627.730
Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 114
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case: William Joyce v. Federated National Insurance Company
William Joyce v. Federated National Insurance Company (2017)
“See generally §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2017) (“Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law”).”
Kluger v. White (1973)
“"(2) Every insurer providing security under §§ 627.730-627.741 shall offer the owner either full or basic coverage for accidental property damage to the insured motor vehicle, as follows: "(a) Full coverage shall provide insurance without regard to fault for accidents occurring…”
Fortune Insurance v. Owens (2000)
“See Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 627.730-627.7405 (West 1996 & Supp.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols (2006)
“1] §§ 627.730-.7405, Fla. Stat. (2001). Application of the Offer of Judgment Statute Would Circumvent the Purposes of the No-Fault Law and Pip Benefits In order to properly determine whether the offer of judgment statute found in section 768.”
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. (2007)
“[4] Section 627.730, Florida Statutes (2006), states that "[s]ections 627.”
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. First Care Solution, Inc. (2017)
“Fla. Stat. §§ 627.730-627.7405 . The law sets forth what benefits are covered under PIP, stating in pertinent part that “the medical benefits shall provide reimbursement only for such services and care that are lawfully provided, supervised, ordered or prescribed.”
Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc. (2013)
“736(1) for reimbursement based on “reasonable expenses” and the policy requirement for payment of eighty percent of medical expenses in accordance with the terms of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, §§ 627.730-627.7405, Fla. Stat. (2008). The majority relies on Kingsway ⅛…”
Marisela Herrera v. JFK Medical Center Limited Partnership (2016)
“Background Under the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, Fla Stat. § 627.730 et seq., owners of motor vehicles registered in the State of Florida are required to purchase personal injury protection (“PIP”) insurance coverage of ,000.”
Rollins v. Pizzarelli (2000)
“736(3) provides that "An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of §§ 627.730-627.7405, or his legal representative, shall have no right to recover any damages for which personal injury protection benefits are paid or payable.”
Geico Indemnity Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc. (2011)
“See § 627.730, Fla. Stat. (2008) (“Sections 627.”
United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez (2001)
“§§ 627.730, 627.731, Fla. Stat. (1997). Section 627.”
Nichols v. State Farm Mut. (2003)
“When an offer contains as a condition a "general release," care should be taken to insure that the proposed release does not seek to extinguish claims that are extrinsic to the litigation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.