the other…merely a typographical one. Fowke claims that $423,553.83 is the correct total, but that the wrong figure

Bohlen v. Shaw

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-02-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 445 So. 2d 714, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11967

Snippet: DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur. Nos. 83-553, 83-554 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1976-12-20T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: in ss. 553.73(4) and (6), 553.74(3), 553.81, and 553.83, F. S. According to your budget office, appropriations…553.77(1), (2), and (3); 553.81(1) and (2); and 553.83, F. S.), should either or both do so, either or

State Ex Rel. Taylor v. City of Tallahassee

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1937-12-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 177 So. 719, 130 Fla. 418

Snippet: Calif. 208; 24 P. 747; Trammell v. Yancey,142 Ga. 553; 83 S.E. 114; State, ex rel. Reedhead, v. City of Olympia

Marianna & Blountstown Railroad v. May

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1922-04-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 83 Fla. 524, 91 So. 553

Snippet: , Taylor, West, Whitfield 11 April 1922 91 So. 553, 83 Fla. 524 Paul Garter, for Plaintiff in Eerror;