Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 576.151 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 576.151 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 576.151

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 576
AGRICULTURAL FERTILIZERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 576.151
576.151 Prohibited acts.The following acts are prohibited:
(1) The dissemination of any false advertisement or advertising matter with reference to the distribution or sale of fertilizer.
(2) The refusal to permit entry or inspection or the taking of samples.
(3) The removal or disposal of a detained or “stop-sale” lot of fertilizer or the stop-sale order.
(4) The detaching, altering, defacing or destruction, in whole or in part, of any label or labeling provided for in this law or rules adopted hereunder.
(5) The placing or causing to be placed on labels any false advertisement or misleading statement.
(6) The misbranding of fertilizer.
(7) The forging, counterfeiting, simulating, falsely representing, or improper use of any label authorized or required by s. 576.031, or any rule or regulation.
(8) The sale of any material as a fertilizer or as an ingredient of any mixed fertilizer showing an activity of water-insoluble nitrogen less than prescribed by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Fertilizer not defined by the Association of American Plant Food Control Officials may be distributed as fertilizer, provided the licensee furnishes an acceptable definition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists analysis, or other appropriate method of analysis and provides efficacy studies with appropriate controls that have been generated in accordance with good scientific practices whose results have been peer reviewed and published in a generally available scientific journal or have been reviewed and recognized by the research department of an accredited agricultural college or university. The data must clearly quantify and demonstrate a beneficial plant growth response attributable to the fertilizer material when it is used in accordance with the manufacturer’s or distributor’s recommendations.
(9) The failure or refusal to do or perform any affirmative provision or the doing or performing of any prohibited provision of this chapter or of any rule adopted pursuant to this chapter.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-348; s. 7, ch. 76-35; ss. 16, 19, ch. 92-143; ss. 9, 11, ch. 97-6.

F.S. 576.151 on Google Scholar

F.S. 576.151 on Casetext

Amendments to 576.151


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 576.151
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S576.151 1 - FRAUD - FALSE ADVRT RE SALE DISTRIBUTE COMM FERTILIZER - M: S
S576.151 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REFUSE ENTRY INSPECTOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER - M: S
S576.151 3 - OBSTRUCT CRIMINAL INVEST - REMOVE DETAIN STOP SALE ORDER FERTILIZER - M: S
S576.151 4 - HEALTH-SAFETY - DETACH ALTER DEFACE ETC COMM FERTILIZER LABEL - M: S
S576.151 5 - FRAUD - ADVRT MISLEAD STATEMENT COMM FERTILIZER LABEL - M: S
S576.151 6 - HEALTH-SAFETY - MISBRAND COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER - M: S
S576.151 7 - FORGERY OF - COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER LABEL - M: S
S576.151 7 - COUNTERFEITING OF - SIMULATE COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER LABEL - M: S
S576.151 7 - FRAUD - FALSE REP IMPROPER USE COMM FERTILIZER LABEL - M: S
S576.151 8 - HEALTH-SAFETY - SELL UNPROCESSED MATERIAL AS FERTILIZER - M: S
S576.151 9 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - PROHIBITED ACTS RE COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 576.151

Total Results: 2

Florida Greyhound Lines v. Jones

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-08-01

Citation: 60 So. 2d 396, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1383

Snippet: in Rodgers v. Boynton, 315 Mass. 279, 52 N.E.2d 576, 151 A.L.R. 475, that a wife may recover for the loss

State Ex Rel. Libtz v. Coleman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-12-12

Citation: 5 So. 2d 60, 149 Fla. 28, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1025

Snippet: 553, 99 So. 49; Thomas v. State, 25 Ala. App. 576,151 So. 473; White v. Pearlman, 42 F.2d 788. This case