627.7403
Mandatory joinder of derivative claim.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
627.7403 Mandatory joinder of derivative claim.—In any action brought pursuant to the provisions of s. 627.737 claiming personal injuries, all claims arising out of the plaintiff’s injuries, including all derivative claims, shall be brought together, unless good cause is shown why such claims should be brought separately.
History.—s. 38, ch. 77-468; s. 2, ch. 81-318; s. 563, ch. 82-243; s. 19, ch. 2003-411; s. 17, ch. 2007-324.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1983–1996 · leading case: Bolz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Bolz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (1996)
“Copies of motions for summary judgment and a final summary judgment in another action in which the parties were involved were attached to the motion.”
Allstate Insurance v. Collier (1983)
“Collier’s claim is barred by section 627.7403, Florida Statutes, which states: In any action brought pursuant to the provisions of s.”
Rosen ex rel. Rosen v. Zorzos (1984)
“9 The jurisdictional issue raised by appel-lees — whether section 627.7403, Florida Statutes (1980) requires that appellants bring all derivative claims arising out of plaintiff’s injuries in one action — cannot be *364 answered with reference to the record before us because…”
ROSEN BY AND THROUGH ROSEN v. Zorzos (1984)
“[9] The jurisdictional issue raised by appellees whether section 627.7403, Florida Statutes (1980) requires that appellants bring all derivative claims arising out of plaintiff's injuries in one action cannot be *364 answered with reference to the record before us because…”
Taylor ex rel. Parker v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (1993)
“note that the trial court erred in its initial failure to enter summary judgment for GMAC, as it requested, on the basis that the Taylors failed to properly join their derivative claim with that of their father, Laury Taylor, the injured party, in his original suit against GMAC,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.