Florida Statute 627.727 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS

View Entire Chapter

627.727 Motor vehicle insurance; uninsured and underinsured vehicle coverage; insolvent insurer protection.—

(1) No motor vehicle liability insurance policy which provides bodily injury liability coverage shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this state with respect to any specifically insured or identified motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state unless uninsured motor vehicle coverage is provided therein or supplemental thereto for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles because of bodily injury, sickness, or disease, including death, resulting therefrom. However, the coverage required under this section is not applicable when, or to the extent that, an insured named in the policy makes a written rejection of the coverage on behalf of all insureds under the policy. When a motor vehicle is leased for a period of 1 year or longer and the lessor of such vehicle, by the terms of the lease contract, provides liability coverage on the leased vehicle, the lessee of such vehicle shall have the sole privilege to reject uninsured motorist coverage or to select lower limits than the bodily injury liability limits, regardless of whether the lessor is qualified as a self-insurer pursuant to s. 324.171. Unless an insured, or lessee having the privilege of rejecting uninsured motorist coverage, requests such coverage or requests higher uninsured motorist limits in writing, the coverage or such higher uninsured motorist limits need not be provided in or supplemental to any other policy which renews, extends, changes, supersedes, or replaces an existing policy with the same bodily injury liability limits when an insured or lessee had rejected the coverage. When an insured or lessee has initially selected limits of uninsured motorist coverage lower than her or his bodily injury liability limits, higher limits of uninsured motorist coverage need not be provided in or supplemental to any other policy which renews, extends, changes, supersedes, or replaces an existing policy with the same bodily injury liability limits unless an insured requests higher uninsured motorist coverage in writing. The rejection or selection of lower limits shall be made on a form approved by the office. The form shall fully advise the applicant of the nature of the coverage and shall state that the coverage is equal to bodily injury liability limits unless lower limits are requested or the coverage is rejected. The heading of the form shall be in 12-point bold type and shall state: “You are electing not to purchase certain valuable coverage which protects you and your family or you are purchasing uninsured motorist limits less than your bodily injury liability limits when you sign this form. Please read carefully.” If this form is signed by a named insured, it will be conclusively presumed that there was an informed, knowing rejection of coverage or election of lower limits on behalf of all insureds. The insurer shall notify the named insured at least annually of her or his options as to the coverage required by this section. Such notice shall be part of, and attached to, the notice of premium, shall provide for a means to allow the insured to request such coverage, and shall be given in a manner approved by the office. Receipt of this notice does not constitute an affirmative waiver of the insured’s right to uninsured motorist coverage where the insured has not signed a selection or rejection form. The coverage described under this section shall be over and above, but shall not duplicate, the benefits available to an insured under any workers’ compensation law, personal injury protection benefits, disability benefits law, or similar law; under any automobile medical expense coverage; under any motor vehicle liability insurance coverage; or from the owner or operator of the uninsured motor vehicle or any other person or organization jointly or severally liable together with such owner or operator for the accident; and such coverage shall cover the difference, if any, between the sum of such benefits and the damages sustained, up to the maximum amount of such coverage provided under this section. The amount of coverage available under this section shall not be reduced by a setoff against any coverage, including liability insurance. Such coverage shall not inure directly or indirectly to the benefit of any workers’ compensation or disability benefits carrier or any person or organization qualifying as a self-insurer under any workers’ compensation or disability benefits law or similar law.

(2) The limits of uninsured motorist coverage shall be not less than the limits of bodily injury liability insurance purchased by the named insured, or such lower limit complying with the rating plan of the company as may be selected by the named insured. The limits set forth in this subsection, and the provisions of subsection (1) which require uninsured motorist coverage to be provided in every motor vehicle policy delivered or issued for delivery in this state, do not apply to any policy which does not provide primary liability insurance that includes coverage for liabilities arising from the maintenance, operation, or use of a specifically insured motor vehicle. However, an insurer issuing such a policy shall make available as a part of the application for such policy, and at the written request of an insured, limits up to the bodily injury liability limits contained in such policy or $1 million, whichever is less.

(3) For the purpose of this coverage, the term “uninsured motor vehicle” shall, subject to the terms and conditions of such coverage, be deemed to include an insured motor vehicle when the liability insurer thereof:

(a) Is unable to make payment with respect to the legal liability of its insured within the limits specified therein because of insolvency;

(b) Has provided limits of bodily injury liability for its insured which are less than the total damages sustained by the person legally entitled to recover damages; or

(c) Excludes liability coverage to a nonfamily member whose operation of an insured vehicle results in injuries to the named insured or to a relative of the named insured who is a member of the named insured’s household.

(4) An insurer’s insolvency protection shall be applicable only to accidents occurring during a policy period in which its insured’s uninsured motorist coverage is in effect when the liability insurer of the tortfeasor becomes insolvent within 4 years after such an accident. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent any insurer from affording insolvency protection under terms and conditions more favorable to its insureds than is provided hereunder.

(5) Any person having a claim against an insolvent insurer as defined in s. 631.54 under this section shall present such claim for payment to the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association only. In the event of a payment to a person in settlement of a claim arising under this section, the association is not subrogated or entitled to recovery against the claimant’s insurer. The association, however, has the rights of recovery as set forth in chapter 631 in the proceeds recoverable from the assets of the insolvent insurer.

(6)(a) If an injured person or, in the case of death, the personal representative agrees to settle a claim with a liability insurer and its insured, and such settlement would not fully satisfy the claim for personal injuries or wrongful death so as to create an underinsured motorist claim, then written notice of the proposed settlement must be submitted by certified or registered mail to all underinsured motorist insurers that provide coverage. The underinsured motorist insurer then has a period of 30 days after receipt thereof to consider authorization of the settlement or retention of subrogation rights. If an underinsured motorist insurer authorizes settlement or fails to respond as required by paragraph (b) to the settlement request within the 30-day period, the injured party may proceed to execute a full release in favor of the underinsured motorist’s liability insurer and its insured and finalize the proposed settlement without prejudice to any underinsured motorist claim.

(b) If an underinsured motorist insurer chooses to preserve its subrogation rights by refusing permission to settle, the underinsured motorist insurer must, within 30 days after receipt of the notice of the proposed settlement, pay to the injured party the amount of the written offer from the underinsured motorist’s liability insurer. Thereafter, upon final resolution of the underinsured motorist claim, the underinsured motorist insurer is entitled to seek subrogation against the underinsured motorist and the liability insurer for the amounts paid to the injured party.

(c) The underinsured motorist insurer is entitled to a credit against total damages in the amount of the limits of the underinsured motorist’s liability policy in all cases to which this subsection applies, even if the settlement with the underinsured motorist under paragraph (a) or the payment by the underinsured motorist insurer under paragraph (b) is for less than the underinsured motorist’s full liability policy limits. The term “total damages” as used in this section means the full amount of damages determined to have been sustained by the injured party, regardless of the amount of underinsured motorist coverage. Nothing in this subsection, including any payment or credit under this subsection, reduces or affects the total amount of underinsured motorist coverage available to the injured party.

(7) The legal liability of an uninsured motorist coverage insurer does not include damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience unless the injury or disease is described in one or more of paragraphs (a)-(d) of s. 627.737(2).

(8) Insurers may offer policies of uninsured motorist coverage containing policy provisions, in language approved by the office, establishing that if the insured accepts this offer:

(a) The coverage provided as to two or more motor vehicles shall not be added together to determine the limit of insurance coverage available to an injured person for any one accident, except as provided in paragraph (c).

(b) If at the time of the accident the injured person is occupying a motor vehicle, the uninsured motorist coverage available to her or him is the coverage available as to that motor vehicle.

(c) If the injured person is occupying a motor vehicle which is not owned by her or him or by a family member residing with her or him, the injured person is entitled to the highest limits of uninsured motorist coverage afforded for any one vehicle as to which she or he is a named insured or insured family member. Such coverage shall be excess over the coverage on the vehicle the injured person is occupying.

(d) The uninsured motorist coverage provided by the policy does not apply to the named insured or family members residing in her or his household who are injured while occupying any vehicle owned by such insureds for which uninsured motorist coverage was not purchased.

(e) If, at the time of the accident the injured person is not occupying a motor vehicle, she or he is entitled to select any one limit of uninsured motorist coverage for any one vehicle afforded by a policy under which she or he is insured as a named insured or as an insured resident of the named insured’s household.

In connection with the offer authorized by this subsection, insurers shall inform the named insured, applicant, or lessee, on a form approved by the office, of the limitations imposed under this subsection and that such coverage is an alternative to coverage without such limitations. If this form is signed by a named insured, applicant, or lessee, it shall be conclusively presumed that there was an informed, knowing acceptance of such limitations on behalf of all insureds. When the named insured, applicant, or lessee has initially accepted such limitations, such acceptance shall apply to any policy which renews, extends, changes, supersedes, or replaces an existing policy unless the named insured requests deletion of such limitations and pays the appropriate premium for such coverage. Any insurer who provides coverage which includes the limitations provided in this subsection shall file revised premium rates with the office for such uninsured motorist coverage to take effect prior to initially providing such coverage. The revised rates shall reflect the anticipated reduction in loss costs attributable to such limitations but shall in any event reflect a reduction in the uninsured motorist coverage premium of at least 20 percent for policies with such limitations. Such filing shall not increase the rates for coverage which does not contain the limitations authorized by this subsection, and such rates shall remain in effect until the insurer demonstrates the need for a change in uninsured motorist rates pursuant to s. 627.0651.

(9) The damages recoverable from an uninsured motorist carrier in an action brought under s. 624.155 shall include the total amount of the claimant’s damages, including the amount in excess of the policy limits, any interest on unpaid benefits, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and any damages caused by a violation of a law of this state. The total amount of the claimant’s damages is recoverable whether caused by an insurer or by a third-party tortfeasor.

History.—s. 1, ch. 61-175; s. 1, ch. 63-148; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 19, ch. 70-20; s. 1, ch. 71-88; s. 182, ch. 71-355; s. 20, ch. 71-970; ss. 3, 4, ch. 73-180; s. 165, ch. 73-333; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 3, ch. 76-266; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 30, ch. 77-468; s. 1, ch. 78-374; s. 113, ch. 79-40; ss. 2, 3, ch. 79-241; ss. 1, 2, ch. 80-396; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 544, 563, 809(2nd), ch. 82-243; ss. 66, 79, ch. 82-386; s. 1, ch. 84-41; s. 16, ch. 85-62; s. 7, ch. 86-182; s. 1, ch. 87-213; s. 15, ch. 88-370; s. 2, ch. 89-238; s. 1, ch. 89-243; s. 39, ch. 90-119; ss. 79, 114, ch. 92-318; s. 358, ch. 97-102; s. 1190, ch. 2003-261; s. 30, ch. 2006-12; s. 1, ch. 2013-195; s. 4, ch. 2015-65; s. 21, ch. 2023-15.

F.S. 627.727 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.727 on CourtListener

Amendments to 627.727

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 627.727

Total Results: 610

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet

658 So. 2d 55, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 173, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 569, 1995 WL 231202

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1995 | Docket: 2518225

Cited 197 times | Published

of great public importance: WHETHER AMENDED SECTION 627.727(10), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1992), IS A REMEDIAL

Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

575 So. 2d 1289, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 203, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 429, 1991 WL 33020

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1991 | Docket: 2514582

Cited 148 times | Published

Constitution. [2] The suit was brought pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985), which provides in

Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

410 So. 2d 501

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1982 | Docket: 421756

Cited 142 times | Published

rejection of uninsured motorist coverage under section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977). Appellants claim

Vest v. Travelers Ins. Co.

753 So. 2d 1270, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 177, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 484, 2000 WL 232281

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2000 | Docket: 2515500

Cited 92 times | Published

Vest and the tortfeasor in accordance with section 627.727(6)(a), Florida Statutes. An order approving

Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

363 So. 2d 1077

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1978 | Docket: 467698

Cited 91 times | Published

vehicles. Finally, the appellant contended that Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), required uninsured

Rollins v. Pizzarelli

761 So. 2d 294, 2000 WL 551032

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2000 | Docket: 1299957

Cited 90 times | Published

Legislature, by using the term "payable" in section 627.727(3), intended to limit the setoff from damages

Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.

35 So. 3d 873, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 222, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 581, 2010 WL 1609785

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 2515595

Cited 79 times | Published

retroactively. In Laforet, this Court held that section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes, which imposed a penalty

Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster

984 So. 2d 478, 2008 WL 596700

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1288177

Cited 68 times | Published

though the Legislature expressly stated that section 627.727(10), Fla. Stat., was remedial and was to be

Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.

753 So. 2d 80, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 86, 2000 WL 144188

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2000 | Docket: 592622

Cited 63 times | Published

or operators of uninsured motor vehicles.... § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1995).[1] As we explained in Allstate

Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

674 So. 2d 106, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 333, 1996 WL 97455

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1996 | Docket: 1194769

Cited 61 times | Published

wherein the Second District Court of Appeal held section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), unconstitutional

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Roach

945 So. 2d 1160, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 840, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2877, 2006 WL 3630072

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2006 | Docket: 2582044

Cited 60 times | Published

Accordingly, we held that the requirement of section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), that automobile

Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

288 So. 2d 238

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1973 | Docket: 1326480

Cited 55 times | Published

appears in Florida Statutes 1969 and F.S. Section 627.727, F.S.A., as the latter appears in Florida Statutes

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boynton

486 So. 2d 552, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 97

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1986 | Docket: 467697

Cited 51 times | Published

may be an "uninsured motor vehicle" under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1978),[1] even

Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

352 So. 2d 1172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1977 | Docket: 1694081

Cited 50 times | Published

argument that this exclusion conflicts with Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975). We have considered

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Ruiz

899 So. 2d 1121, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 219, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 612, 2005 WL 774838

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2005 | Docket: 2518601

Cited 45 times | Published

claims have been rebuked by the Legislature. See § 627.727(10), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992) (superseding McLeod

Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.

531 So. 2d 84, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 831, 1988 WL 97201

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 2527053

Cited 40 times | Published

written waiver of UM coverage as required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981). Pierce further

Race v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

542 So. 2d 347, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 75, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 122, 1989 WL 14973

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1989 | Docket: 468818

Cited 38 times | Published

disease, including death, resulting therefrom." § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). As this Court said in Mullis

Flores v. Allstate Ins. Co.

819 So. 2d 740, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 499, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1093, 2002 WL 1028332

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2002 | Docket: 2527551

Cited 37 times | Published

expressly rejected the coverage. See generally § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1997). UM coverage serves a different

Nat. Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United Serv. Auto. Ass'n

400 So. 2d 526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 2034683

Cited 36 times | Published

324.021(8), Florida Statutes (1979).[3] In Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979), the Legislature

Leatherby Insurance Company v. Willoughby

315 So. 2d 553, 72 A.L.R. 3d 1156, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1975 | Docket: 439941

Cited 35 times | Published

for our conclusions herein. The first is that § 627.727(1), F.S. 1971, which requires uninsured motorist

Valiant Ins. Co. v. Webster

567 So. 2d 408, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 405, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 965, 1990 WL 107462

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1990 | Docket: 2552098

Cited 31 times | Published

question were contrary to the requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), and reversed

Kimbrell v. Great American Ins. Co.

420 So. 2d 1086, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2571

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1982 | Docket: 1306703

Cited 31 times | Published

policy. Petitioner invoked the provisions of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975), which requires

Ellsworth v. Ins. Co. of North America

508 So. 2d 395, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1115, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1987 | Docket: 1648890

Cited 30 times | Published

contention, INA argued the 1984 amendment to section 627.727, Florida Statutes, served to clarify the 1981

Coleman v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc.

517 So. 2d 686, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 13, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 18, 1988 WL 1514

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1988 | Docket: 26662

Cited 27 times | Published

limits of the liability coverage. Relying on section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1981), petitioners contend

Arrieta v. Volkswagen Ins. Co.

343 So. 2d 918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1977 | Docket: 1304295

Cited 27 times | Published

in uninsured motorist coverage, pursuant to Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975),[1] may, by petition

Time Ins. Co., Inc. v. Burger

712 So. 2d 389, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 309, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1157, 1998 WL 309272

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 1737236

Cited 26 times | Published

by the legislature through the enactment of section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (1997). Burger also points

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Green

327 So. 2d 65, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1976 | Docket: 1364329

Cited 25 times | Published

in the policy shall reject the coverage... .., § 627.727(1), Florida Statutes. The record and briefs present

Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Smith

556 So. 2d 393, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 15, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 155, 1990 WL 3852

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1990 | Docket: 542712

Cited 24 times | Published

motorist's coverage applicable to the injured person. § 627.727(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1985). Subsection 627.727(1)

Bueno v. Workman

20 So. 3d 993, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16087, 2009 WL 3446420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 1639946

Cited 23 times | Published

necessarily duplicate liability coverage. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2008) (uninsured and underinsured

Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co.

