CopyCited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76076, 2009 WL 2579039
...Plaintiffs argued at oral argument that they were filing a brand new case in Florida, which they were entitled to do under the statute of limitations, and the 2005 RULPA gave the limited partners "the right" to bring a direct action. Plaintiffs cannot rely on the "savings clause" of § 620.2205 which states: "This act does not affect an action commenced, proceeding brought, or right accrued before this act takes effect" because, as they argue in their brief, "Plaintiffs' right to maintain a direct action accrued ......
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural