Syfert Injury Law Firm

Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Florida Hospital Ocala, Inc. D/B/A Adventhealth Ocala A/A/O Sandra Thomas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-14

Snippet: vehicle insurance securing such benefits.” § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2019). The No-Fault Law requires “[e]very

MERCURY IDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA vs CENTRAL FLORIDA MEDICAL & CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, INC. D/B/A STERLING MEDICAL GROUP A/A/O STHEFANY SANTIAGO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-10-27

Snippet: the statute’s express purpose stated in section 627.731. But again, the text in that section does not establish

MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. PAN AM DIAGNOSTIC OF ORLANDO, a/a/o JOCELINE PIERRILUS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-06-07

Snippet: insurance benefits without regard to fault. . . .” § 627.731, Fla. Statutes (2017). The Florida Supreme Court

HERMAN COLE v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-03

Snippet: securing such benefits.” Id. at 876- 87 (quoting § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2006)). The same considerations are

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, LLC, A/A/O ANGELA COOPER v. STAR CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-02-22

Snippet: vehicle insurance securing such benefits.” § 627.731, Fla. Stat. The Florida Supreme Court has stated

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PAN AM DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. d/b/a PAN AM DIAGNOSTIC OF ORLANDO a/a/o CLAUDINE JEAN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-17

Snippet: suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience. § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2019) (emphasis added). The other

BARTOW HMA, INC. d/b/a BARTOW REGIONAL CENTER, etc. v. SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-07-14

Snippet: benefits.’” Virtual III, 141 So. 3d at 152 (quoting § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2008)). “The PIP statute, codified

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHIROPRACTIC CLINICS OF SOUTH FLORIDA, PL, A/A/O MICHAEL AKINS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-16

Snippet: lost wages without regard to fault. See, e.g., §§ 627.731, 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2020). PIP benefits are an

FLORIDA PAIN & REHABILITATION OF WEST DADE v. INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-21

Snippet: vehicles required to be registered in this state.” § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2018). To comply with these sections

DAVID RIVERA v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-24

Snippet: vehicle insurance securing such benefits . . . .” § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2014). “Without a doubt, the purpose

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. M R I ASSOCIATES OF TAMPA, INC. D/ B/ A PARK PLACE M R I

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-18

Snippet: securing such benefits." Id. at 152 (quoting § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2008)). The mandate that an insurer

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. M R I ASSOCIATES OF TAMPA, INC. D/ B/ A PARK PLACE M R I

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-18

Citation: 252 So. 3d 773

Snippet: securing such benefits." Id. at 152 (quoting § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2008)). The mandate that an insurer

Geico General Insurance Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-03

Citation: 141 So. 3d 147, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 2013 WL 3332385, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1387

Snippet: vehicle insurance securing such benefits.” See § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2008). The PIP statute, codified in

Sheldon v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-28

Citation: 55 So. 3d 593, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20245

Snippet: forced to sue to recover those benefits. See § 627.731 Fla. Stat. (2008). As Dr. Sheldon acknowledges

Sheldon v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-28

Citation: 55 So. 3d 593, 2010 WL 5306461

Snippet: forced to sue to recover those benefits. See § 627.731 Fla. Stat. (2008). As Dr. Sheldon acknowledges

Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-04-22

Citation: 35 So. 3d 873, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 222, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 581, 2010 WL 1609785

Snippet: vehicle insurance securing such *877 benefits." § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2006); accord United Auto. Ins. Co

Florida Medical & Injury Center, Inc. v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-01-22

Citation: 29 So. 3d 329, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 420

Snippet: actually more akin to the D & A form. [7] See § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2008). [8] Ivey v. Allstate Ins.

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Custer Medical Center

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-10

Citation: 990 So. 2d 633, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13844, 2008 WL 4146365

Snippet: lost wages without regard to fault. See, e.g., §§ 627.731, 736, Fla. Stat. (1997)." Flores v. Allstate Ins

Progressive American Ins. Co. v. Stand-Up MRI of Orlando

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-07-11

Citation: 990 So. 2d 3, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10525, 2008 WL 2695876

Snippet: motor vehicle insurance securing such benefits." § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2006).... The "Required Personal Injury

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-07-12

Citation: 961 So. 2d 328, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 453, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1228, 2007 WL 2002542

Snippet: motor vehicle insurance securing such benefits." § 627.731, Fla. Stat. (2006); accord United Auto. Ins. Co