400 So. 2d 496, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1981 | Docket: 1676915

Cited 23 times | Published

personal injury protection benefits and of section 627.727(1), Florida Statute (1979), relating to uninsured

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Yates

368 So. 2d 634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1979 | Docket: 1389024

Cited 21 times | Published

of the signatures which stated that under Section 627.727 of the Florida Statutes the company was required

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Warren

678 So. 2d 324, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 315, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1238, 1996 WL 399854

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1996 | Docket: 1470823

Cited 20 times | Published

court of appeal reversed, concluding that section 627.727(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1989),[1] overrode

Quirk v. Anthony

563 So. 2d 710, 1990 WL 52319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 1682967

Cited 20 times | Published

to West Coast with its annual premium notice. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1984). It is undisputed

Continental Ins. Co. v. Howe

488 So. 2d 917, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1203, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1986 | Docket: 1287685

Cited 20 times | Published

these states have a different type of statute. Section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1985), *920 requires

Saudi Arabian Airlines Corp. v. Dunn

438 So. 2d 116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1983 | Docket: 1731708

Cited 20 times | Published

for $90,000.00. In its brief, Iowa relies on Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), for its contention

Ivey v. Chicago Ins. Co.

410 So. 2d 494, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2350

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1982 | Docket: 477654

Cited 20 times | Published

uninsured motor vehicle as that term is defined in section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court

Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Sheffield

375 So. 2d 598, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1979 | Docket: 1352744

Cited 20 times | Published

written rejection of UM coverage as provided by Section 627.727(1), and no UM protection was in fact provided

Metro. Property and Liability Ins. Co. v. Gray

446 So. 2d 216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1984 | Docket: 1780077

Cited 19 times | Published

policy. In that case, the applicable version of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979), required insurance

Williams v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

382 So. 2d 1216

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1980 | Docket: 1674250

Cited 19 times | Published

petitioners' policy with Hartford is governed by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1971). The portions of the

Lee v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

339 So. 2d 670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1976 | Docket: 2517904

Cited 19 times | Published

under the Florida uninsured motorist statute, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes. The purpose of the statute

Golphin v. Home Indemnity Company

284 So. 2d 442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1973 | Docket: 1426769

Cited 19 times | Published

subject insurance contract and Florida Statute § 627.727, where there is applicable liability insurance

Golphin v. Home Indemnity Company

284 So. 2d 442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1973 | Docket: 1426769

Cited 19 times | Published

subject insurance contract and Florida Statute § 627.727, where there is applicable liability insurance

MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc. v. Mastec, Inc.

995 So. 2d 221, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 473, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1239, 2008 WL 2678024

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2008 | Docket: 403616

Cited 18 times | Published

621 (Fla.1992), superseded on other grounds by § 627.727(10), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992). Compensatory damages

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Douglas

654 So. 2d 118, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 113, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 378, 1995 WL 94425

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1995 | Docket: 2518607

Cited 18 times | Published

because the insurer failed to comply with section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1987). We have jurisdiction

Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bourke

607 So. 2d 418, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 680, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1866, 1992 WL 318438

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1992 | Docket: 1526270

Cited 18 times | Published

vehicle is not an uninsured motor vehicle under section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987). The relevant portion

Marchesano v. NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. INS.

506 So. 2d 410, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 199

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1987 | Docket: 1086363

Cited 18 times | Published

UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 627.727(1), FLORIDA STATUTES (1982)? Nationwide Property

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Spencer

397 So. 2d 358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1981 | Docket: 1357359

Cited 18 times | Published

contrary to the public policy as expressed in Section 627.727(1). Travelers next argues that the lower court

Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v. Beaver

355 So. 2d 441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1978 | Docket: 1715123

Cited 18 times | Published

that appellant did not *443 fully comply with Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1971) in issuing the

Johns v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

337 So. 2d 830, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1976 | Docket: 1415376

Cited 18 times | Published

coverage pursuant to § 627.0851 F.S. 1967 [now § 627.727 F.S.] The policy provided that the term "uninsured

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Graff

327 So. 2d 88

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1976 | Docket: 237358

Cited 18 times | Published

vehicle benefits paid Stokeley is governed by § 627.727(1), F.S. 1973, which requires GEICO to provide

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Quirk

583 So. 2d 1026, 1991 WL 117536

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1991 | Docket: 371679

Cited 17 times | Published

coverage from West Coast in accordance with section 627.727, Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

369 So. 2d 410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1979 | Docket: 1516686

Cited 17 times | Published

ipso facto provided pursuant to the terms of Section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975); a person thus-insured

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. v. Tepper

2 So. 3d 209, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 111, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 143, 2009 WL 217978

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 1138556

Cited 16 times | Published

Metropolitan. This case involves interpretation of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2004), and the timing of

Bifulco v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

693 So. 2d 707, 1997 WL 269068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1997 | Docket: 435226

Cited 16 times | Published

policies as required by Florida Insurance Code Section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes. The facts giving rise

Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Langel

587 So. 2d 1370, 1991 WL 193326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1991 | Docket: 1405830

Cited 16 times | Published

if it duplicates damages otherwise awarded. Section 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1989); Geico v. Brewton, 538

American Fire & Indem. Co. v. Spaulding

442 So. 2d 206, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3145

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1983 | Docket: 972426

Cited 16 times | Published

fourth district's opinion in Spaulding. [2] § 627.727(2) states: (2) The limits of uninsured motorist

Cohen v. American Home Assur. Co.

367 So. 2d 677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1979 | Docket: 1697784

Cited 16 times | Published

"8. The Florida Uninsured Motorist Statute, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes, in pertinent part, provides:

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Diem

358 So. 2d 39, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1978 | Docket: 1691030

Cited 16 times | Published

vehicle and therefore an uninsured vehicle under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975). Subsequent to the

US Fire Ins. Co. v. Van Iderstyne

347 So. 2d 672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1977 | Docket: 273741

Cited 16 times | Published

1973 Chapter 73-180 took effect to amend Section 627.727, Florida Statutes by providing that all insurance

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Anderson

332 So. 2d 623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1976 | Docket: 1691918

Cited 16 times | Published

to submit to arbitration, and 2) pursuant to § 627.727(2)(b) F.S. 1973, appellees were entitled to "stack"

Brookins v. Goodson

640 So. 2d 110, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1994 | Docket: 2518026

Cited 15 times | Published

Subsequent to McLeod, the legislature amended section 627.727 to permit a first party insured in a bad faith

Adams v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

574 So. 2d 1142, 1991 WL 10399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1991 | Docket: 1436646

Cited 15 times | Published

availability of such coverage as required by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1982 Supp.). Adams seeks

Jernigan v. Progressive American Ins. Co.

501 So. 2d 748, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 454, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 1527613

Cited 15 times | Published

public policy established by the legislature in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985). We begin with the

Varro v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.

854 So. 2d 726, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12538, 2003 WL 21990647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 1747338

Cited 14 times | Published

coverage for other insureds. We conclude that section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1999), does not authorize

Weesner v. United Services Auto. Ass'n

711 So. 2d 1192, 1998 WL 199662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1998 | Docket: 1700537

Cited 14 times | Published

does not contain the same requirements as § 627.727(1); § 627.727(2) only requires an issuer of a non-primary

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Olah

662 So. 2d 980, 1995 WL 621559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 471409

Cited 14 times | Published

[3] After Brixius the legislature amended section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes (1991), by adding subsection

Chicago Ins. Co. v. Dominguez

420 So. 2d 882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1982 | Docket: 1306771

Cited 14 times | Published

000 uninsured motorist coverage pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), because Dominguez

Carter v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.

377 So. 2d 242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1979 | Docket: 1521751

Cited 14 times | Published

Chapter 79-241, Laws of Florida (1979) amending Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), clarifies legislative

Adrian Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

185 So. 3d 1214, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 62, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 394, 2016 WL 743258

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2016 | Docket: 3039161

Cited 13 times | Published

Illinois, in accordance with the provisions of § 627.727.” That section provides that the *1217damages

Woodall v. Travelers Indem. Co.

699 So. 2d 1361, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 614, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1511, 1997 WL 602709

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1997 | Docket: 1321021

Cited 13 times | Published

by denying the claim.[2] They contend that section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1987), enacted subsequent

Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Koven

402 So. 2d 1352, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1981 | Docket: 1691411

Cited 13 times | Published

coverage limits of $100,000/$300,000. We reverse. Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1973), effective at the

Decker v. Great American Ins. Co.

392 So. 2d 965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1980 | Docket: 2517236

Cited 13 times | Published

determination, strictly construed the language of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979), as pertaining

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Bergman

387 So. 2d 494, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1980 | Docket: 2486048

Cited 13 times | Published

Ins. Co., 377 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), is the applicable

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Bergman

387 So. 2d 494, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1980 | Docket: 2486048

Cited 13 times | Published

Ins. Co., 377 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), is the applicable

Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Taylor

342 So. 2d 547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1977 | Docket: 388713

Cited 13 times | Published

statute, § 627.727(2)(b), Fla. Stat. 1975, to allow such stacking. We disagree and reverse. § 627.727(2)(b)

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rudnick

761 So. 2d 289, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 329, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 825, 2000 WL 551033

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2000 | Docket: 1300135

Cited 12 times | Published

benefits were available within the meaning of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1993), pertaining to

Medina v. Peralta

724 So. 2d 1188, 1999 WL 20627

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1999 | Docket: 1734047

Cited 12 times | Published

this Court held that "in actions to which section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991), is applicable

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Krawzak

675 So. 2d 115, 1996 WL 296520

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1996 | Docket: 1322927

Cited 12 times | Published

joined in an action against a tortfeasor under section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991), is a party in

Haas v. Zaccaria

659 So. 2d 1130, 1995 WL 455437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1995 | Docket: 1462212

Cited 12 times | Published

Jr., Senior Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Compare § 627.727(2), Fla. Stat. (1993) (claimant in tort action

Brixius v. Allstate Ins. Co.

589 So. 2d 236, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 639, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1698, 1991 WL 194207

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1991 | Docket: 1441865

Cited 12 times | Published

decision in Reid the legislature has not amended section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987), to require uninsured

Del Prado v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

400 So. 2d 115, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 1263557

Cited 12 times | Published

requirement of a written rejection is supported by Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1971), and State Insurance

American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Weingarten

355 So. 2d 821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1978 | Docket: 2572779

Cited 12 times | Published

reject coverage to that extent, as provided in Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975); and (b) the insured

Suarez v. Aguiar

351 So. 2d 1086

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1977 | Docket: 1246558

Cited 12 times | Published

intentional tort were recoverable. The statute, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1973), provides that damages

Main Ins. Co. v. Wiggins

349 So. 2d 638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1977 | Docket: 1655143

Cited 12 times | Published

motorist benefits would be payable to appellee under § 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1975), only if he himself

Standard Marine Ins. Co. v. Allyn

333 So. 2d 497, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1976 | Docket: 1290948

Cited 12 times | Published

outset that the uninsured motorist statute, F.S. 627.727, is not a part of the Florida Automobile Reparations

Ferreiro v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.

928 So. 2d 374, 2006 WL 547788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 1713762

Cited 11 times | Published

underinsured motorist coverage pursuant to section 627.727(2), Florida Statute (1997),[2] and (2) damages

Strochak v. Federal Ins. Co.

717 So. 2d 453, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 157, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 471, 1998 WL 718068

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1998 | Docket: 180182

Cited 11 times | Published

MOTORISTS COVERAGE REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE § 627.727(2) TO AN INSURED UNDER AN EXISTING POLICY ON VEHICLES

Bulone v. United Services Auto. Ass'n

660 So. 2d 399, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9705, 1995 WL 544879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 1755802

Cited 11 times | Published

AMENDMENT In 1989, the legislature amended section 627.727, in pertinent part, deleting and adding language

Carbonell v. Automobile Ins. Co.

562 So. 2d 437, 1990 WL 82479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1990 | Docket: 1674620

Cited 11 times | Published

However, after Mullis, the legislature amended section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1989), to allow insurers

Trezza v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS CO.

519 So. 2d 649, 1988 WL 344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1988 | Docket: 1332275

Cited 11 times | Published

We agree. The legislative purpose behind section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985), is to provide coverage

New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Knight

506 So. 2d 75, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1133, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1987 | Docket: 1700317

Cited 11 times | Published

determine whether it will approve the settlement. Section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes provides: (6) If an injured

Cooper v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

485 So. 2d 1367, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1986 | Docket: 1275985

Cited 11 times | Published

enforce his insurance contract. On the basis of section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes (1983), which Aetna argued

Pena v. Allstate Ins. Co.

463 So. 2d 1256, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 611

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1985 | Docket: 1160911

Cited 11 times | Published

because of bodily injury resulting therefrom. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1983). The purpose of uninsured

New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. Woodward

456 So. 2d 552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1984 | Docket: 1447606

Cited 11 times | Published

the liability coverage limits of the policy, § 627.727(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983), because this requirement

Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Lackore

408 So. 2d 1040

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1982 | Docket: 1449868

Cited 11 times | Published

benefits. On appeal, the district court held that section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), did not allow

Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Lackore

408 So. 2d 1040

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1982 | Docket: 1449868

Cited 11 times | Published

benefits. On appeal, the district court held that section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), did not allow

US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Waln

395 So. 2d 1211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 1692964

Cited 11 times | Published

questions of statutory interpretation involving Section 627.727(1) Florida Statutes, pertaining to Uninsured/Underinsured

Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Burak

373 So. 2d 89

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1979 | Docket: 2530558

Cited 11 times | Published

authorized expansion of the UM coverage required by Section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes (1973)[1] which provides:

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Wilson

371 So. 2d 145, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1979 | Docket: 1786729

Cited 11 times | Published

coverage applicable to the injured person." Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977) The plaintiff insurer

Riccio v. Allstate Ins. Co.

357 So. 2d 420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1978 | Docket: 454028

Cited 11 times | Published

at the time of the issuance of the policy, Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (effective January 1,

Bassette v. Standard Fire Ins. Co.

803 So. 2d 744, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9204, 2001 WL 754417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2001 | Docket: 1785202

Cited 10 times | Published

motorist cases. Standard Fire, however, relies on section 627.727(8), which states: "The provisions of s. 627

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rush

777 So. 2d 1027, 2000 WL 1873051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 1513940

Cited 10 times | Published

It alleged that, under Florida Statutes, section 627.727(6)(c) (1993), it should receive a setoff of

Vegas v. Globe SEC.

627 So. 2d 76, 1993 WL 477628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1993 | Docket: 1752920

Cited 10 times | Published

of section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes (1985). In 1984, the Legislature amended section 627.727(1) to

Diversified Services, Inc. v. Avila

606 So. 2d 364, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 619, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1797, 1992 WL 289665

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1992 | Docket: 230922

Cited 10 times | Published

issues presented in this case are: 1) whether section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1989),[1] requires a

Lipof v. Florida Power and Light Co.

596 So. 2d 1005, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 117, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 243, 1992 WL 27891

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1992 | Docket: 1707232

Cited 10 times | Published

insurance, *1007 therefore, the requirements in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), are inapplicable

Lipof v. Florida Power & Light Co.

558 So. 2d 1067, 1990 WL 26208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1990 | Docket: 1363006

Cited 10 times | Published

that it owed no duty to appellant pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), because it was appellant's

Carguillo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

529 So. 2d 276, 1988 WL 59159

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1988 | Docket: 1523794

Cited 10 times | Published

for public policy reasons. The policy behind section 627.727, Florida Statutes, is to provide *278 the insured

Carguillo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

529 So. 2d 276, 1988 WL 59159

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1988 | Docket: 1523794

Cited 10 times | Published

for public policy reasons. The policy behind section 627.727, Florida Statutes, is to provide *278 the insured

Vasquez v. Bankers Ins. Co.

502 So. 2d 894, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 90, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1490

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 1181230

Cited 10 times | Published

with the provision of Florida Insurance Code, Section 627.727 part X of Chapter 627, which permits the insured

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Bennett

466 So. 2d 242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1984 | Docket: 438746

Cited 10 times | Published

motorist coverage. That statute was renumbered as section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1981), which was in effect

Kerr v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

434 So. 2d 970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1983 | Docket: 1318458

Cited 10 times | Published

uninsured motorist coverage was then required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), and that such

Maxwell v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

399 So. 2d 1051, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1981 | Docket: 1167539

Cited 10 times | Published

constitutes a new policy within the meaning of Section 627.727(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1977). This statute

Cox v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

378 So. 2d 330, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1980 | Docket: 1795198

Cited 10 times | Published

about underinsured motorist coverage. However, Section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1973), modified its provisions

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wimpee

376 So. 2d 20, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1979 | Docket: 1734299

Cited 10 times | Published

is applicable to persons, not vehicles. See Section 627.727(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1977). Thus, a restriction

Jones v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Rhode Island

368 So. 2d 1289, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4594

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1979 | Docket: 1723031

Cited 10 times | Published

1077 (Fla. 1978), we had occasion to construe section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975), which reads in

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. White

330 So. 2d 858, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1976 | Docket: 1774671

Cited 10 times | Published

that he could "stack" his coverage. Fla. Stat. § 627.727, relating to uninsured motorist coverage was amended

Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. Johnson

307 So. 2d 229, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1975 | Docket: 1335155

Cited 10 times | Published

filed July 10, 1974. NOTES [1] Now numbered Section 627.727(1), F.S. [2] E.g., Tuggle v. Government Employees

Taylor v. Safeco Insurance Co.

298 So. 2d 202, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1974 | Docket: 1730212

Cited 10 times | Published

vehicle liability insurance coverage under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., is available to

Rando v. Government Employees Insurance

556 F.3d 1173, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2059, 2009 WL 225251

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 2, 2009 | Docket: 213407

Cited 9 times | Published

0851 was later re-codified at Florida Statutes § 627.727. Section 627.0851 did not contain any provision

Lamz v. Geico General Ins. Co.

803 So. 2d 593, 2001 WL 920133

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2001 | Docket: 1785369

Cited 9 times | Published

Court indicated that in actions pursuant to section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991)[1], it is appropriate

Premix-Marbletite Manufacturing Corp. v. SKW Chemicals, Inc.

145 F. Supp. 2d 1348, 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 77, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7809, 2001 WL 673454

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2001 | Docket: 388925

Cited 9 times | Published

choice of law provision contained in Fla. Stat. § 627.727, which requires insurance policies to provide

Esancy v. Hodges

727 So. 2d 308, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 1730131

Cited 9 times | Published

We are unable to discern which version of section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes, applies to this case

Gilmore v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.

708 So. 2d 679, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3734, 1998 WL 161284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1998 | Docket: 541881

Cited 9 times | Published

policy of the uninsured motorist statute [now § 627.727(1)] is to provide uniform and specific insurance

Baker v. United Services Auto. Ass'n

661 So. 2d 128, 1995 WL 594976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1995 | Docket: 532111

Cited 9 times | Published

Co., 578 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). [2] Section 627.727(9)(c), Florida Statutes (1993) provides: If

Loper v. Allstate Ins. Co.

616 So. 2d 1055, 1993 WL 96764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1993 | Docket: 1385433

Cited 9 times | Published

1990), wherein the supreme court held that section 627.727(8) limits the fee awardable under section 627

NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INS. v. Phillips

609 So. 2d 1385, 1992 WL 338535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1992 | Docket: 1738139

Cited 9 times | Published

The Phillipses acknowledge that, pursuant to section 627.727(9)(d), Florida Statutes, an insurer is able

US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Woolard

523 So. 2d 798, 1988 WL 36079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1988 | Docket: 1517266

Cited 9 times | Published

uninsured motorist provisions as required by section 627.727, Florida Statutes. Appellant filed a complaint

Bayles v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

483 So. 2d 402, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 607

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1985 | Docket: 1511960

Cited 9 times | Published

and answer the question in the negative. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983) mandates (with

William Thiem v. The Hertz Corporation, D/B/A the Hertz Corporation Car Leasing Division

732 F.2d 1559, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 399, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22116

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 29, 1984 | Docket: 1078069

Cited 9 times | Published

was deprived of its right under Fla.Stat.Ann. § 627.727 as a long-term lessee to have the sole privilege

Curtin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

449 So. 2d 293, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1984 | Docket: 1695846

Cited 9 times | Published

policy of Florida's Uninsured Motorist Statute. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), requires all insurers

Weinstein v. Am. Mut. Ins. Co. of Boston

376 So. 2d 1219, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1979 | Docket: 1734438

Cited 9 times | Published

intent of the uninsured/underinsured statute, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977). In Apodaca v. Old

Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Co. v. Andrews

369 So. 2d 346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1978 | Docket: 470795

Cited 9 times | Published

accident as is provided by Florida Statute Section 627.727(1) F.S.A." We are uncertain whether the trial

US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Gordon

359 So. 2d 480, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1978 | Docket: 1417396

Cited 9 times | Published

policy and the Uninsured Motorist Statute, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975). Gordon asserted by

Hunt v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

349 So. 2d 642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1977 | Docket: 1225556

Cited 9 times | Published

was granted, the court finding in part: "Florida Statute 627.727 (1973) and the cases construing it allow

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Mirth

333 So. 2d 545, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1976 | Docket: 1290950

Cited 9 times | Published

with the statutory provision to such effect, § 627.727, subparagraphs (2) (a), and (3).

Wilson v. National Indemnity Company

302 So. 2d 141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1974 | Docket: 1742201

Cited 9 times | Published

by law and must be affirmatively rejected, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes. It is only logical then

Catherine S. Cadle v. GEICO General Insurance Company

838 F.3d 1113, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17691, 2016 WL 5539815

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 30, 2016 | Docket: 4465758

Cited 8 times | Published

regarding threshold breach .[of Florida Statutes § 627.727(7) ].” PL’s Tr. Ex. 8A. Cadle rejected GEICO’s

Liner v. Workers Temporary Staffing, Inc.

990 So. 2d 473, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 583, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1380, 2008 WL 2917512

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2008 | Docket: 2563211

Cited 8 times | Published

Laforet, 658 So.2d 55 (Fla.1995), we held that section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), was penal

Tobin v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.

948 So. 2d 692, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 875, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2946, 2006 WL 3741050

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 1773196

Cited 8 times | Published

insurance policy at issue did not comply with section 627.727 of the Florida *694 Statutes relating to uninsured

St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. Coucher

837 So. 2d 483, 2002 WL 31875017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 405675

Cited 8 times | Published

Such an action was created by a 1992 statute (section 627.727(10)), which greatly expanded the damages recoverable

Rita Strochak v. Federal Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation, Keevily, Spero-Whitelaw, Inc.

109 F.3d 717, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6503, 1997 WL 131336

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 8, 1997 | Docket: 761431

Cited 8 times | Published

uninsured motorist coverage based on Florida Statute § 627.727(2) (1990) 1 in favor of Appellee Federal

Bush Leasing, Inc. v. Gallo

634 So. 2d 737, 1994 WL 91909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1994 | Docket: 1472695

Cited 8 times | Published

Newton, 556 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Section 627.727(6) requires an injured plaintiff who has uninsured

Dauksis v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS.

623 So. 2d 455, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 338, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1024, 1993 WL 209165

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1993 | Docket: 1658407

Cited 8 times | Published

Uninsured motorist coverage is defined in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987), which states in pertinent

Patterson v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

564 So. 2d 1149, 1990 WL 95354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1990 | Docket: 1294263

Cited 8 times | Published

their UM coverage options, as required by Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1987). Because of the

Leaf v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

544 So. 2d 1049, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1277, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2928, 1989 WL 53347

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1989 | Docket: 282534

Cited 8 times | Published

disagree with State Farm's contention that section 627.727(8) governs in the instant case. In our view

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Brewton

538 So. 2d 1375, 1989 WL 16130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1989 | Docket: 1517159

Cited 8 times | Published

issue in this case turns on interpretation of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. McClure

501 So. 2d 141, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1987 | Docket: 538626

Cited 8 times | Published

application of the uninsured motorist statute, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983). Our supreme court

American Fire and Cas. Co. v. Sinz

487 So. 2d 340, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 772

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1986 | Docket: 1796274

Cited 8 times | Published

conduct violated both a policy provision and section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1978), such unauthorized

NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. v. Marchesano

482 So. 2d 422, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 47

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1985 | Docket: 1769879

Cited 8 times | Published

notification sent by the insurer pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1982), in a form approved

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Davella

450 So. 2d 1202, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1984 | Docket: 1433496

Cited 8 times | Published

she was entitled to $100,000 limits pursuant to § 627.727 Fla. Stat. (1980 Supp.). The instant litigation

Sentry Ins. a Mut. Co. v. McGowan

425 So. 2d 98, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22008

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1982 | Docket: 1182232

Cited 8 times | Published

policy was issued, the pertinent statute, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1979), provided that no

First State Ins. Co. v. Stubbs

418 So. 2d 1114, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1982 | Docket: 1686020

Cited 8 times | Published

to its excess liability coverage violated Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1971). That statute required

Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Fulton

362 So. 2d 364, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1978 | Docket: 1362743

Cited 8 times | Published

excess uninsured motorist insurance. Under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), an automobile liability

Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Ilmonen

360 So. 2d 1271, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1978 | Docket: 1738826

Cited 8 times | Published

Jones and Jackson, as allegedly required by Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977) from the TWO HUNDRED

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Castaneda

339 So. 2d 679, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1976 | Docket: 1436662

Cited 8 times | Published

Affirmed in part and reversed in part. NOTES [1] § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1973).

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Farmer

330 So. 2d 236, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1976 | Docket: 1798286

Cited 8 times | Published

legislature amended the foregoing statute (now Florida Statute 627.727) effective October 1, 1973, to provide

Saris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

49 So. 3d 815, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18317, 2010 WL 4861712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2010 | Docket: 2399831

Cited 7 times | Published

policy of the uninsured motorist statute, section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2007). Therefore, we

Peraza v. Robles

983 So. 2d 1189, 2008 WL 942005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2008 | Docket: 347941

Cited 7 times | Published

pay the plaintiff the amount of the settlement. § 627.727(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005).

Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. Baillie Ex Rel. Estate of Stevens

281 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26912, 2002 WL 32165482

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 2361389

Cited 7 times | Published

UM provision required by the Florida statute (§ 627.727(1), Fla. Stat.) for a vehicle principally garaged

Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Evans

668 So. 2d 287, 1996 WL 69113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1996 | Docket: 1869249

Cited 7 times | Published

you sign this form. Please read carefully.' " § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1991) (providing that, if such

Fitzgibbon v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

583 So. 2d 1020, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 472, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1010, 1991 WL 117530

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1991 | Docket: 1464109

Cited 7 times | Published

deceased husband violate the requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1987), to provide uninsured

Travelers Ins. Companies v. Chandler

569 So. 2d 1337, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8595, 1990 WL 175074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1990 | Docket: 1189723

Cited 7 times | Published

underinsured motor vehicle, as defined in Section 627.727(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1985),[1] notwithstanding

Chmieloski v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.

563 So. 2d 164, 1990 WL 77263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1990 | Docket: 1682817

Cited 7 times | Published

lower limits or rejects the coverage altogether. § 627.727(2), Fla. Stat. (1983). At the time this policy

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INS. v. McKinnie

513 So. 2d 748, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2386, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1987 | Docket: 1295335

Cited 7 times | Published

appellate courts in construing the provision of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, to mean that where two

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Becraft

501 So. 2d 1316, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 84

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1527598

Cited 7 times | Published

for public policy reasons. The policy behind section 627.727, Florida Statutes, is to provide the insured

Jackson v. ST. FARM FIRE AND CAS. CO.

469 So. 2d 191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1985 | Docket: 148970

Cited 7 times | Published

rejection thereof by Mr. Jackson, pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1979), the court should

Bergmann v. Sentry Ins.

422 So. 2d 972

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1982 | Docket: 1479695

Cited 7 times | Published

appellant's uninsured motorist claim pursuant to Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977). After being paid

US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Williams

375 So. 2d 328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1979 | Docket: 357915

Cited 7 times | Published

coverage under the terms of the policy or under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977). See generally Kohly

Lezcano v. Leatherby Insurance Co.

372 So. 2d 214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1979 | Docket: 2546414

Cited 7 times | Published

tortfeasor an "underinsured" driver, pursuant to Section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975).[1] The *215

York Ins. Co. v. Becker

364 So. 2d 858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1978 | Docket: 462049

Cited 7 times | Published

and RYDER, J., concur. NOTES [1] Currently § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1977), as amended by Ch. 78-374,

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Reyer

362 So. 2d 390, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17198

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1978 | Docket: 1362979

Cited 7 times | Published

clear expression of legislative intent in Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), prohibits an insurer

American Service Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wilson

323 So. 2d 645, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 1258058

Cited 7 times | Published

under his uninsured motorist coverage, which by § 627.727 would include his medical bills, loss of earnings

PROTECTIVE NATIONAL INS. CO. OMAHA v. McCall

310 So. 2d 324, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1975 | Docket: 1281435

Cited 7 times | Published

or an "insured named" as *326 contemplated by § 627.727, Fla. Stat., which means that the wife could have

Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. v. Tepper

969 So. 2d 403, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16471, 2007 WL 3033402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 1404039

Cited 6 times | Published

requirements set forth in section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (2004). Section 627.727(6)(a)[2] provides that

AUTO-OWNERS INS. v. Above All Roofing, LLC

924 So. 2d 842, 2006 WL 66708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2006 | Docket: 1420024

Cited 6 times | Published

the statutorily required owner's coverage. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2002); Velasquez, 387 So.2d at

Gasch v. Harris

808 So. 2d 1260, 2002 WL 342049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2002 | Docket: 1738477

Cited 6 times | Published

Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So.2d 126 (Fla.2000). Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1999) is controlling

Dominion of Canada v. STATE FARM AND CAS. CO.

754 So. 2d 852, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4174, 2000 WL 353942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2000 | Docket: 431390

Cited 6 times | Published

claims, the Mitchels' counsel, pursuant to section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), asked for

United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Roth

744 So. 2d 1227, 1999 WL 1016296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 26658

Cited 6 times | Published

vehicles because the statutory requirements of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1997), were not met.

Almendral v. Security Nat. Ins. Co.

704 So. 2d 728, 1998 WL 10871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1998 | Docket: 1355119

Cited 6 times | Published

review denied, 476 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1985); see also § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). Toward this end, we have

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Amato

667 So. 2d 802, 1995 WL 540399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 454559

Cited 6 times | Published

We recognize, of course, the provisions of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1993).

Jones v. Integral Ins. Co.

631 So. 2d 1132, 1994 WL 34096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1994 | Docket: 1464487

Cited 6 times | Published

recover damages" from the uninsured motorist. Section 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). "The term `legally entitled

Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Fitzgibbon

568 So. 2d 113, 1990 WL 155483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1990 | Docket: 1526625

Cited 6 times | Published

holdings may violate the public policy of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1987),[2] since liability

Sanchez v. American Ambassador Cas. Co.

559 So. 2d 344, 1990 WL 38702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1990 | Docket: 1516059

Cited 6 times | Published

Sanchez's motion for attorney's fees, citing section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes (1987), and LaChance v

Williams v. FLORIDA INS. GUAR. ASS'N

549 So. 2d 253, 1989 WL 111530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1989 | Docket: 1719656

Cited 6 times | Published

imposed on insurance companies in this state by section 627.727(1) that the insured make a "knowing rejection

Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Smith

527 So. 2d 830, 1988 WL 44333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1988 | Docket: 529954

Cited 6 times | Published

an "uninsured motor vehicle" as defined in section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes, and therefore she was

Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Streicher

506 So. 2d 92, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1143, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1987 | Docket: 1336823

Cited 6 times | Published

the exclusionary language of the policy and section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), which applied to

Stack v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

507 So. 2d 617, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 845, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1987 | Docket: 459952

Cited 6 times | Published

vehicle is "uninsured" within the context of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1985), where the policy

Lewis v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

503 So. 2d 908, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 208, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1987 | Docket: 1453634

Cited 6 times | Published

the terms of the particular policy. Although section 627.727(1) does not establish a mandatory scope of

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Kauffman

495 So. 2d 1184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1986 | Docket: 1758948

Cited 6 times | Published

insured is based upon statute in Florida. Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985), requires that such

Fischer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

495 So. 2d 909, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2165, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1986 | Docket: 1750854

Cited 6 times | Published

omission of any territorial restriction in Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1981), the uninsured motorist

Smith v. American Auto. Ins. Co.

