Florida Statute 585.003 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 585
ANIMAL INDUSTRY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 585.003

585.003 Power of department to enter private premises for purpose of inspection, testing, etc.—

(1) For the purpose of carrying out the provisions and requirements of this chapter, and all rules made pursuant thereto, the department, through its duly authorized employees, is empowered to enter upon any grounds or premises in this state to:

(a) Inspect, test, dip, identify, treat, destroy, quarantine, disinfect, or conduct such other required procedures as are contemplated by this chapter;

(b) Examine any records or documents which facilitate efforts to determine locations where an animal may have been during the previous 120 days for the purpose of animal disease control eradication programs over which any authority is conferred by law upon the department; or

(2) After reasonable notice from the department or the department’s representative, owners or agents having jurisdiction over animals shall present them for such procedures as contemplated by this chapter in accordance with the directions of the department’s representative.

History.—s. 16, ch. 7345, 1917; RGS 2116; CGL 3343; s. 25, ch. 59-457; s. 2, ch. 87-151; s. 4, ch. 90-321; s. 55, ch. 91-220; s. 3, ch. 91-294.

Note.—Former s. 585.35.

F.S. 585.003 on Google Scholar

F.S. 585.003 on Casetext

Amendments to 585.003

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 585.003

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 585.003.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 585.003

Total Results: 20

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2016-02

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-08-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 3d 234

Snippet: Enhancements. Give if applicable. § 817.585(3), Fla. Stat. ■ If you find (defendant)

Telli v. Broward County

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-05-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 94 So. 3d 504

Snippet: State ex rel. Attorney General v. George, 23 Fla. 585, 3 So. 81 (1887); and Thomas v. State ex rel. Cobb

City of Jacksonville v. Cook

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-08-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 765 So. 2d 289

Snippet: State ex rel. Attorney General v. George, 23 Fla. 585, 3 So. 81 (1887); and Thomas v. State ex rel. Cobb

State v. Silva

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-04-01T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 691 So. 2d 529

Snippet: 943.0585(3)(d). We do not think it makes a difference. The first sentence of paragraph 943.0585(3)(d) …FDLE stated that, under authority of paragraph 943.0585(3)(d), Florida Statutes, the agency declined to act… act on the order to expunge. Paragraph 943.0585(3)(d) provides: (d) On or after July 1, 1992, the department…rejected FDLE's argument that under paragraph 943.0585(3)(d), Florida Statutes, it did not have to expunge…obtained.[2] The third sentence of paragraph 943.0585(3)(d) states that "[t]he appropriate state attorney

Kelley v. Kelley

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-06-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 656 So. 2d 1343

Snippet: by multiplying the wife's net income at $4,585 ($3,440) by 1.34, the ratio by which $6,158 exceeds

Kaufman v. Kaufman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-07-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 491 So. 2d 584

Snippet: undisputed annual expenses of the parties' *585 three minor children are substantially in excess of

Wagner v. Nottingham Associates

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-01-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 464 So. 2d 166

Snippet: Cir.1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 909, 79 S.Ct. 585, 3 L.Ed.2d 573 (1959); Pstragowski v. Metropolitan

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1981-08-04T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: this section.' (Emphasis supplied.) Cf. s. 713.585(3), F.S. (1980 Supp.), requiring the owner of a vehicle

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-07-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Miami Beach Water Board v. Gollin, 171 So.2d 584, 585 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1965). The board was originally established

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-04-09T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Miami Beach Water Board v. Gollin,171 So.2d 584, 585 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1965), such power may also be granted

City of Miami v. Wolfenberger

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-08-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 265 So. 2d 732

Snippet: First Amendment. Parker v. Morgan, 322 F. Supp. 585 (Three Judge Panel, W.D.N.D. 1971), holding North Carolina

Wilson v. Newell

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1969-06-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 223 So. 2d 734

Snippet: rel. Attorney General et al v. George, 23 Fla. 585, 3 So. 81; Thomas v. State ex rel. Cobb, et al, Fla

Nichols v. State ex rel. Bolon

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1965-07-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 177 So. 2d 467

Snippet: rel. Attorney-General v. George, 1887, 23 Fla. 585, 3 So. 81, the holding was merely to the effect that

Florida Livestock Board v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-07-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 2d 535

Snippet: 74 So.2d 560, 46 A.L.R.2d 1340. . F.S. Section 585.03, F.S.A. (Repealed by Ch. 59-457, Laws of Florida

Florida Livestock Board v. Gladden

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1956-04-10T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 86 So. 2d 812

Snippet: matter *813 before us. This statute is Section 585.03, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and reads in part as

Thomas v. State Ex Rel. Cobb

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1952-03-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 58 So. 2d 173

Snippet: State ex rel. Attorney General v. George, 23 Fla. 585, 3 So. 81, 82, by a Court composed of Justices who

Mutual Life Insurance v. Hartley

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1926-07-13T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 109 So. 421, 92 Fla. 237

Snippet: Fed. Rep. 360, 77 CCC. A. 538, 9 L.R.A. (N.S.) 585, 3 C. J 1209. Where a writ of error is made returnable

State v. Bryan

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1905-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 50 Fla. 293

Snippet: State ex rel. Attorney General v. George, 23 Fla. 585, 3 South. Rep. 81, also cited by the relator, seems…State ex rel. Attorney General v. George, 23 Fla. 585, 3 South. Rep. 81; State ex rel. Attorney General

Godwin v. King

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1893-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 31 Fla. 525

Snippet: latter. State ex rel. vs. *533George, 23 Fla., 585, 3 South. Rep., 81; State ex rel. vs. Johnson, 30

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Johnson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1892-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 30 Fla. 433

Snippet: Journal, p. 31 ; State ex rel. vs. George, 23 Fla., 585, 3 South. Rep., 81. It is plain that in some cases