Florida Statute 601.52 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.52

601.52 Carriers not to accept fruit without evidence of payment of assessments and fees.—A common carrier or other carrier or person, except as provided in s. 601.50, may not accept for shipment, ship, or transport any citrus fruit or processed citrus products unless the grade certificate, manifest, or bill of lading covering such citrus fruit or processed citrus products bears evidence of the payment, as provided by law, of the assessments and fees imposed by this chapter.

History.—s. 52, ch. 25149, 1949; s. 20, ch. 26492, 1951; s. 3, ch. 71-187; s. 40, ch. 2012-182.

F.S. 601.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.52

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.52

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.52.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.52

Total Results: 8

Russell v. Russell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-03-22

Citation: 922 So. 2d 1097, 2006 WL 708282

Snippet: share of her former husband's pension benefit as $601.52. This figure was based on the value of the pension

STATE, ETC. v. Office of Comptroller

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-12

Citation: 416 So. 2d 820

Snippet: regulations of the Florida Citrus Code. §§ 601.35, 601.52, 601.731, 601.90-601.9902, Fla. Stat. (1981). The

Rosslow v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-16

Citation: 401 So. 2d 1107

Snippet: ss. 601.45, 601.46, 601.48, 601.49, 601.51, and 601.52, the Department of Citrus under such precautionary

Tyler v. Tyler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-01-16

Citation: 108 So. 2d 312

Snippet: Fla. 447, 62 So. 362; Slorah v. Wilcox, 59 Fla. 601, 52 So. 12. "`The presumption is that the grantor was

Lamson v. Martin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-06-27

Citation: 104 So. 2d 117, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2950

Snippet: Fla. 447, 62 So. 362; Slorah v. Wilcox, 59 Fla. 601, 52 So. 12. “The presumption is that the grantor was

Quinn v. Phipps

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-04-11

Citation: 113 So. 419, 93 Fla. 805, 54 A.L.R. 1173, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 1180

Snippet: 87 So.2d Rep. 762; Slorah v. Wilcox, 59 Fla. 601, 52 So.2d Rep. 12. The evidence is legally sufficient

Lowrie v. Lowrie

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-07-23

Citation: 111 So. 288, 92 Fla. 337

Snippet: therefore affirmed. See Slorah v. Wilcox, 59 Fla. 601,52 So., 12; Baggott et al. v. Otis et al 65 Fla. 447

Travis v. Travis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-03-11

Citation: 81 Fla. 309, 87 So. 762, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 605

Snippet: South. Rep. 362; Slorah et al. v. Wilson, 59 Fla. 601, 52 South. Rep. 12. The presumption is that the grantor