498 So. 2d 448, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1986 | Docket: 1699941

Cited 6 times | Published

appeal, concerning the extent of coverage under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983), since we find

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Eckert

472 So. 2d 807, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1985 | Docket: 1793343

Cited 6 times | Published

demonstrate compliance with its duty under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, to secure an informed

Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Ware

424 So. 2d 907, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1982 | Docket: 1708245

Cited 6 times | Published

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Compare § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1981), with N.J.S.A. § 39:6B-1 and

Kenilworth Ins. Co. v. Drake

396 So. 2d 836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1981 | Docket: 1447971

Cited 6 times | Published

[1] However, the language of the statute (section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), as amended by ch

Florida Ins. Guaranty Ass'n v. Johnson

392 So. 2d 1348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1980 | Docket: 1678374

Cited 6 times | Published

involved: The uninsured motorist statute, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes, which requires uninsured

Lackore v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

390 So. 2d 486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1980 | Docket: 1504264

Cited 6 times | Published

Judge. At issue is whether the provisions of Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977) operate to automatically

Continental Ins. Co. v. Roth

388 So. 2d 617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1980 | Docket: 1520810

Cited 6 times | Published

shall reject the coverage. (Emphasis supplied.) § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1979). (Changes in the law leading

MacKenzie v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.

369 So. 2d 647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1979 | Docket: 470947

Cited 6 times | Published

provisions as are required by ... code"); Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975) (UM coverage required

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Gray

360 So. 2d 16

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1978 | Docket: 1738720

Cited 6 times | Published

pursuant to the "under-insured" provisions of Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975). For purpose of this

Reid v. Allstate Ins. Co.

344 So. 2d 877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1977 | Docket: 474656

Cited 6 times | Published

argument that this exclusion *880 conflicts with Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975). We have considered

Gilbert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

95 F. Supp. 3d 1358, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45494, 2015 WL 1477907

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2015 | Docket: 64301258

Cited 5 times | Published

is had. Fla. Stat. § 627.428(1). However, Section 627.727(8) states that “[t]he provisions of s. 627

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Bowling

81 So. 3d 538, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1947, 2012 WL 413809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2012 | Docket: 333452

Cited 5 times | Published

2006), Mr. Bowling was required to prove under section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2004), that the damages

Rando v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

39 So. 3d 244, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 201, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 475, 2010 WL 1372697

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2010 | Docket: 2527520

Cited 5 times | Published

satisfy the informed consent requirement of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2005).1 Facts and Procedural

Workmen's Auto Insurance Co. v. Franz

24 So. 3d 638, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19073, 2009 WL 4640667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2009 | Docket: 385694

Cited 5 times | Published

regard to the selection of this coverage. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). In count II, Mr. Franz

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish

873 So. 2d 547, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7056, 2004 WL 1123811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2004 | Docket: 1451136

Cited 5 times | Published

in which the form is filled out. Analysis Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1991), requires that all

ALLSTATE INS. CO., INC. v. Campbell

842 So. 2d 1031, 2003 WL 1914781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2003 | Docket: 1730471

Cited 5 times | Published

Bosselman settlement, finding that the language of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1999), precluded the

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Wise

818 So. 2d 524, 2001 WL 574907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2001 | Docket: 1169584

Cited 5 times | Published

See ch. 61-175, Laws of Fla. (now codified at § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (2000)). The shift was even more pronounced

United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Phillips

740 So. 2d 1205, 1999 WL 550790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1999 | Docket: 1456913

Cited 5 times | Published

of such coverage provided under this section. § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1995). There is scant authority

Leszczynski v. Allianz Insurance

176 F.R.D. 659, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 908, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21419, 1997 WL 784584

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1997 | Docket: 66315816

Cited 5 times | Published

comply with the annual notice requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes. Plaintiffs concede that

Galante v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co.

695 So. 2d 456, 1997 WL 291953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 1522071

Cited 5 times | Published

establish the fact of duplicative benefits. See, § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); and Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co

Galante v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co.

695 So. 2d 456, 1997 WL 291953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 1522071

Cited 5 times | Published

establish the fact of duplicative benefits. See, § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); and Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co

Ducharme v. State

690 So. 2d 1358, 1997 WL 148666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1997 | Docket: 436871

Cited 5 times | Published

applying wrong underinsured motorist statute, section 627.727(1), in view of many amendments to statute after

Krawzak v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.

660 So. 2d 306

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1995 | Docket: 1640099

Cited 5 times | Published

carrier, was joined in this lawsuit pursuant to section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991). By motion in limine

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hassen

650 So. 2d 128, 1995 WL 44539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1995 | Docket: 1346814

Cited 5 times | Published

constitutionally erred by applying the provisions of section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), to the Hassens'

Clough v. Govt. Employees Ins. Co.

636 So. 2d 127, 1994 WL 140740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1994 | Docket: 1361299

Cited 5 times | Published

523 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1988). As a result of section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes, adopted effective July

World Wide Underwriters Ins. v. Welker

640 So. 2d 46, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 153, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 462, 1994 WL 102650

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1994 | Docket: 1718885

Cited 5 times | Published

coverage while driving his own truck was invalid. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991), only requires

Omar v. Allstate Ins. Co.

632 So. 2d 214, 1994 WL 46930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1994 | Docket: 462660

Cited 5 times | Published

one contained in these policies pursuant to section 627.727(9)(d), Florida Statutes. This section provides

Budget Rent a Car Systems v. Taylor

626 So. 2d 976, 1993 WL 406624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1993 | Docket: 1285936

Cited 5 times | Published

motor vehicle liability policy; therefore, section 627.727 is not applicable, nor does Budget's status

Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co.

570 So. 2d 291, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 593, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1621, 1990 WL 179074

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1990 | Docket: 405676

Cited 5 times | Published

LIABILITY AND DAMAGES REMAIN AT ISSUE, DOES SECTION 627.727(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985) LIMIT THE FEE AWARDABLE

Newton v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

560 So. 2d 1310, 1990 WL 52802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1990 | Docket: 1739466

Cited 5 times | Published

Uninsured motorist coverage is defined in section 627.727, Florida Statutes, which states in pertinent

St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. v. Smith

504 So. 2d 14, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 405, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1987 | Docket: 453650

Cited 5 times | Published

So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1982). However, in 1980, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1981), was amended to provide

Bankers Ins. Co. v. Vasquez

483 So. 2d 440, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 96

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 455674

Cited 5 times | Published

answer. As the court in Kimbrell remarked, Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), embodies a public

Johnson v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.

472 So. 2d 859, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1741, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1985 | Docket: 2517766

Cited 5 times | Published

named insured rejects the coverage in writing. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). Thus, the required UM benefits

Lane v. Waste Management, Inc.

432 So. 2d 70

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1983 | Docket: 1264020

Cited 5 times | Published

Management, was not familiar with the provisions of Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977), any purported rejection

GEN. ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORP., LTD. v. MacKenzie

410 So. 2d 558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1982 | Docket: 477685

Cited 5 times | Published

rely upon the renewal exception contained in Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, to obviate the necessity

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wright

406 So. 2d 1261, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1981 | Docket: 449871

Cited 5 times | Published

Thompson Barbara H. Thompson Comptroller Section 627.727(1) Florida Statutes (1975), requires an insurance

United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Curry

395 So. 2d 530, 28 A.L.R. 4th 358

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1981 | Docket: 2529028

Cited 5 times | Published

this coverage as an underinsured pursuant to section 627.727. U.S.F. & G. filed for a declaratory judgment

Waters v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

393 So. 2d 1203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1981 | Docket: 1372364

Cited 5 times | Published

chief, but reverse the fee. 1. UMC Setoff. Section 627.727(1) (1975) provides that UMC benefits "shall

Kobetitsch v. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.

390 So. 2d 76

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1980 | Docket: 1504170

Cited 5 times | Published

Automobile Ins. Co., 252 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1971); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1977) (Precluding issuance of

Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Lang

387 So. 2d 976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1980 | Docket: 1706357

Cited 5 times | Published

available to the insured from the tortfeasor. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat.; Dickey v. Grange Mutual Casualty

Lancaster Oil Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

486 F. Supp. 399, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12054

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1980 | Docket: 1348816

Cited 5 times | Published

per accident. Lancaster Oil is relying upon Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977)[2], which prohibits

Glover v. Aetna Ins. Co.

363 So. 2d 12, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1978 | Docket: 461022

Cited 5 times | Published

carrier of his employer. He contends that under Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1971), an insurance carrier

Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Goldman

346 So. 2d 111, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1977 | Docket: 1410029

Cited 5 times | Published

uninsured or hit-and-run vehicle, as defined under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), or in the policy

Garcia v. Allstate Insurance Company

327 So. 2d 784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1976 | Docket: 1364165

Cited 5 times | Published

insurance policy is in full compliance with F.S. 627.727 as amended by Chapter 71-88, Laws of Florida;

Diaz-Hernandez v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

19 So. 3d 996, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6233, 2009 WL 1456756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 60254744

Cited 4 times | Published

against the public policy of the UM statute, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2007), and therefore, void

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO. v. Shaw

967 So. 2d 1011, 2007 WL 3166942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2007 | Docket: 1454102

Cited 4 times | Published

limits of $50,000 per person, pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2004), we reverse the

Progressive Exp. Ins. Co. v. Scoma

975 So. 2d 461, 2007 WL 1296007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2007 | Docket: 1425596

Cited 4 times | Published

motorist coverage provided to comply with section 627.727, are coverage for the direct benefit of the

USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Shelton

932 So. 2d 605, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10785, 2006 WL 1791708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1684870

Cited 4 times | Published

tortfeasor with insufficient or no insurance. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). Therefore, in a UM claim

Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores

905 So. 2d 179, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8508, 2005 WL 662631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2005 | Docket: 1711712

Cited 4 times | Published

modified by the uninsured motorist statute. See id. § 627.727(8). We conclude that Sarkis has not overruled

Richard C. Gares v. Allstate Insurance Company

365 F.3d 990, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6963, 2004 WL 758970

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 9, 2004 | Docket: 213013

Cited 4 times | Published

vehicle is insured [for purposes of Fla. Stat. § 627.727(a)] only when the insurance in question is available

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hild

818 So. 2d 714, 2002 WL 1343551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2002 | Docket: 1169553

Cited 4 times | Published

decision conflicts with the plain language of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1997), we reverse. The

National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Blackmon

754 So. 2d 840, 2000 WL 354199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2000 | Docket: 1523478

Cited 4 times | Published

the remaining approximately $73,000 under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Christopher

749 So. 2d 581, 2000 WL 85197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2000 | Docket: 1690301

Cited 4 times | Published

REMANDED. DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 627.727(9)(d), Fla. Stat. See Mangual v. State Farm Mutual

Bell v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.

744 So. 2d 1165, 1999 WL 982952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1999 | Docket: 1721338

Cited 4 times | Published

is one that is created entirely by statute. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes requires an insurance

Gray v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

734 So. 2d 1102, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640, 1999 WL 270187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 1442375

Cited 4 times | Published

settlement as required by the insurance policy and section 627.727(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). The motion

Zeichner v. City of Lauderhill

732 So. 2d 1109, 1999 WL 71632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 1513345

Cited 4 times | Published

the total damages sustained. [Florida Statute § 627.727(3)(b)(1995) of the Insurance *1112 Code] A self-insured

Tres v. Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

705 So. 2d 643, 1998 WL 17378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1998 | Docket: 1580294

Cited 4 times | Published

million-dollar liability limit as required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1993). The reason advanced

Massa v. Southern Heritage Ins. Co.

697 So. 2d 868, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6153, 1997 WL 291702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 1776758

Cited 4 times | Published

that it does not. First, there is nothing in section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), which requires

Martin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

670 So. 2d 997, 1996 WL 46591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 1671421

Cited 4 times | Published

this policy. We hold that the requirements of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and the legislative

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Stafstrom

668 So. 2d 631, 1996 WL 18443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1996 | Docket: 1687010

Cited 4 times | Published

decisions, including Sentry, interpreting section 627.727 as imposing no such requirement. Rather, the

Amarnick v. AUTO. INS. OF HARTFORD, CONN.

643 So. 2d 1130, 1994 WL 511079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1994 | Docket: 1493152

Cited 4 times | Published

applicable provisions of this code." In addition, section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1993), provides, in part

Govt. Employees Ins. Co. v. Douglas

627 So. 2d 102, 1993 WL 482322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1993 | Docket: 1752947

Cited 4 times | Published

the accident occurred after the adoption of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1987), in which the Florida

Hartford Ins. Co. v. Atkinson

623 So. 2d 549, 1993 WL 292070

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1993 | Docket: 1184058

Cited 4 times | Published

with the annual notification provisions of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991). This form *550

Volk v. Gallopo

585 So. 2d 1163, 1991 WL 181705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1991 | Docket: 1293778

Cited 4 times | Published

benefit from uninsured motorist coverage. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), provides

Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bourke

581 So. 2d 1365, 1991 WL 95637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1991 | Docket: 1683992

Cited 4 times | Published

is an "uninsured motor vehicle" pursuant to section 627.727(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). Michigan Millers

Woodard v. Pa. Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.

534 So. 2d 716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1988 | Docket: 1707712

Cited 4 times | Published

amendment to the uninsured motorist statute, § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1984), make uninsured motorist

Marquez v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.

534 So. 2d 918, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2694, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5419, 1988 WL 131690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1988 | Docket: 51590

Cited 4 times | Published

1988), deciding that the 1984 amendments to section 627.727, Florida Statutes, did not change the definition

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Morales

533 So. 2d 952, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2568, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5162, 1988 WL 123688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1988 | Docket: 1656481

Cited 4 times | Published

presented on this appeal is whether under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983)[1], an underinsured

Centennial Ins. Co. v. Fulton

532 So. 2d 1329, 1988 WL 114733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1988 | Docket: 1510193

Cited 4 times | Published

duplicating workers' compensation payments under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977). That statute provides:

United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Strasser

530 So. 2d 1026, 1988 WL 89161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1988 | Docket: 1267733

Cited 4 times | Published

motorist coverage. The applicable statute is section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982), which provides:

Landi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

529 So. 2d 1170, 1988 WL 69354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1988 | Docket: 432278

Cited 4 times | Published

Plaintiffs also argue that the amendment to section 627.727(1), which was effective October 1, 1987, should

Gast v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

516 So. 2d 112, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2793, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471, 1987 WL 2328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1987 | Docket: 1267126

Cited 4 times | Published

properly rejected in writing as required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court

Auger v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

516 So. 2d 1024, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2775, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11301, 1987 WL 2126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1987 | Docket: 1266165

Cited 4 times | Published

enactment, the uninsured motorist statute (now section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985)) has been amended

Webster v. Valiant Ins. Co.

512 So. 2d 971, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1833

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1987 | Docket: 1517429

Cited 4 times | Published

uninsured motorist protection as broad as section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1984) requires. Any attempt

NORTHERN INS. CO., NEW YORK v. Hiers

504 So. 2d 1382, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1987 | Docket: 1511173

Cited 4 times | Published

statutory notification procedure contained in section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983).[1] Hiers testified

Nicholas v. NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INS.

503 So. 2d 993, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1987 | Docket: 376520

Cited 4 times | Published

to the uninsured motorist coverage statute, section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1984 Supp.), uninsured

Baum v. Allstate Ins. Co.

496 So. 2d 201, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 428164

Cited 4 times | Published

defined by Florida Statutes and case law. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that

Compass Ins. Co. v. Woodard

489 So. 2d 1157, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1986 | Docket: 546061

Cited 4 times | Published

rejection of such coverage did not comply with section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983), and that therefore

Smith v. ST. FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

479 So. 2d 160, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1985 | Docket: 463613

Cited 4 times | Published

was not an uninsured motorist as defined in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983). We disagree. The

Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. McKinnie

460 So. 2d 389, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2342, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1984 | Docket: 1766339

Cited 4 times | Published

Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent

Sirantoine v. ILL. EMPLOYERS INS.

438 So. 2d 985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1983 | Docket: 2318486

Cited 4 times | Published

1982), review denied, 426 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1983); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). Reversed and remanded with

Realin v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

418 So. 2d 431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1982 | Docket: 1289147

Cited 4 times | Published

afforded by the policy issued, as is required by Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court

Spaulding v. AMERICAN FIRE & INDEM CO

412 So. 2d 367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1981 | Docket: 1525832

Cited 4 times | Published

court concluded the lower amount was correct. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977) required uninsured

Lobry v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

398 So. 2d 877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1981 | Docket: 1696575

Cited 4 times | Published

operator for the accident. (Emphasis supplied). § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1978). We have taken the

Bruno v. Travelers Ins. Co.

386 So. 2d 251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1980 | Docket: 476987

Cited 4 times | Published

confirmation, and Bruno appeals. We affirm. Section 627.727(1) Florida Statutes (1977) expressly states

Hall v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

376 So. 2d 1183, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1979 | Docket: 1410777

Cited 4 times | Published

automobile medical expense coverages... ." Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977). Hall's reply brief

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Almgreen

376 So. 2d 1184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1979 | Docket: 1411338

Cited 4 times | Published

coverage contains no definition of motor vehicle. Section 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1977). Since we find that appellant's

Behrmann v. INDUSTRIAL FIRE & CAS. INS.

374 So. 2d 568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1979 | Docket: 430838

Cited 4 times | Published

v. Ilmonen, 360 So.2d 1271 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1977). This result is not changed

Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Goldman

374 So. 2d 539, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1979 | Docket: 430842

Cited 4 times | Published

maintenance of an uninsured vehicle as defined by Section 627.727, *542 Florida Statutes (1977), or as defined

Yaden v. Hanover Ins. Co.

375 So. 2d 5

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1979 | Docket: 1352816

Cited 4 times | Published

Vorobok's policy we must look to the statute. Section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1973), provides in

Dickey v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

370 So. 2d 1234, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1979 | Docket: 1386570

Cited 4 times | Published

Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 363 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 1978); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1977): The coverage provided under

Masters v. Lester

366 So. 2d 471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1979 | Docket: 1228119

Cited 4 times | Published

policy. This is in accord with Florida Statute § 627.727(1), as most recently interpreted by the Supreme

Mattingly v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

363 So. 2d 147, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1978 | Docket: 461202

Cited 4 times | Published

provisions of the uninsured motorist statute, Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975). The appellant

Barlow v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE CO.

358 So. 2d 1128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1978 | Docket: 1311569

Cited 4 times | Published

under the Uninsured Motor Vehicle Coverage. Section 627.727 Florida Statutes. The insurance policy says:

Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Moreno

350 So. 2d 38, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1977 | Docket: 242263

Cited 4 times | Published

1975), cert. den. 316 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1975); Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975). See American Service

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Furman

341 So. 2d 1056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1977 | Docket: 1723997

Cited 4 times | Published

uninsured motorist coverage in the light of Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1973), which appellant claims

US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Darden

338 So. 2d 37

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1976 | Docket: 1511779

Cited 4 times | Published

1974, 302 So.2d 141, that because Fla. Stat. § 627.727 requires uninsured motorist coverage unless affirmatively

Allstate Insurance Company v. Baer

334 So. 2d 135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1976 | Docket: 1712432

Cited 4 times | Published

not affected by the above amendment. [2] Section 627.727(1) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. (in the form in which

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Wheelus

319 So. 2d 181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1975 | Docket: 444019

Cited 4 times | Published

Chapter 71-355, is now in the Florida Statutes as § 627.727(4). Although it appears that § 627.0851(4), F

Summers v. Jackson

307 So. 2d 235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1975 | Docket: 1699753

Cited 4 times | Published

renewed after January 1, 1972, at which time § 627.727(1), F.S. 1971, was effective. Said section provides

Boulnois v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO

286 So. 2d 264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1973 | Docket: 1408065

Cited 4 times | Published

Section 627.0851(1), Florida Statutes 1970, now Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes 1971, F.S.A. The statute

Mitleider v. Brier Grieves Agency, Inc.

53 So. 3d 410, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1903, 2011 WL 520103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2011 | Docket: 60298107

Cited 3 times | Published

motorist coverage. We find that it does, since section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2007), creates a conclusive

Wolf v. Progressive American Insurance Co.

34 So. 3d 81, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4185, 2010 WL 1379590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2010 | Docket: 1128940

Cited 3 times | Published

by an uninsured driver. At issue is whether section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2006), required Progressive

O'BRIEN v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

999 So. 2d 1081, 2009 WL 36475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2009 | Docket: 1514831

Cited 3 times | Published

concluded that State Farm had complied with section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes. We affirm. I. We review

Muth v. AIU Ins. Co.

982 So. 2d 749, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 2008 WL 2261552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2008 | Docket: 1207283

Cited 3 times | Published

AIU and obtaining AIU's consent, contrary to section 627.727(6)(a), Florida Statutes. Further, appellant's

MERCURY INS. CO. OF FLORIDA v. Anatkov

929 So. 2d 624, 2006 WL 1331501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 1422633

Cited 3 times | Published

premium, precludes judgment in Anatkov's favor, see § 627.727(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003) (requiring an injured

Roach v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

892 So. 2d 1107, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17036, 2004 WL 2532959

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2004 | Docket: 471874

Cited 3 times | Published

coverage, including liability insurance. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2000); Salas v. Liberty Mut. Fire

Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Hayward

858 So. 2d 1238, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17436, 2003 WL 22682060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 460728

Cited 3 times | Published

this state is defined under Florida Statutes, Section 627.727(1) which provides: No motor vehicle liability

Ferreiro v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.

816 So. 2d 140, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4269, 2002 WL 491791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2002 | Docket: 1753341

Cited 3 times | Published

000 limits of liability insurance. Although section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1997) specifically provides

McGann v. Florida Elections Com'n

803 So. 2d 763, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15629, 2001 WL 1355313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2001 | Docket: 1784840

Cited 3 times | Published

658 So.2d 55, 61 (Fla.1995) (finding that section 627.727(10) could not be applied retroactively because

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Vecchio

744 So. 2d 570, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14779, 1999 WL 1015527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 1381028

Cited 3 times | Published

establishing a duplication of benefits, see section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991); Galante, 695 So

Perry v. Munger

730 So. 2d 393, 1999 WL 194177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1999 | Docket: 1645756

Cited 3 times | Published

accident in 1989. Thus, the 1989 version of section 627.727, Florida Statutes, which governs underinsured

Belmont v. Allstate Ins. Co.

721 So. 2d 436, 1998 WL 833509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1998 | Docket: 1323139

Cited 3 times | Published

conditions of the policy and Florida Statute, § 627.727(9) the coverage is limited to $30,000." The Belmonts

Mangual v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

719 So. 2d 981, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13543, 1998 WL 736423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1998 | Docket: 1705122

Cited 3 times | Published

in accordance with Florida Statute § 627.727(9)." Section 627.727(9) provides that if adequate notice

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rudnick

706 So. 2d 389, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1385, 1998 WL 63836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 1682440

Cited 3 times | Published

736(3), and 768.76(1), Florida Statutes (1993). Section 627.727(1), provides that uninsured and underinsured

Mosca v. Globe Indem.

693 So. 2d 674, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4922, 1997 WL 228627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1997 | Docket: 1524488

Cited 3 times | Published

the scope of UM coverage in derogation of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant was

Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Van Gessel

665 So. 2d 263, 1995 WL 675031

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1351343

Cited 3 times | Published

policy. In response, the legislature added section 627.727(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1992 Supp.), to rectify

Warren v. Travelers Ins. Co.

650 So. 2d 1082, 1995 WL 66949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1995 | Docket: 1703185

Cited 3 times | Published

WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 627.727(3)(b), Florida Statues (1989), provides a similar

Foremost Ins. Co. v. Warmuth

649 So. 2d 939, 1995 WL 59306

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1995 | Docket: 1320826

Cited 3 times | Published

Co., 529 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1988). As such, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1993), allows the insured

Colford v. Braun Cadillac, Inc.

620 So. 2d 780, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4215, 1993 WL 114657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1993 | Docket: 415024

Cited 3 times | Published

tortfeasors in a civil action pursuant to section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991), may be prevented

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dauksis

596 So. 2d 1169, 1992 WL 63112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1992 | Docket: 1296092

Cited 3 times | Published

regular PIP claims because of the policy behind section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), which is

National American Ins. Co. v. BAXLEY EX REL. BAXLEY

578 So. 2d 441, 1991 WL 60027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1991 | Docket: 440800

Cited 3 times | Published

procured such a rejection from Baxley. However, section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that

National American Ins. Co. v. BAXLEY EX REL. BAXLEY

578 So. 2d 441, 1991 WL 60027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1991 | Docket: 440800

Cited 3 times | Published

procured such a rejection from Baxley. However, section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that

Lampkin v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

581 So. 2d 175, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4250, 1990 WL 78525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1990 | Docket: 1683861

Cited 3 times | Published

would be inconsistent with the terms *176 of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985), the version in force

Morrison v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.

543 So. 2d 425, 1989 WL 51221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1989 | Docket: 1729897

Cited 3 times | Published

favor of Universal. Morrison contends that Florida Statute 627.727, as amended in 1984, allows him to claim

Watherwax v. Allstate Ins. Co.

538 So. 2d 108, 1989 WL 9754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1989 | Docket: 1517166

Cited 3 times | Published

the tortfeasor as required by the policy and section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1985). The appellant

Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Russell

527 So. 2d 228, 1988 WL 47501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1988 | Docket: 529100

Cited 3 times | Published

liability insurance as uninsured motorist coverage. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1983); First State Insurance Company

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS v. Clauson

511 So. 2d 1085, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2115, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1987 | Docket: 1338572

Cited 3 times | Published

coverage under its policy[2] and the applicable law. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1983); Allstate Insurance Co.

Pierce v. AALL INS. INC.

513 So. 2d 160, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1987 | Docket: 1295082

Cited 3 times | Published

(Ch. 475); and numerous other occupations. [4] § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1981).

St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. MacDonald

509 So. 2d 1139, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1987 | Docket: 1715451

Cited 3 times | Published

UM coverage. The policy was in force when section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1973), was amended, effective

AUTO. INS. CO. OF HARTFORD v. Beem

469 So. 2d 138, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 98, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1985 | Docket: 1679650

Cited 3 times | Published

applicable at the time of this accident was section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1981). It reads, in pertinent

New Hampshire Ins. Group v. Harbach

439 So. 2d 1383, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2693

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1983 | Docket: 1265701

Cited 3 times | Published

uninsured motorist protection as defined by section 627.727 and interpreted by our decision in Mullis was

Craft v. Govt. Employees Ins. Co.

432 So. 2d 1343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1983 | Docket: 1264016

Cited 3 times | Published

the public policy of Florida as expressed in Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975), which provides

GENERAL INS. CO OF FLORIDA v. Sutton

396 So. 2d 855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1981 | Docket: 295494

Cited 3 times | Published

Co., 378 So.2d 104 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), under section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1971) uninsured motorist

Porter v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

385 So. 2d 1100

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1980 | Docket: 1337587

Cited 3 times | Published

merit since the Porters correctly relied upon Section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1977),[1] which calls

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Napoli

380 So. 2d 1325, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1980 | Docket: 1402990

Cited 3 times | Published

1077 (Fla. 1978), specifically holds that Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975), intended that

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Searle

379 So. 2d 131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1979 | Docket: 1277445

Cited 3 times | Published

tortfeasor an "uninsured" motorist pursuant to Section 627.727(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). In so holding

Home Ins. Co. v. Mendelson

367 So. 2d 1071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1979 | Docket: 1329397

Cited 3 times | Published

Pursuant to this finding, the court held that Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), was applicable and

AMERICAN FIRE AND CAS. CO. v. Boyd

357 So. 2d 768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1978 | Docket: 2517965

Cited 3 times | Published

vehicle" within the meaning of that term as used in F.S. 627.727. We hold that it was, and therefore affirm.

Jones v. TRAVELERS INDEM. CO. OF RHODE ISLAND

357 So. 2d 231, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1978 | Docket: 1511246

Cited 3 times | Published

her uninsured motorist policy, in spite of Section 627.727 of the Florida Statutes. The Appellant and

Castaneda v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

348 So. 2d 1231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1977 | Docket: 1760370

Cited 3 times | Published

"underinsured" motor vehicles arose out of Section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1973), which was not

Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Company v. Jones

317 So. 2d 786, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1975 | Docket: 1692332

Cited 3 times | Published

contention is without merit. The applicable statute, § 627.727, Fla. Stat., specifically provides that an insured

Lange v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

300 So. 2d 68, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1974 | Docket: 1434735

Cited 3 times | Published

extent of coverage permitted by Florida Statutes § 627.727 and as to his rights under an insurance certificate

Gianassi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

60 F. Supp. 3d 1267, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142600

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2014 | Docket: 64298461

Cited 2 times | Published

damages in excess of the policy limits. Fla. Stat. § 627.727(10). Under Florida law, a final determination

Geico General Insurance Company v. Kelly Paton

150 So. 3d 804, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14362, 2014 WL 4626860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2014 | Docket: 1255916

Cited 2 times | Published

limits. In 1992, the Legislature passed section 627.727(10), which provides: The damages recoverable

GEICO Casualty Co. v. Barber

147 So. 3d 109, 2014 WL 3966053, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2014 | Docket: 60243074

Cited 2 times | Published

say bad-faith actions should be conducted. Section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (2008), specifically

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Robin Curran

135 So. 3d 1071, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 980, 2014 WL 1010658

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2014 | Docket: 402399

Cited 2 times | Published

question of prejudice. ANALYSIS Pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2007), insurers issuing

Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Rader

132 So. 3d 941, 2014 WL 660204, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2014 | Docket: 60238594

Cited 2 times | Published

a separate suit on damages as contemplated by § 627.727(10), Florida Statutes.” Safeco also cited Government

Neff v. Property & Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford

133 So. 3d 530, 2013 WL 6152329, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2013 | Docket: 60238796

Cited 2 times | Published

Ins. Co., 290 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974))). Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2009), describes UM coverage

Essex Insurance Co. v. Integrated Drainage Solutions, Inc.

124 So. 3d 947, 2013 WL 5495541, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60235583

Cited 2 times | Published

“the Legislature has expressly stated that section 627,727(10) is remedial and is to be applied retroactively”)

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Siergiej

116 So. 3d 523, 2013 WL 2661844, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2013 | Docket: 60232380

Cited 2 times | Published

judgment to an amount less than $100,000. See § 627.727(6)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). We conclude, however

Swan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

60 So. 3d 514, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 2011 WL 1563934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2011 | Docket: 60300257

Cited 2 times | Published

coverage in the Honda policy as required by section 627.727 of the Florida Statutes; as required they paid

Geico General Insurance Co. v. Cirillo-Meijer

50 So. 3d 681, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18630, 2010 WL 4962815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2010 | Docket: 2399476

Cited 2 times | Published

verdict on the permanency threshold. Set-Off Section 627.727, Florida Statutes, authorizes an injured party

Rando v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

556 F.3d 1173, 2009 WL 225251

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 15, 2010 | Docket: 1350452

Cited 2 times | Published

satisfy the informed consent requirement of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2005)." Rando v. Gov't

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hartzog

917 So. 2d 363, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20371, 2005 WL 3555702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2005 | Docket: 1509646

Cited 2 times | Published

insured person, not the insured vehicle. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. Therefore, we reverse and remand

Yzaguirre v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INS. COMPANY, INC.

793 So. 2d 99, 2001 WL 930042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 1266274

Cited 2 times | Published

Therefore, we reverse the final summary judgment. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1999), which concerns

Hooper v. Zurich Insurance

789 So. 2d 368, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3389, 2001 WL 379153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2001 | Docket: 64806666

Cited 2 times | Published

to UM benefits under section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1995). Section 627.727(1), in pertinent part

Dalola v. Barber

757 So. 2d 1215, 2000 WL 263177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2000 | Docket: 706250

Cited 2 times | Published

alleging that it had failed to comply with section 627.727(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). This statute

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Ledford

729 So. 2d 426, 1999 WL 76399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1999 | Docket: 1653178

Cited 2 times | Published

statutory presumption as a matter of law. Under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991), the amount of

Young v. GANASE DHARAMDASS

695 So. 2d 828, 1997 WL 311563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1997 | Docket: 1521982

Cited 2 times | Published

Appellant failed to meet the requirements of section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991), for joining an

Johnson v. Stanley White Ins.

684 So. 2d 248, 1996 WL 691402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1996 | Docket: 1740845

Cited 2 times | Published

to them stands unrefuted at this time. *250 Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1993), purports to make

Orion Ins. Co. v. Cox

681 So. 2d 760, 1996 WL 511553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1996 | Docket: 1385491

Cited 2 times | Published

the policy issued to Ms. Cox, as required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991). On January 3,

Brush v. Palm Beach County

679 So. 2d 814, 1996 WL 441636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1996 | Docket: 1665855

Cited 2 times | Published

this appeal is the dilemma of reconciling section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991), which provides

Travelers v. Boyles

679 So. 2d 1188, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6892, 1996 WL 366407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1996 | Docket: 1665966

Cited 2 times | Published

on the following emphasized provisions in section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1993), our UM statute:

Allianz Ins. Co. v. Halpenny

678 So. 2d 368

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1996 | Docket: 1736987

Cited 2 times | Published

comply with the annual notice requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991),[1] we find that

Hartford Ins. Co. v. Minagorri

675 So. 2d 142, 1996 WL 210749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1996 | Docket: 1322807

Cited 2 times | Published

tortfeasor is considered an "uninsured motorist." See § 627.727(3), Fla.Stat. (1995). Because the tortfeasor's

Valiant Insurance v. Evonosky

864 F. Supp. 1189, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14260, 1994 WL 544346

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1994 | Docket: 1021666

Cited 2 times | Published

inapplicable pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 627.727(9). A. Liability Under Florida law, courts

ST. FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Laforet

632 So. 2d 608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 462700

Cited 2 times | Published

post-trial motion for additur, based upon amended section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), which states:

DeLuna v. Valiant Insurance

792 F. Supp. 790, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8209, 1992 WL 130862

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1992 | Docket: 1496731

Cited 2 times | Published

B. Statutory Construction Florida Statutes Section 627.727(9) (1989) requires that notice be given to

Muhammed v. Allstate Insurance Co.

582 So. 2d 768, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7259, 1991 WL 128310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1991 | Docket: 2558852

Cited 2 times | Published

departs from the one statutorily provided by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984) does not preclude

Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Morrison

574 So. 2d 1063, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 552, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1488, 1990 WL 159362

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1990 | Docket: 1436949

Cited 2 times | Published

on the premise that the 1984 amendment to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), permitted Morrison

METRO. PROPERTY & LIABILITY INS. CO. v. Clinton

553 So. 2d 1287, 1989 WL 146031

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1989 | Docket: 1675752

Cited 2 times | Published

an "uninsured motor vehicle" as defined by Section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes (1987).[1] *1288 First

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Polgar

551 So. 2d 549, 1989 WL 109980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1989 | Docket: 527701

Cited 2 times | Published

America, 508 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983).[1] Since appellee

Park v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.

547 So. 2d 213, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1606, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3842, 1989 WL 73835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1989 | Docket: 64644158

Cited 2 times | Published

than “excess,” the trial court relied upon section 627.-727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), which was

Sapienza v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford

543 So. 2d 845, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1212, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2649, 1989 WL 50222

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1989 | Docket: 1211935

Cited 2 times | Published

not fall within the statutory mandates of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987), providing for uninsured

HARTFORD INS. CO. MIDWEST v. Surrency

537 So. 2d 208, 1989 WL 4302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1989 | Docket: 426960

Cited 2 times | Published

policy issued to appellees. Chapter 84-41, section 627.727, Florida Statutes requires an insurance policy

Lachance v. Sagumeri

537 So. 2d 665, 1989 WL 2037

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1989 | Docket: 1522559

Cited 2 times | Published

We hold that such an award is prohibited by section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes (1987), and accordingly

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. CO. v. Johnson

536 So. 2d 1089, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2500, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5021, 1988 WL 120929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1988 | Docket: 1760018

Cited 2 times | Published

court reasoned: The legislative purpose behind section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985), is to provide coverage

White v. Allstate Ins. Co.

530 So. 2d 967, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3508, 1988 WL 81575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1988 | Docket: 1268586

Cited 2 times | Published

of Allstate Insurance Company. We affirm. Section 627.727 requires that all automobile insurance policies

Bolin v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co.

518 So. 2d 393, 1987 WL 29030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1988 | Docket: 1778586

Cited 2 times | Published

Company, 494 So.2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985). Massachusetts Bay

Progressive American Ins. Co. v. Kurtz

518 So. 2d 1339, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11742, 1987 WL 3172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 1778576

Cited 2 times | Published

means to request such coverage as required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983). The ultimate issue

Riggsby v. West American Ins. Co.

505 So. 2d 1364, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1987 | Docket: 304167

Cited 2 times | Published

bodily injury liability coverage. We agree. Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983) provides in pertinent

Sallade v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California

465 So. 2d 1307, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 672, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1985 | Docket: 1323777

Cited 2 times | Published

hold that the "uninsured motorist statute", Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), does not apply to

Coney v. General Ins. Co.

445 So. 2d 671, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1984 | Docket: 1685472

Cited 2 times | Published

concluding as a matter of law that: The provisions of F.S. 627.727(1) apply to automobile liability insurance and

Kobert v. Zarem

437 So. 2d 730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1983 | Docket: 1256808

Cited 2 times | Published

again (2) at the time of annual renewal thereof. § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1981). Such coverage need not be

Petrou v. South Carolina Ins. Co.

435 So. 2d 316, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1983 | Docket: 1328425

Cited 2 times | Published

rejection or selection of UMI coverage. Under Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), if an insured

Progressive American Ins. Co. v. Glenn

428 So. 2d 367, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1983 | Docket: 1720064

Cited 2 times | Published

constitutes an impermissible exclusion under Section 627.727 Florida Statutes (1979). See Mullis v. State

Ferrigno v. Progressive American Ins. Co.

426 So. 2d 1218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1983 | Docket: 1283246

Cited 2 times | Published

insureds. In 1980 the Legislature amended section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), by requiring

Florida Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Quinones

409 So. 2d 97, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1982 | Docket: 237884

Cited 2 times | Published

against the uninsured motorist tortfeasor; (2) Section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1977), makes such an

Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Sutton

400 So. 2d 476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1981 | Docket: 1263562

Cited 2 times | Published

by GEICO against Sutton. GEICO was required by § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1971) to provide Sutton with insurance

Holt v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

385 So. 2d 1058, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1980 | Docket: 1700452

Cited 2 times | Published

holding was based upon an interpretation of Section 627.727(1) Florida Statutes (1977), which provides

Great American Ins. Co. v. Pappas

345 So. 2d 823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1977 | Docket: 1478180

Cited 2 times | Published

provided under his uninsured motorist's coverage. Section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1975). See also Arrieta

Johnson v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

333 So. 2d 542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1976 | Docket: 1291001

Cited 2 times | Published

provision to that effect in the Geico policy, and by § 627.727(3), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. In the trial court Johnson

American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Dawson

320 So. 2d 38

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1975 | Docket: 1733788

Cited 2 times | Published

as to it and determining that the phrase from § 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 71-88

Wiener v. Avis Rent a Car

318 So. 2d 565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1975 | Docket: 1504522

Cited 2 times | Published

writing. This allegation is of no import because § 627.727, F.S. 1973, requiring the inclusion of uninsured

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Perez

260 So. 3d 342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2018 | Docket: 64699740

Cited 1 times | Published

his motorcycle, and, alternately (ii) under section 627.727(1) of the Florida statutes (2013), GEICO was

Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Willis

235 So. 3d 1041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2018 | Docket: 60286100

Cited 1 times | Published

the policy of the UM statute as set forth in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2014). Both parties eventually

Schoeck v. Allstate Insuance Company

235 So. 3d 953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2017 | Docket: 6169398

Cited 1 times | Published

to any vehicle insured under that policy. See § 627.727(9)(c), Fla, Stat. (2015). Allstate argued that

Mary Bottini v. GEICO

859 F.3d 987, 2017 WL 2589986, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 2017 | Docket: 6075023

Cited 1 times | Published

fire was underinsured for purposes of Fla. Stat. § 627.727. After Mr. Bottini’s death, Mary Bottini, his

Batchelor v. Geico Casualty Co.

142 F. Supp. 3d 1220, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144891

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2015 | Docket: 64305139

Cited 1 times | Published

October 22,2015. . Pursuant to Florida Statutes, § 627.727(1), Geico was required to offer uninsured motorist

Gwendolyn Echo v. MGA Insurance Company, Inc.

157 So. 3d 507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2015 | Docket: 2634483

Cited 1 times | Published

tortfeasor with insufficient or no insurance. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). Therefore, in a UM claim

Tara Woods SPE, LLC v. Cashin

116 So. 3d 492, 2013 WL 2278011, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2013 | Docket: 60232364

Cited 1 times | Published

supports this reading of section 723.059. Cf. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2011) (requiring insurance policies

Tara Woods SPE, LLC v. Cashin

116 So. 3d 492, 2013 WL 2278011, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2013 | Docket: 60232364

Cited 1 times | Published

supports this reading of section 723.059. Cf. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2011) (requiring insurance policies

Geico General Insurance Co. v. Bottini

93 So. 3d 476, 2012 WL 2946533, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2012 | Docket: 60310611

Cited 1 times | Published

that action are specified by the legislature. Section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (2006), states: The damages

Travelers Commercial Insurance v. Harrington

86 So. 3d 1274, 2012 WL 1623512, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2012 | Docket: 60307625

Cited 1 times | Published

with the requirements for such coverage under section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes, and is therefore invalid

Bedoya v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America

773 F. Supp. 2d 1326, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37119, 2011 WL 1138645

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2011 | Docket: 2338770

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida, applied Florida law to interpret section 627.727, Florida Statutes, and determine whether UM

Franklin v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

44 So. 3d 1281, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15062, 2010 WL 3909875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2010 | Docket: 2570406

Cited 1 times | Published

2010) ("We do not read the plain language of section 627.727(1) to require that notice of UM coverage availability

Progressive American Insurance Co. v. Gregory, Inc.

16 So. 3d 979, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 2009 WL 2601646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1641289

Cited 1 times | Published

entitled to judgment as a matter of law). Section 627.727 of the Florida Statutes expressly provides

Pawtucket Mutual Insurance Co. v. Manganelli

3 So. 3d 421, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1274, 2009 WL 383592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2009 | Docket: 60289172

Cited 1 times | Published

in order to proceed with the arbitration. Section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes, was intended to preclude

Sterling v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.

936 So. 2d 43, 2006 WL 2033880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2006 | Docket: 1651098

Cited 1 times | Published

Sterlings' son as a "Class I" insured. We disagree. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2002), states, in relevant

Tobin v. Michigan Mutual Insurance

398 F.3d 1267, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1736, 2005 WL 248168

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 3, 2005 | Docket: 65656729

Cited 1 times | Published

based on Florida statute § 627.727. The plaintiffs contended (1) that § 627.727 requires that all insureds

Mark Andrew Tobin v. Michigan Mutual

476 F.3d 1191

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 3, 2005 | Docket: 398232

Cited 1 times | Published

based on Florida statute § 627.727. The plaintiffs contended (1) that § 627.727 requires that all insureds

Larusso v. Garner

888 So. 2d 712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2004 | Docket: 1327731

Cited 1 times | Published

to the conclusive presumption contained in section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1993), that a knowing

Rosati v. Vaillancourt

848 So. 2d 467, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10148, 2003 WL 21511326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2003 | Docket: 64823803

Cited 1 times | Published

motor vehicle liability policy; therefore, section 627.727 is not applicable, nor does Budget’s status

Rosati v. Vaillancourt

848 So. 2d 467, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10148, 2003 WL 21511326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2003 | Docket: 64823803

Cited 1 times | Published

motor vehicle liability policy; therefore, section 627.727 is not applicable, nor does Budget’s status

Terri Van Winkle, PA v. Johnston

813 So. 2d 1065, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5130, 2002 WL 649067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2002 | Docket: 1725779

Cited 1 times | Published

of benefits for which UM coverage applies. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1995), for example, reflects

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Moher

734 So. 2d 1088, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3270, 1999 WL 147648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1999 | Docket: 2130397

Cited 1 times | Published

In this argument, State Farm is correct. See § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1991). UM coverage is excess coverage

Strochak v. Federal Insurance Co.

138 F.3d 1338, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7364

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 1229116

Cited 1 times | Published

uninsured motorist coverage based on Florida Statute § 627.727(2) (1996) in favor of Appel-lee Federal Insurance

Lewis v. Allstate Ins. Co.

667 So. 2d 261, 1995 WL 511584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 144244

Cited 1 times | Published

recover damages" from the uninsured motorist. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1983); Jones v. Integral Insurance

Beebe v. American Ambassador Cas. Co.

659 So. 2d 701, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1995 | Docket: 1462902

Cited 1 times | Published

rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 1993). Section 627.727 provides as follows: (1) No motor vehicle liability

Byron v. THE TRAVELERS INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS

601 So. 2d 1330, 1992 WL 157464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1992 | Docket: 318581

Cited 1 times | Published

insured's name to the written form required by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1988), as long as the act

Battles v. State

595 So. 2d 183, 1992 WL 31825

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1992 | Docket: 1299616

Cited 1 times | Published

construction of § 627.727(3), Florida Statutes (1985). In 1984, the legislature amended § 627.727(1) to provide

Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co.

553 So. 2d 1368, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7445, 1989 WL 153634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1989 | Docket: 1259234

Cited 1 times | Published

relied on the *1369 further provisions of Section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes (1985): The provisions

Fladell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

544 So. 2d 1056, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1324, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3044, 1989 WL 55945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1989 | Docket: 1301305

Cited 1 times | Published

CURIAM. This appeal involves a construction of section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1983), having to do with

William Diffin, Individually, and Betty Diffin, His Wife v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Caryl Anthony Vaughn Gibbs

753 F.2d 978, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28172

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 488923

Cited 1 times | Published

000 on the Lloyds policy on Florida Statute section 627.727, which, according to the Florida courts, requires

McDonald v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co.

373 So. 2d 94, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1979 | Docket: 2451723

Cited 1 times | Published

vehicle... ." This appeal by McDonald ensued. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975) (amended 1976)

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jenkins

370 So. 2d 1201, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1979 | Docket: 1722712

Cited 1 times | Published

fees, and $553 in taxable costs. We reverse. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), provides in pertinent

Guardado v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car

340 So. 2d 510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1976 | Docket: 1299772

Cited 1 times | Published

judgment as to uninsured motorist coverage under Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975). The second order

Osepchook v. Gateway Insurance Company

298 So. 2d 169

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1974 | Docket: 1730146

Cited 1 times | Published

§§ 627.730-627.741." [2] Now found in F.S. Section 627.727, F.S.A.

Geico General Insurance Company v. Benjamin Tsao and Brooke Tsao

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2024 | Docket: 69442850

Published

person legally entitled to recover damages.” § 627.727(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2022). This is known as an

Progressive Select Insurance Company v. Cindy Dunkel

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2024 | Docket: 69180490

Published

address Progressive’s first argument, we turn to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2015),2 which requires

USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Emergency Physicians, Inc. d/b/a Emergency Resources Group

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2024 | Docket: 68980597

Published

form from the insured. In contrast, section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2019), regarding uninsured

Hale v. GEICO General Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2024 | Docket: 68494099

Published

verdict by Thurman’s policy limits pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2020). It also filed two

STATE OF FLORIDA v. ANDREW SCOTT CROSE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2024 | Docket: 68195892

Published

2009) ("Because the plain language of section 627.727(6)(b) plainly states that an UM carrier 'is

REBECCA HUGHES v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 67718527

Published

PIP benefits and beyond complying with section 627.727(4). This includes the preparation and

Alberta S. Ellison v. Randy Willoughby

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2023 | Docket: 67938299

Published

motorist insurance bad faith claim are set out in section 627.727(10): “the total amount of the claimant’s damages

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anna Bevilacqua Spangler

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 3, 2023 | Docket: 65768765

Published

Argued: Nov 18, 2022

Motor- ist statute (“UM statute”). Id. § 627.727. The UM statute requires, in relevant

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY f/b/a PROGRESSIVE AUTO PRO INSURANCE COMPANY v. JANELLE OBER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2023 | Docket: 66738077

Published

appealed. In that appeal, the insurer argued section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2009), did not prohibit

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc. v. G & O REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., A/A/O MIREDY DIEGUEZ MORENO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346495

Published

uninsured motorist (“UM”) policy governed by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2007), which is distinguishable

MARVIN WHITE v. ASCENDANT COMMERCIAL INSURANCE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2022 | Docket: 63198463

Published

as uninsured or underinsured pursuant to section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes (2020), thereby making

STEVEN COCCARO and SHARON COCCARO v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2020 | Docket: 18620288

Published

coverage, commonly referred to as an M9 form. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). A signed M9 form that complies

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. JEFFREY H. WOLFSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2020 | Docket: 17288869

Published

rights against AIG, and the insurers agreed. See § 627.727(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018) (“If an injured person

American Southern Home Insurance Company v. Louis Philip Lentini, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2019 | Docket: 16761669

Published

explained below, we hold that the requirements of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2015), prohibit the limitations

OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2019 | Docket: 16381532

Published

informed-acceptance and reduced-premium requirements of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2013), if the policy

Wopshall v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

369 F. Supp. 3d 1283

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2019 | Docket: 64323553

Published

left after the tortfeasor's insurer pays. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat., and Neff v. Prop. & Cas. Ins.

