Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 573.106 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 573.106 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 573.106

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 573
MARKETING OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 573.106
573.106 Petitioner’s expense.—Prior to the issuance of any marketing order by the department, the department shall require the applicants to deposit with it such amounts as the department may deem necessary to defray the expenses of preparing and making effective any marketing order. Funds shall be received, deposited, and disbursed by the department; provided, however, any balance remaining shall be returned to the petitioners if the proposed order does not become effective. If the proposed order does become effective, the total amount deposited may be refunded from the funds collected under the order upon the recommendation of the advisory council and approval of the department.
History.—ss. 6, 26, ch. 87-171; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 573.106 on Google Scholar

F.S. 573.106 on Casetext

Amendments to 573.106


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 573.106
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 573.106.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 573.106

Total Results: 3

Ivey v. BACARDI IMPORTS, CO., INC.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-23

Citation: 541 So. 2d 1129, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 129, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 201, 1989 WL 27659

Snippet: v. New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573, 106 S.Ct. 2080, 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986), we concluded

Associated Schools, Inc. v. State, Department of Education

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-08

Citation: 522 So. 2d 426, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 630, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1036, 1988 WL 20575

Snippet: v. New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573, 106 S.Ct. 2080, 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986), which we think

Div. of Alcoholic Bev. v. McKesson Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-02-18

Citation: 524 So. 2d 1000

Snippet: v. New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573, 106 S.Ct. 2080, 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986). This approach