Cases from cite.case.law:

BOLZ, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 679 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . After considering the motion and the argument of counsel, the trial court, based upon section 627.7403 . . . Bolz was improperly denied her right to show “good cause” under section 627.7403, and because of the . . .

TAYLOR, By M. PARKER, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a, 622 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . good cause was shown why such derivative claims should be brought separately as required by section 627.7403 . . .

ROSEN, a By ROSEN a v. ZORZOS d b a A-, 449 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The jurisdictional issue raised by appel-lees — whether section 627.7403, Florida Statutes (1980) requires . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COLLIER,, 428 So. 2d 379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . .-737 so as to trigger the mandatory joinder provision of section 627.7403. . . . “action brought pursuant to the provisions of section 627.737 _” This, of course, triggers section 627.7403 . . . by her husband in the initial automobile accident, she is bound by the mandatory language of section 627.7403 . . . only one point on appeal, namely: WHETHER THE MANDATORY JOIN-DER OF DERIVATIVE CLAIMS STATUTE, SECTION 627.7403 . . . Collier’s claim was barred by the provisions of section 627.7403. . . . Collier’s claim is barred by section 627.7403, Florida Statutes, which states: In any action brought . . . In our view section 627.7403 was enacted to mandate joinder of all personal injury claims in a single . . .