Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 627.730 (2025)
Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes: current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
627.730 Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.—Sections 627.730-627.7405 may be cited and known as the “Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.”
History.—s. 1, ch. 71-252; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 549, 563, ch. 82-243; s. 19, ch. 2003-411; s. 8, ch. 2007-324.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 114
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case: William Joyce v. Federated Nat'l Ins. Co., 228 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2017).
William Joyce v. Federated Nat'l Ins. Co., 228 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2017). “See generally §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2017) (“Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law”).”
Kluger v. White, 281 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1973). “"(2) Every insurer providing security under §§ 627.730-627.741 shall offer the owner either full or basic coverage for accidental property damage to the insured motor vehicle, as follows: "(a) Full coverage shall provide insurance without regard to fault for accidents occurring…”
Fortune Ins. v. Owens, 526 S.E.2d 463 (N.C. 2000). “See Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 627.730-627.7405 (West 1996 & Supp.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006). “1] §§ 627.730-.7405, Fla. Stat. (2001). Application of the Offer of Judgment Statute Would Circumvent the Purposes of the No-Fault Law and Pip Benefits In order to properly determine whether the offer of judgment statute found in section 768.”
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007). “[4] Section 627.730, Florida Statutes (2006), states that "[s]ections 627.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. First Care Solution, Inc., 232 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “Fla. Stat. §§ 627.730-627.7405 . The law sets forth what benefits are covered under PIP, stating in pertinent part that “the medical benefits shall provide reimbursement only for such services and care that are lawfully provided, supervised, ordered or prescribed.”
Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013). “736(1) for reimbursement based on “reasonable expenses” and the policy requirement for payment of eighty percent of medical expenses in accordance with the terms of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2008). The majority relies on Kingsway ⅛…”
Marisela Herrera v. JFK Med. Ctr. Ltd. P'ship, 648 F. App'x 930 (11th Cir. 2016). “Background Under the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, Fla Stat. § 627.730 et seq., owners of motor vehicles registered in the State of Florida are required to purchase personal injury protection (“PIP”) insurance coverage of ,000.”
Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000). “736(3) provides that "An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of §§ 627.730-627.7405, or his legal representative, shall have no right to recover any damages for which personal injury protection benefits are paid or payable.”
Geico Indem. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “See § 627.730, Fla. Stat. (2008) (“Sections 627.”
United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). “§§ 627.730, 627.731, Fla. Stat. (1997). Section 627.”
Nichols v. State Farm Mut., 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). “When an offer contains as a condition a "general release," care should be taken to insure that the proposed release does not seek to extinguish claims that are extrinsic to the litigation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.