Berman v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

359 F. Supp. 3d 1158

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2019 | Docket: 64322707

Published

"other" ways. Id. at 10. Florida Statutes section 627.727(1) requires insurance policies providing bodily

Eckols v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co.

260 So. 3d 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2018 | Docket: 64699946

Published

barred by the aforesaid exclusion provision. Section 627.727(9)(d), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that

Eckols v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co.

260 So. 3d 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2018 | Docket: 64699945

Published

barred by the aforesaid exclusion provision. Section 627.727(9)(d), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. MARIELLE LYDE

267 So. 3d 453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2018 | Docket: 7988759

Published

the mother's policy authorized under section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2012). As explained

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Perez

260 So. 3d 342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2018 | Docket: 64699741

Published

his motorcycle, and, alternately (ii) under section 627.727(1) of the Florida statutes (2013), GEICO was

JOHN H. JERVIS and LINDA JERVIS v. JOSE CASTANEDA and GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

243 So. 3d 996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2018 | Docket: 6375015

Published

comply with the written notice provisions of section 627.727(1) & (9), Florida Statutes (2010), 1 is

Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Cernogorsky

211 So. 3d 1119, 2017 WL 697725, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608339

Published

execute a UM coverage waiver as required by section 627.727(1) of the Florida Statutes. 3

Witherup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

214 F. Supp. 3d 1272, 2016 WL 5799770, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138122

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 64310853

Published

unless UM coverage is provided.5 Fla. *1277Stat. § 627.727(1). However, UM coverage is not required when

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Smith

198 So. 3d 852, 2016 WL 3127513, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2016 | Docket: 3069704

Published

coverage State Farm was required to provide under section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2006), the uninsured motor

Cousin v. Geico General Insurance

166 F. Supp. 3d 1290, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181678, 2015 WL 10791911

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2015 | Docket: 64307278

Published

3d 163, 165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) and Fla. Stat. § 627.727(10)). An insurance company becomes liable for

Allison Chase, etc. v. Horace Mann Insurance Company

158 So. 3d 514, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 97, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 282, 2015 WL 686093

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 2635439

Published

time, creates a new policy for purposes of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2008). We have jurisdiction

Earl Germany and Deborah Germany v. William Dewayne Darby and Federated Mutual etc.

157 So. 3d 521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2015 | Docket: 2634485

Published

(“UM”) coverage. They argued that Florida law, § 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, didn’t allow the policy

Curtis Hampton and Linda Hampton, his wife v. Florida Municipal Insurance Trust

152 So. 3d 855, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20463, 2014 WL 7150490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 2616024

Published

motorist protection as part of its provisions. See § 627.727(2), Fla. Stat (2011). The insuring agreement was

Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, etc. v. Crystal Marie Harrington

154 So. 3d 1106, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 647, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3181, 2014 WL 5365846

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2014 | Docket: 1422894

Published

UNINSURED MOTORIST BENEFITS CONFLICTS WITH SECTION 627.727(3), FLORIDA STATUTES, WHEN THE EXCLUSION IS

Wapnick v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.

134 So. 3d 968, 2014 WL 1225162, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2014 | Docket: 60239364

Published

to Fla. Stat. §§ 627.428 and 627.727(8).” Section 627.727(8) states that “[t]he provisions of s. 627

Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Chase

121 So. 3d 1191, 2013 WL 5354426, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2013 | Docket: 60234371

Published

implicated by the appellant’s argument. First, section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2008), which applies

Safeco Insurance v. Fridman

117 So. 3d 16, 2013 WL 2256531, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2013 | Docket: 60232621

Published

to confess judgment, reasoning that under section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (2007), Fridman had a

Sommerville v. Allstate Insurance Co.

65 So. 3d 558, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8987, 2011 WL 2421043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2011 | Docket: 60301733

Published

UM coverages. In enacting the UM statute, section 627.727, the legislature intended “to provide for the

Lewis v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

789 F. Supp. 2d 1289, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63552, 2011 WL 2276778

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 17, 2011 | Docket: 1992029

Published

753 F.2d 978, 980 (11th Cir. 1985); Fla. Stat. § 627.727. Evidence of a written rejection establishes a

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. King

68 So. 3d 267, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6452, 2011 WL 1709825

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2011 | Docket: 2353781

Published

underinsured motorist coverage are specified in section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (2009).[4] If attorneys'

Bessman v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

773 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32929

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2011 | Docket: 367713

Published

rejected UM/UIM coverage pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 627.727.[2] In response to Travelers' motion, the plaintiffs

Contreras v. 21st Century Insurance Co.

53 So. 3d 1194, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1569, 2011 WL 470253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 2409008

Published

SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides in pertinent

Simmons v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.

55 So. 3d 636, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1078, 2011 WL 361209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2011 | Docket: 2407052

Published

pursuant to section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (1984). There is no question that section 627.727(9) would

Nieves v. North River Insurance Co.

49 So. 3d 810, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18020, 2010 WL 4740322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2010 | Docket: 60296857

Published

excess insurer has satisfied the terms of section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes, requiring an excess carrier

Rando v. Government Employees Insurance

611 F.3d 765, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14532, 2010 WL 2773619

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 15, 2010 | Docket: 65659215

Published

satisfy the informed consent requirement of section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2005).” Rando v. Gov’t

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Duckworth

660 F. Supp. 2d 1323

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2009 | Docket: 1856006

Published

and obtain acceptance as required by Fla. Stat. § 627.727(9) (2006). (Id.) Duckworth also argues insofar

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Shaw

967 So. 2d 1011, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2007 | Docket: 64853017

Published

limits of $50,000 per person, pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2004), we reverse the

Mark Andrew Tobin v. Michigan Mutual

476 F.3d 1191, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2047

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 31, 2007 | Docket: 398830

Published

plaintiffs’ alternative argument, based on Fla. Stat. § 627.727, that the policy should be construed to provide

Somoza v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

929 So. 2d 702, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8080, 2006 WL 1409946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2006 | Docket: 64844744

Published

of the underinsured motorist liability policy. § 627.727(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). The credit is for the

USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. McDermott

929 So. 2d 1114, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873, 2006 WL 1359640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2006 | Docket: 64844797

Published

that the general public policies announced in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (2002), do not authorize

Collins v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

922 So. 2d 353, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2736, 2006 WL 470186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2006 | Docket: 64842613

Published

strictly follow the statutory requirements. Section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2005) allows insurers

Small v. New Hampshire Indemnity Co.

915 So. 2d 714, 2005 WL 3234625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2005 | Docket: 64841070

Published

statutorily permissible limitations found at section 627.727(9)(a-e), Fla. Stat. (2000), which became effective

Burlington Insurance v. Asturias USA Motorsports Co.

370 F. Supp. 2d 1272, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9976, 2005 WL 1244799

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 24, 2005 | Docket: 2392748

Published

form was not necessary under Florida Statutes § 627.727(2) because the policy was not "primary liability

Vecchio v. Van Cleave

890 So. 2d 443, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20013, 2004 WL 3000872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2004 | Docket: 64835285

Published

subrogation rights. See § 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1999). As required by section 627.727(6)(b), the UM insurer

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Petersen

855 So. 2d 1248, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15484, 2003 WL 22339210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2003 | Docket: 64825729

Published

required for recovery of fees pursuant to section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes. Appellee was involved

Stadelman v. Johnson

842 So. 2d 1001, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5621, 2003 WL 1877625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 64822194

Published

fact concerning the insurer’s compliance with section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2001). We affirm the

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Durham

838 So. 2d 1254, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3344, 2003 WL 1092753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2003 | Docket: 64821057

Published

thereafter Allstate provided the notice required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes. By 1997, the Durhams

Adelman v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.

805 So. 2d 106, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 411, 2002 WL 83749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2002 | Docket: 64811778

Published

has been altered due to statutory changes. See § 627.727, Fla. Stat. (2001). Moreover, we hold that the

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Middleton

802 So. 2d 516, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18555, 2001 WL 1671344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2001 | Docket: 64811051

Published

Morales, 533 So.2d 952 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). Accordingly, we affirm

Akel v. Dorcelus

793 So. 2d 1049, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10333, 2001 WL 830535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2001 | Docket: 64808198

Published

creating the exceptions to coverage set forth in section 627.727(9)(d). See id. at 120. As the majority notes

U.S. Security Insurance v. Doss

764 So. 2d 885, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10143, 2000 WL 1140499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 64799498

Published

expiration of the insureds’ prior policy. See § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). A review of the record

Metrix South v. Rose

758 So. 2d 1259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6574, 2000 WL 690260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2000 | Docket: 64797603

Published

of $100,000 to the appel-lees. Pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes, appellees requested that

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Vega

753 So. 2d 738, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3388, 2000 WL 293588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2000 | Docket: 64795962

Published

underin-sured/uninsured (“UIM/UM”) benefits pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1995). We conclude that

Ellman v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of North Carolina

763 So. 2d 1133, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17281, 1999 WL 1260000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 64799190

Published

summary judgment in favor of Occidental. See § 627.727(2), Fla. Stat. (1984). Occidental’s policy provided

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dixon

732 So. 2d 1, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2545, 1999 WL 123553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64788075

Published

suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience, section 627.727(7), and a clause in the State Farm policy,

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Markow

720 So. 2d 322, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14686, 1998 WL 796671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1998 | Docket: 64784139

Published

for uninsured motorist (“UM”) benefits under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1995). We reverse and

Nationwide General Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

715 So. 2d 1119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10865, 1998 WL 484394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1998 | Docket: 64782158

Published

motorist insurance coverage is addressed in section 627.727, Florida Statutes. In 1987, the legislature

Union American Insurance Co. v. Cabrera

721 So. 2d 313, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8152, 1998 WL 329430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1998 | Docket: 64784510

Published

Cabrera. (Emphasis added). The court then quoted section 627.727, Florida Statutes, at length, including: However

Armstrong v. Allstate Ins. Co.

712 So. 2d 788, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7386, 1998 WL 320225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1998 | Docket: 1471413

Published

liability insurance. Foremost, 649 So.2d at 941. Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1993), which provides for

Deison v. Progressive American Insurance

712 So. 2d 432, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8837, 1998 WL 281689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 64781316

Published

uninsured motorist coverage under the policy, or section 627.727, Florida Statutes. See Pearcy v. Travelers

Strochak v. Federal Insurance Co.

138 F.3d 1338

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 422562

Published

uninsured motorist coverage based on Florida Statute § 627.727(2) (1996) in favor of Appellee Federal Insurance

Strochak v. Federal Insurance Co.

138 F.3d 1338

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 1229994

Published

uninsured motorist coverage based on Florida Statute § 627.727(2) (1990)1 in favor of Appellee Federal Insurance

Zupan v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

710 So. 2d 594, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2266, 1998 WL 113548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1998 | Docket: 64780838

Published

rejection of coverage, or election of lower limits. § 627.727(1) (Supp.1992). It follows that if the form does

Long v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

707 So. 2d 390, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1880, 1998 WL 80442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1998 | Docket: 64779611

Published

coverage by signing a waiver which complied with section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1991). On another part of

Medina v. Peralta

705 So. 2d 703, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1139, 1998 WL 51291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1998 | Docket: 64778750

Published

of Florida held that “in actions to which section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1991), is applicable

Vest v. Travelers Insurance Co.

710 So. 2d 982, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 878, 1998 WL 17039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1998 | Docket: 64780959

Published

against the tortfeasors in accordance with section 627.727(6)(a), Florida Statutes. An order approving

Padgett v. Horace-Mann Insurance

704 So. 2d 627, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12756, 1997 WL 705634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1997 | Docket: 64778351

Published

Supplemental Application, Horace Mann relied on section 627.727(9), Fla. Stat., which provides, in pertinent

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Carr

700 So. 2d 156, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11554, 1997 WL 631976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 64776123

Published

demonstrate compliance with the filing provisions of section 627.727(9)(e), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides:

Companion v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

697 So. 2d 962, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8806, 1997 WL 429049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1997 | Docket: 64775306

Published

DCA), rev. denied, 407 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1981); § 627.727(6), Fla. Stat. (1989). There does not appear to

Creighton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

696 So. 2d 1305, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8227, 1997 WL 400090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1997 | Docket: 64775056

Published

court did not state the basis for its ruling. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991), requires UM coverage

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ledford

691 So. 2d 1164, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3995, 1997 WL 186264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1997 | Docket: 64772546

Published

limits or rejects the coverage altogether). Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991), which was in effect

Bolden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

689 So. 2d 339, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 989, 1997 WL 54796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1997 | Docket: 64771623

Published

mandate coverage, it knew how to do so. See, e.g., § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1993) (requiring insurance companies

Schutt v. ATLANTA CAS. COMPANIES

682 So. 2d 684, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11742, 1996 WL 648290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1996 | Docket: 1276398

Published

liability insurance pursuant to requirements of [section 627.727]. They may be pedestrians at the time of such

Devilliers v. Allstate Insurance Co.

681 So. 2d 885, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11089, 1996 WL 603653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 64768475

Published

asserted a claim for loss of consortium. . § 627.727, Fla.Stat. (1991).

Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny

678 So. 2d 368, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1996 | Docket: 64766704

Published

comply with the annual notice requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991),1 we find that

Bryan v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.

673 So. 2d 72, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 1996 WL 148078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1996 | Docket: 64764492

Published

654 So.2d 118, 120 (Fla.1995). By virtue of section 627.727(9)(d), Florida Statutes (1995), an insurer

Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zarahn

666 So. 2d 1034, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1996 WL 27889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1996 | Docket: 64761727

Published

final judgment ruling that the provisions of section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), are procedural

Yablon v. North River Insurance Co.

654 So. 2d 1033, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5323, 1995 WL 296209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1995 | Docket: 64756207

Published

for the trial court to determine was whether section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1986), and the Yablons’

Hartford Insurance Co. of the Southeast v. Blackmore

651 So. 2d 1220, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1998, 1995 WL 80661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1995 | Docket: 64755026

Published

1995, for rehearing based on recent case holding § 627.727(6) unconstitutional is hereby denied; further

Cook v. Sheriff's Automobile Risk Program

645 So. 2d 1129, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12204, 1994 WL 697978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1994 | Docket: 64752404

Published

an insurance company within the meaning of section 627.727, and therefore Cook is entitled to receive

Moskowitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

646 So. 2d 262, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11475, 1994 WL 665385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1994 | Docket: 64752507

Published

giving written notice, as is required .by section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1993), to his insurance

Allstate Insurance v. Ferrante

645 So. 2d 1060, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11021, 1994 WL 637732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752348

Published

permissible under Section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). Section 627.727(9) is the portion

Government Employees Insurance v. Jenkins

642 So. 2d 1193, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9382, 1994 WL 531270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 64751041

Published

statute in Welker. In 1987, subsection 9 of section 627.727 was added. Subsection 9 appears to elucidate

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. DeJohn

640 So. 2d 158, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7507, 1994 WL 390781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1994 | Docket: 64749905

Published

cert. discharged, 172 So.2d 450 (Fla.1965). Section 627.727,2 Florida Statutes (1991) requires an insurance

Browne v. Dealers Insurance Co.

640 So. 2d 78, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4143, 1994 WL 162873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1994 | Docket: 64749883

Published

Underwriters likewise does not discuss the effect of section 627.727(9) on the validity of an exclusion of uninsured

Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Obenland

629 So. 2d 265, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12328, 1993 WL 523945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1993 | Docket: 64745010

Published

Illinois statute or the similar Florida statute (see § 627.727(6), Fla.Stat. (1991)) is necessary in order to

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Laforet

632 So. 2d 608, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 64746557

Published

post-trial motion for additur, based upon amended section 627.727(10), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), which states:

Teachers Ins. Co. v. Bollman

617 So. 2d 817, 1993 WL 135712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1993 | Docket: 457757

Published

coverage in writing," within the meaning of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991), but also manifested

Chery v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

616 So. 2d 505, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3422, 1993 WL 72268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1993 | Docket: 64695372

Published

DCA), review denied, 518 So.2d 1276 (Fla.1987); § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Adams v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

147 F.R.D. 265, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3564, 1993 WL 85708

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1993 | Docket: 66307086

Published

of Florida, which added § 627.727(10) to the Florida Statutes. Section 627.727(10) explicitly provides

Liscio v. Montgomery Ward Insurance Co.

603 So. 2d 76, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8082, 1992 WL 175530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1992 | Docket: 64669195

Published

without insurance) cause damage to an insured. § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). Thus, the question of the

Meadows v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.

