Cases from cite.case.law:

ESSEX INSURANCE CO. v. INTEGRATED DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. a a a LLC, a a a, 124 So. 3d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The court opined that section 627.021(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2003), which stated that “[t]his chapter . . . F.S., as authorized insurers due to a specific exemption provision for surplus lines under [ section 627.021 . . . 1,1988, the effective date of a law enacted in 1988 adding the surplus lines exemption to [section 627.021 . . .

VISION I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 643 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Specifically, Section 627.021(2)(e) states that “[t]his chapter does not apply to ...” . . . FSLSO, a “self-regulating organization,” as to what the Legislature intended by Sections 627.701(8) or 627.021 . . . Prior to that case, the Florida Supreme Court had already addressed the wording of Section 627.021(2) . . . Chapter 627 is divided at this time into eighteen parts ... section 627.021 is located in part I, entitled . . . Accordingly, the Court finds that the exclusion of Section 627.021(2)(e) did not apply to the entire . . .

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ZOTA,, 607 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Supreme Court stated that: this Court has previously held that-under a full statutory analysis-section 627.021 . . . structure and organization of chapter 627, demonstrate that the exclusionary provisions of section 627.021 . . . Florida Statute § 627.021 provides that: (1) This part of this chapter applies only to property, casualty . . .

SHARP GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. v. MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 604 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Sta. 627.021(2)(e), the court held that under a full statutory analysis, section 627.021(2) applies only . . .

CNL HOTELS RESORTS, INC. a v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a a, 291 F. App'x 220 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . The court interpreted section 627.021(2)(e) of the Florida statutes, which states that “[tjhis chapter . . . Stat. § 627.021(2), as exempting surplus lines insurance from the filing requirements of section 627.410 . . . The exemptions of section 627.021 only apply to part 1 of chapter 627. Essex, 985 So.2d at 1042. . . . Court of Florida stated that it had “previously held that — under a full statutory analysis — section 627.021 . . .

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ZOTA,, 985 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Essex, however, contends that by force of section 627.021(2)(e), chapter 627 — in its entirety — does . . . See § 627.021(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2003) (“This chapter does not apply to ... . . . M/V Manaure V, this Court addressed the question of whether section 627.021(2)(c), Florida Statutes ( . . . Thus, the Legislature only intended for the exclusionary provisions of section 627.021(2) to apply to . . . See ch. 88-166, § 2, Laws of Fla.; § 627.021(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1988). . . .

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ZOTA, R. A. Co., 466 F.3d 981 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 627.021, none of Chapter 627 applies to them. . . . Stat. § 627.021(2) (emphasis added). . . . It did not mention the amendment to § 627.021. . . . Stat. § 627.021.... . . . Essex contends that, although the title of § 627.021 might create some ambiguity, the language of § 627.021 . . .

NATIONAL CORPORACION VENEZOLANA, S. A. v. M V MANAURE V,, 511 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 1987)

. . . However, in light of the marine insurance exclusion found in section 627.021(2), Florida Statutes (1983 . . . National Corporación Venezolana argues that section 627.021 unambiguously excludes marine insurance from . . . A look at the legislative histories of the Florida Insurance Code and section 627.021 is instructive. . . . It is clear from the language of section 627.021 as enrolled that the word “chapter” refers only to “ . . . This analysis of section 627.021’s legislative history, coupled with the presence within chapter 627 . . .

STEELMET, INC. R. v. CARIBE TOWING CORP. Co. J. Co., 779 F.2d 1485 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 627.021(2), producing a result that maritime insurers are still subject to the Shingleton common . . .