CopyCited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 2013 WL 3332385, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1387
...The 2008 amendments provided, in part, more specific guidelines regarding a PIP insurer’s ability to limit reimbursements. *154 Specifically, these provisions provided that insurers “may limit reimbursement” to eighty percent of a schedule of maximum charges set forth in the PIP statute. § 627.786(5)(a)2., Fla....
0 red0 yellow28 green0 procedural
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 189632
...4th DCA 1991) (an agent can be the agent of the insurance company for one purpose and the agent of the insured for other purposes). Florida has a statute which authorizes a title insurer to undertake more responsibility in a closing besides issuing a title policy. Section 627.786(3), Florida Statutes (1987) authorizes the title insurance company to assume responsibility for losses arising out of a closing by "providing instruments to any prospective insured, in the form and content approved by the department [...
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMazel (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityProctor (2008)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1748554, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6626
...As in this case, the insurer would have to look beyond the CPT code to determine whether the services represented in the code are reimbursable under Medicare Part B. We understand that this complicates the reimbursement process under the PIP statute. Nonetheless, we are bound by the plain language of section 627.786(5)(a)(2)(f), which does not require a CPT code to be recognized by Medicare Part B if the services are otherwise covered and reimbursable under Medicare Part B....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 440, 2013 WL 3214401, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1315
...575 , 577 n. 3 (Fla. 11th Cir.Ct. Apr. 7, 2011). More than just persuasive, Custer is correct under the terms of the PIP statute, its underlying purpose of swift and virtually automatic payment to the insured, and relevant caselaw. *393 1. The PIP Statute Section 627.786, Florida Statutes (2008), is silent regarding EUOs — it does not authorize their use, much less denial of benefits for failure to attend one....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
...ame from Florida policies. How-
ever, one thing FIC does not offer is title insurance. Under Florida
law, entities that issue title insurance are prohibited from selling
any other type of insurance, and vice versa. Fla. Stat. § 627.786....
0 red0 yellow10 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityCarter (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityDrummond (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15503
...excepted from such coverage. Thereafter the trial court, as a result of this interpretation of the exclusionary term “motorcycle,” held that Nicholson was entitled to recover PIP benefits from State Farm. The relevant statute in the Act is F.S. § 627.786(4)(d)(l) which provides that benefits obtain for, “Accidental bodily injury sustained in this state by the owner while occupying a motor vehicle or while not an occupant of a motor vehicle or motorcycle if the injury is caused by physica...
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityO'KELLEY (1977)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11913, 2000 WL 1345932
...Without reaching the legal analysis in the circuit court opinion, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari. By the time State Farm requested an examination *623 ■under oath on June 4, the claim filed on April 29 was already overdue under the thirty day provision of section 627.786(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1999)....
CopyPublished | District Court, S.D. Florida | 11 Fed. R. Serv. 1767, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15750
...*304 ISSUES In this case, a hearing was requested by Escrow Disbursement Insurance Agency, Inc. (EDI) to resolve three issues. The first issue was whether "escrow letters" or "insured closing letters" issued by title insurance companies in the state of Florida are prohibited by Fla.Stat. § 627.786....