601 So. 2d 1285, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7296, 1992 WL 150871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1992 | Docket: 64668793

Published

unavailable in this case, in any event. Pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987), UIM coverage is over

Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Sapienza

596 So. 2d 84, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1720, 1992 WL 32792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1992 | Docket: 64666213

Published

uninsured motorist provision, compliance with section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987) was required. Sapienza

State, Department of Labor & Employment Security, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Livingston

592 So. 2d 721, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12928, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 64664730

Published

that governing uninsured motorists coverage, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1985). An award under the

Nathan v. Wilholt

586 So. 2d 1235, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9130, 1991 WL 182091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1991 | Docket: 64662121

Published

000/1,000,000 bodily injury liability coverage. § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). The case was tried to a

State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Koster

582 So. 2d 735, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6557, 1991 WL 120768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1991 | Docket: 64660143

Published

061, Florida Statutes, are discretionary. Section 627.727 provides: (8) The provisions of § 627.428 do

National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Chase

575 So. 2d 720, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 1991 WL 18246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1991 | Docket: 64656855

Published

uninsured motorists coverage, pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1985). On August 19,

Metts v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co.

573 So. 2d 1068, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1012, 1991 WL 15579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1991 | Docket: 64656105

Published

statutory minimum requirements set forth by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984). Reversed and

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kalesa

573 So. 2d 838, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 217, 1991 WL 16331

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1991 | Docket: 64656020

Published

of “uninsured motor vehicle” contained in section 627.727(3), Florida Statutes, (Supp.1988) (as amended

Wardrop ex rel. Wardrop v. Government Employment Insurance Co.

567 So. 2d 1012, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7682, 1990 WL 149801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1990 | Docket: 64653579

Published

issue before us on appeal is whether under Section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1987), joinder of both

Avila v. Diversified Services, Inc.

565 So. 2d 759, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5198, 1990 WL 98597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1990 | Docket: 64652391

Published

uninsured motorist coverage in violation of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1989). Construing the

Quinn v. Amerisure Insurance Co.

568 So. 2d 1277, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3353, 1990 WL 64132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1990 | Docket: 64654150

Published

to Quinn. See § 627.727(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1984). The 1984 amendment to section 627.727(1) (which applies

Perez v. Great Republic Insurance Co.

559 So. 2d 1266, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2579, 1990 WL 45521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1990 | Docket: 64649772

Published

entered against the underin-sured motorist insurer. § 627.727(6), Fla. Stat. (1987). Affirmed.

Northbrook Property & Casualty Co. v. Bucci

553 So. 2d 1285, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2799, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6766, 1989 WL 146024

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1989 | Docket: 64647070

Published

uninsured motorist coverage is consistent with section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987).

Bendell v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

551 So. 2d 1280, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6326, 1989 WL 136087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 64646142

Published

Moudy, 547 So.2d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Section 627.727(8), Florida Statutes (1987) restricts the award

Williams v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

549 So. 2d 253, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2267, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1989 | Docket: 64645201

Published

imposed on insurance companies in this state by section 627.727(1) that the insured make a “knowing rejection

Otero v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.

548 So. 2d 686, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1643, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3731, 1989 WL 73176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1989 | Docket: 64644796

Published

available for the tortfeasor’s liability, see § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1983); Dewberry v. Auto-Owners

Scalf v. Laurain

540 So. 2d 933, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 829, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 1989 WL 31019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1989 | Docket: 64641392

Published

attorney’s fees. Appellee insurer argues that section 627.-727(8), Florida Statutes, authorizing attorney’s

Gazie v. Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau

534 So. 2d 1171, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2266, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4395, 1988 WL 101054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1988 | Docket: 64639054

Published

1086 (Fla.1982), the Supreme Court discussed section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975), and clearly placed

Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co.

527 So. 2d 835, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 1988 WL 70668

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 64635724

Published

controlling here because the amendment to section 627.727, Florida Statutes, is applicable only to new

McMamara v. Seibert

537 So. 2d 1009, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1223, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2031, 1988 WL 48803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1988 | Docket: 64640159

Published

person for purposes of bodily injury to her. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983) provides in part

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. McDonald

525 So. 2d 455, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1120, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1825

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 64634887

Published

endorsement, the court concluded that, under section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, St. Paul was required

Peel v. Allstate Insurance Co.

522 So. 2d 505, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1074, 1988 WL 22256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1988 | Docket: 64633678

Published

in the trial court and contends here that section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), made the UM

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fitzgerald

521 So. 2d 122, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2718, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11267, 1987 WL 1946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 64633120

Published

insured under the policy in the context of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983); and that therefore

Orion Insurance Co. v. Socias

513 So. 2d 233, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12201, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1987 | Docket: 64629782

Published

Summary Final Judgment in favor of appellee. § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984). Cf Northern Ins. Co

Orion Insurance Co. v. Socias

513 So. 2d 233, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12201, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1987 | Docket: 64629782

Published

Summary Final Judgment in favor of appellee. § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984). Cf Northern Ins. Co

Admiral Insurance Co. v. Rockwell

515 So. 2d 246, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1987 | Docket: 64630805

Published

rejection. ... Although the trial court ruled that section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), did not require a

Mondello v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

507 So. 2d 1178, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1353, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1987 | Docket: 64627478

Published

providing liability insurance, pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979), it is also responsible

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hamilton ex rel. Hamilton

501 So. 2d 104, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 297, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 64624396

Published

“solely on the interpretation of Florida Statute § 627.727 as well as the language contained in STATE FARM’S

Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Coleman

501 So. 2d 32, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 150, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64624381

Published

$100,000/$300,000 should be implied because section 627.727(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), requires an

Pawlik v. Stevens

499 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 43, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 64623805

Published

bodily injury liability limits as provided by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979). We reverse the

Ferrigno v. Yoder

495 So. 2d 886, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2180, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1986 | Docket: 64622229

Published

with a “knowing rejection” form, required by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, to select uninsured motorist

Alpha Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Guzman

497 So. 2d 276, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2127, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 64622842

Published

1966), cert. denied, 200 So.2d 813 (Fla.1967); § 627.727, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984). Reversed and remanded

Duane v. Travelers Insurance Co.

496 So. 2d 859, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2095, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1986 | Docket: 64622618

Published

court dismissed the complaint and we affirm. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981)1 provides in part

Hartford Insurance Co. of the Southeast v. Pearson

495 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1993, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1986 | Docket: 64622297

Published

explanation concerning uninsured motorist insurance. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1980), states that

Incardona v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

494 So. 2d 513, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1857, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1986 | Docket: 64621820

Published

recognized that Mullís construed what is now section 627.-727, Florida Statutes (1985), to mandate uninsured

Milano v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

491 So. 2d 1302, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1986 | Docket: 64620853

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1983); see Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Poklman, 485

Sims v. Allstate Insurance Co.

490 So. 2d 1074, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1523, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 64620377

Published

uninsured motorist coverage provided for by section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1977), even though such

LoCicero v. American Liberty Insurance Co.

489 So. 2d 81, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 987, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7463

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1986 | Docket: 64619696

Published

pursuant to the requirements of Georgia law and section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1981). That prior order

Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

479 So. 2d 160, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2563, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16796

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1985 | Docket: 64615869

Published

was not an uninsured motorist as defined in section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983). We disagree. The

Guarantee Insurance Co. v. Sloop

473 So. 2d 784, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1904, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1985 | Docket: 64613511

Published

coverage from the Authority as is required in section 627.727, Florida Statutes. At the moment when the Authority

Spira v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.

468 So. 2d 540, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14196, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1985 | Docket: 64611828

Published

equal to excess liability limits pursuant to section 627.-727(1), Florida Statutes (1983). We base our decision

Banack v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

467 So. 2d 842, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1079, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1985 | Docket: 64611521

Published

motorist coverage in effect at that time was section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes, effective 1971. FIGA

Noaker ex rel. Noaker v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co.

468 So. 2d 330, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 941, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1985 | Docket: 64611736

Published

injury liability coverage as re*332quired by section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1983). We acknowledge

New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Conner

468 So. 2d 324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 936, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1985 | Docket: 64611735

Published

equal to their liability limits pursuant to section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1977). However, we reduce

Prinzo ex rel. Puleo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

465 So. 2d 1364, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 816, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1985 | Docket: 64610862

Published

1982). As to uninsured motorist insurance, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that uninsured

Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Velazquez

464 So. 2d 210, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 470, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1985 | Docket: 64610166

Published

selection of lower uninsured motorist limits under Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979); in this connection

Cullars v. Manatee County

463 So. 2d 484, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 364, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14577

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 64609884

Published

require that such a rejection be in writing. § 627.-727(1), Fla.Stat. (1983); Kimbrell v. Great American

Graham v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

459 So. 2d 484, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1984 | Docket: 64608308

Published

question presented on this appeal is whether section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1979), required the appellee

Johnson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

451 So. 2d 898, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1984 | Docket: 64605454

Published

intent of Florida’s Uninsured Motorist Statute, Section 627.-727, Florida Statutes (1983), which is to allow

Tarlton v. Dixie Insurance Co.

450 So. 2d 300, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1984 | Docket: 64604857

Published

Ms. Tarlton signed a form explaining that section 627.727(2), Florida Statutes (1979), required insurers

Granite State Insurance Co. v. Lane

448 So. 2d 1174, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1984 | Docket: 64604316

Published

had issued several opinions determining that section 627.727, Florida Statutes, required that rejection

Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Solomon

444 So. 2d 1123, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1984 | Docket: 64602590

Published

limits because, in direct contravention of Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), it did not offer

American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Bigger

442 So. 2d 1109, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1983 | Docket: 64601848

Published

higher uninsured motorist benefits (U.M.) under Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976). The trial

Ruiz v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

441 So. 2d 681, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1983 | Docket: 64601145

Published

the policy. In 1980 our legislature amended section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1979), by, inter alia, adding

Padron v. H.W.G. Leasing, Inc.

436 So. 2d 982, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1983 | Docket: 64599225

Published

Liberty Mutual nor its agent complied with section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979), in that Padron

Rhodes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

437 So. 2d 155, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1983 | Docket: 64599356

Published

of uninsured motorist coverage pursuant to section 627.-727, Florida Statutes, is required when a vehicle

New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Conner

435 So. 2d 274, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1983 | Docket: 64598510

Published

HOBSON, A.C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur. . Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes. . We note that the

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Mitchell

433 So. 2d 579, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19458

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1983 | Docket: 64597822

Published

Mitchell was an insured under the policy. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), has been interpreted

Allstate Insurance v. Collier

428 So. 2d 379, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1983 | Docket: 64595769

Published

to join her claim with that of her husband. Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1981) is a general provision

Lambert v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

426 So. 2d 1194, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1983 | Docket: 64595134

Published

Lambert’s counterclaim for the reason that Section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1979), afforded Lambert

Scatigno v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

425 So. 2d 217, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1983 | Docket: 64594678

Published

to require a written waiver of coverage. See § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1982). This change is effective

Hunter v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin

427 So. 2d 199, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1982 | Docket: 64595238

Published

rejection under the subsequent policies. See § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). Appellant now contends that

Fenner v. McLowhorn

424 So. 2d 50, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1982 | Docket: 64594362

Published

even though the other tortfeasor is uninsured. § 627.727, Fla.Stat. (1977); United States Fidelity & Guaranty

Daly v. Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.

422 So. 2d 1093, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1982 | Docket: 64593794

Published

violated the spirit, if not the letter, of Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979). We do not condone

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Dwyer

421 So. 2d 587, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 64593109

Published

Liberty Mutual nor its agent complied with Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1979), in that Dwyer

Richmond v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

420 So. 2d 360, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1982 | Docket: 64592519

Published

and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., J., concur. . Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1981), reads in part:

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Neduchal

418 So. 2d 248, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2488

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1982 | Docket: 64591745

Published

-000. The district court of appeal reversed. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), as it stood at

Stolfi v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

416 So. 2d 43, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1982 | Docket: 64590930

Published

uninsured motorist. The law then in effect, Section 627.-727, Florida Statutes (1977), voids Prudential’s

Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

412 So. 2d 44, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1982 | Docket: 64589046

Published

1974), cert. denied, 308 So.2d 114 (Fla.1975); § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (1979).

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Spewock

411 So. 2d 910, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1982 | Docket: 64588856

Published

injured in Florida. Further, the fact that section 627.-727(1) expressly contemplates the possibility

Lustig v. Colonial Penn Insurance

406 So. 2d 543, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1981 | Docket: 64586311

Published

limited uninsured motorist coverage to $15,000.1 Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1979), the governing statute

Douglas v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance

400 So. 2d 187, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1981 | Docket: 64583447

Published

Court to consider the following question: Whether § 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1978) requires that an insurer’s

Kenilworth Insurance v. McCormick

394 So. 2d 1037, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1981 | Docket: 64580804

Published

of uninsured motorist benefits pursuant to Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), when the change-of-car

Midland Insurance Co. v. Hochberg

394 So. 2d 449, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1981 | Docket: 64580598

Published

Midland properly concedes that by virtue of Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), Genway’s rejection

Figueredo v. Leatherby Insurance Co.

392 So. 2d 287, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1980 | Docket: 64579575

Published

tortfeasor’s liability coverage pursuant to Section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) 1. The judgments

Sabina v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

390 So. 2d 1215, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1980 | Docket: 64579105

Published

of uninsured motorist coverage required by Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), must be knowingly

Finocchio v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

389 So. 2d 1246, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1980 | Docket: 64578737

Published

-000. Appellant contends that Florida Statutes § 627.727(1), as amended effective October 1,1979,1 should

Porter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

385 So. 2d 1100, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1980 | Docket: 64577296

Published

merit since the Porters correctly relied upon Section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1977),1 which calls upon

Atkins v. Allstate Insurance

382 So. 2d 1276, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1980 | Docket: 64575789

Published

its rights under the insurance policy and Section 627.727, Florida Statutes, regarding the question of

Carrazana v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

374 So. 2d 581, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1979 | Docket: 64571681

Published

Co., 258 So.2d 277 (Fla.3d DCA 1972). See also § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). Accordingly, the order appealed

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Builes

370 So. 2d 863, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 20976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1979 | Docket: 64570114

Published

Insurance Co., 277 So.2d 839, 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); § 627.727(3), Fla.Stat. (1973).

Brown v. American Motorists Insurance

368 So. 2d 597, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1978 | Docket: 64569061

Published

by law and must be affirmatively rejected, Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1977), any such waiver

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Means

362 So. 2d 135, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1978 | Docket: 64565903

Published

agree that the applicable Florida statute is Section 627.727 (1972), prior to amendments in 1973 which added

Del Toro v. Allstate Insurance Co.

360 So. 2d 432, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1978 | Docket: 64565239

Published

on this appeal calls for a construction of Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1973). The portion of the

Coney v. Reserve Insurance Co.

358 So. 2d 261, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1978 | Docket: 64564278

Published

motorist provisions of their policies pursuant to Section 627.727(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1973),2 which includes

Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Beebe

340 So. 2d 1257, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1976 | Docket: 64556538

Published

her insolvent insurer, as provided for in Section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1975), the plaintiff Paula

Kiertekles v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co.

323 So. 2d 317, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 64551014

Published

for uninsured motorist coverage. See Fla. Stat. § 627.727; Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

McClendon v. United States Fire Insurance

305 So. 2d 237, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1974 | Docket: 64543498

Published

provide personal injury protection coverage under § 627.727 Fla.Stats., F.S.A. and (2) an individual not owning

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Clay

299 So. 2d 95, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1974 | Docket: 64540702

Published

judgment that Liberty Mutual now appeals. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes 1971, is the codification

Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Roberts

287 So. 2d 362, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1973 | Docket: 64536322

Published

and the same is hereby affirmed. Affirmed. . § 627.727 (1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., providing for uninsured

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Saumell

273 So. 2d 101, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 64530360

Published

judgment appealed, on the ground that pursuant to § 627.727(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the appellees must present

Jimenez v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

270 So. 2d 406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1972 | Docket: 64529298

Published

Insurance Group, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 698; F.S. § 627.727(3), F.S.A. Affirmed.

Jimenez v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

270 So. 2d 406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1972 | Docket: 64529298

Published

Insurance Group, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 698; F.S. § 627.727(3), F.S.A. Affirmed.

Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Santiesteban

266 So. 2d 102, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1972 | Docket: 64527389

Published

1969, F.S. A., recently renumbered and amended § 627.727, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. and Ch. 324, Fla. Stat., F

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 627 in the context of insurance coverage law and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.