Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 601.27 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 601.27 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 601.27

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 601.27
601.27 Department of Agriculture; citrus inspectors.The inspection in the state of all citrus fruit and the canned and concentrated products thereof, and the certifying as to grades and qualifications thereof, and the enforcement of all provisions of this chapter and rules and orders made pursuant to and under authority of this chapter shall be under the direction, supervision, and control of the Department of Agriculture. The sampling, testing, and inspection of all processed citrus products shall be done by authorized agents or inspectors of the Department of Agriculture or pursuant to cooperative agreement between the Department of Agriculture and any agency of the Federal Government.
History.s. 27, ch. 25149, 1949; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 7, ch. 71-185; s. 1, ch. 90-195.

F.S. 601.27 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.27 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.27


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.27
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.27.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PURVIS, v. STATE, 43 So. 3d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . 5 sealed bags, 67.35 grams 11 A, 67.35 grams 3e, 6 sealed bags, 97.02 grams IIE, 100.55 grams TOTAL 601.27 . . .

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN, PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,, 226 F. Supp. 2d 204 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . . §§ 314.55(c)(2), 601.27(c)(2). . . . . §§ 314.55(c)(2), 601.27(c)(2); 63 Fed.Reg. at 66,634. . . . See 21 C.F.R. §§ 314.55(c)(3), 601.27(c)(3). . . .

EVANS PACKING COMPANY, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,, 550 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 601.27 directs that inspection in Florida of citrus fruit and canned and concentrated products . . . Agriculture, as no effort had been made by either department to comply with these requirements of section 601.27 . . .

UNION CARBIDE INT L, CO. v. UNITED STATES, 461 F.2d 818 (C.C.P.A. 1972)

. . . They are claimed under TSUS item 601.27 as manganese ore. . . . However, since item 601.27 is clearly more specific than item 603.70, if appellant’s goods are also described . . .

l, Co. v., 59 C.C.P.A. 153 (C.C.P.A. 1972)

. . . They are claimed under TSUS item 601.27 as manganese ore. . . . However, since item 601.27 is clearly more specific than item 603.70, if appellant’s goods are also described . . .

v., 57 T.C. 249 (T.C. 1971)

. . . following deficiencies in petitioner’s income tax: Taxable year ended Deficiency March SI, 1965_$32, 601.27 . . .

l Co. v., 66 Cust. Ct. 46 (Cust. Ct. 1971)

. . . States where it was entered at the port of Baltimore in August 1964 as manganese ore under TSUS items 601.27 . . . Claimed: Metal-bearing ores and the dross or residuum from burnt pyrites: ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ 601.27 Manganese . . . iron ore, all the foregoing containing over 10 percent by weight of manganese (provided for in item 601.27 . . . Item 601.27, the manganese ore provision under which plaintiff claims classification, is governed by . . .

v., 61 Cust. Ct. 274 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . said merchandise was entered through the port of New Orleans, Louisiana, and was classified under item 601.27 . . .

OSCEOLA FRUIT DISTRIBUTORS, v. MAYO,, 115 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . Section 601.27, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

LAMBORN CO. v. UNITED STATES, 65 F. Supp. 569 (Ct. Cl. 1946)

. . . contracts, covering 549,853 pounds, accepted delivery at the contract price and plaintiff made a profit of $601.27 . . .

LAMBORN AND COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP IN LIQUIDATION, BY CHARLES C. RIGGS, GERARD TAMELING, GEORGE H. LOGAN, N. NELSON KEEN, CLARENCE G. TROUP, KARL E. LINDGREN, AND B. WHEELER DYER, AS SOLE SURVIVING PARTNERS, v. THE UNITED STATES, 106 Ct. Cl. 703 (Ct. Cl. 1946)

. . . contracts, covering 549,853 pounds, accepted delivery at the contract price and plaintiff made a profit of $601.27 . . .