Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 601.50 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 601.50 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 601.50

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 601.50
601.50 Exemptions; sale or shipment of citrus or citrus products for certain purposes.
(1) Notwithstanding ss. 601.45, 601.46, 601.48, 601.49, 601.51, and 601.52, the department may adopt such precautionary rules that it deems expedient to permit the sale or shipment of citrus fruit or the canned or concentrated products thereof without the issuance of and filing of an inspection certificate and without the grade being shown on the container thereof, of:
(a) Intrastate shipments of fresh citrus fruit for consumption or use within the state.
(b) Shipments to be used for charitable or unemployment relief purposes.
(c) Shipments to the United States Government or any of its agencies and interstate shipments to any packinghouse, canning plant, or concentrate plant for commercial processing, as may be defined by the department, or to fresh fruit juice distributors outside the state.
(d) Shipments by any method of transportation by “gift fruit shippers,” as defined by the department, but such shipments shall not be for the purpose of resale by the consignee thereof.
(2) However, any such rule adopted under this section may not permit or allow the sale or shipment of citrus fruit deemed by this section to be immature and unfit for human consumption or of canned or concentrated products thereof prepared or made from citrus fruit deemed by this law to be immature and unfit for human consumption. In addition, shipments under paragraphs (1)(a) and (d) must meet such minimum grade standards as may periodically be established by the department, and such rules must provide for the due collection of any advertising assessments and inspection fees that may be due thereon.
History.s. 50, ch. 25149, 1949; s. 18, ch. 26492, 1951; s. 1, ch. 59-41; s. 1, ch. 63-100; s. 1, ch. 67-24; s. 22, ch. 71-186; s. 37, ch. 2012-182.

F.S. 601.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.50


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.50
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.50.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.50

Total Results: 6

Avatar Development Corp. v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-22

Citation: 723 So. 2d 199, 1998 WL 732936

Snippet: 1107 (Fla.1981), the issue was whether section 601.50, Florida Statutes (1977),[6] which granted the

Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. Zrillic

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-05-31

Citation: 563 So. 2d 64, 1990 WL 74588

Snippet: Fla. 916, 123 So. 668, cert. denied, 280 U.S. 601, 50 S.Ct. 82, 74 L.Ed. 646 (1929), and In re Estate

Rosslow v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-16

Citation: 401 So. 2d 1107

Snippet: — (1) It is unlawful, except as provided in s. 601.50, for any person to sell or offer for sale, to transport

Osceola Fruit Distributors v. Mayo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-11-25

Citation: 115 So. 2d 760

Snippet: products of citrus fruit except as provided in § 601.50, sold, or offered for sale, or offered for shipment

In re Estate of Mitchell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-07-10

Citation: 96 So. 2d 661, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3578

Snippet: certiorari denied, Tiffany & Co. v. Davis, 280 U.S. 601, 50 S.Ct. 82, 74 L.Ed. 646. In that case it was pointed

City of Orlando v. Gooding

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1894-06-15

Citation: 34 Fla. 244

Snippet: principal defendant, Gooding, pleaded a set-off, of $601.50 alleged to be due him from the jfiaintiff city