Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 626.8411 (2025)
Application of Florida Insurance Code provisions to title insurance agents or agencies.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
626.8411 Application of Florida Insurance Code provisions to title insurance agents or agencies.—
(1) The following provisions applicable to general lines agents or agencies also apply to title insurance agents or agencies:
(a) Section 626.734, relating to liability of certain agents.
(b) Section 626.0428(4)(a) and (b), relating to branch agencies.
(c) Section 626.749, relating to place of business in residence.
(d) Section 626.753, relating to sharing of commissions.
(e) Section 626.754, relating to rights of agent following termination of appointment.
(f) Section 626.172(2)(f), relating to fingerprints.
(2) The following provisions of part I do not apply to title insurance agents or title insurance agencies:
(a) Section 626.112(7), relating to licensing of insurance agencies.
(b) Section 626.231, relating to eligibility for examination.
(c) Section 626.572, relating to rebating, when allowed.
(d) Section 626.172, except for paragraph (2)(f) of that section, relating to agent in full-time charge.
(e) Section 626.173(1)(c), relating to notifying policyholders of the agency closure.
History.—s. 12, ch. 92-318; s. 45, ch. 98-199; s. 4, ch. 99-286; s. 37, ch. 2002-206; s. 29, ch. 2005-257; s. 85, ch. 2006-1; s. 24, ch. 2012-209; s. 23, ch. 2014-123; s. 37, ch. 2022-138; s. 25, ch. 2023-144.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Butler v. State, Dept. of Ins., 680 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Butler v. State, Dept. of Ins., 680 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). “776(2)(a) was not applicable to title insurance. They contend that any rebate or abatement of commission is unlawful as to title agents.”
— 626.8411(2) — 1 case
Butler v. State, Dept. of Ins., 680 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). “776(2)(a) was not applicable to title insurance. They contend that any rebate or abatement of commission is unlawful as to title agents.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.