Florida Statute 628.041 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 628
STOCK AND MUTUAL INSURERS; HOLDING COMPANIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 628.041

628.041 Applicability of general corporation statutes.—The applicable statutes of this state relating to the powers and procedures of domestic private corporations formed for profit shall apply to domestic stock insurers and to domestic mutual insurers, except:

(1) As to any domestic mutual insurers incorporated pursuant to chapter 617, which chapter shall govern such insurers when in conflict with part I of chapter 607; and

(2) When in conflict with the express provisions of this code.

History.—s. 624, ch. 59-205; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 633, 665, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 55, ch. 2014-209.

F.S. 628.041 on Google Scholar

F.S. 628.041 on Casetext

Amendments to 628.041

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 628.041

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 628.041.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 628.041

Total Results: 20

Ball v. Florida Podiatrist Trust

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-05-07

Citation: 620 So. 2d 1018, 1993 WL 143947

Snippet: corporations is apposite to mutual insurers. See § 628.041, Fla. Stat. ("[t]he applicable statutes of this

Estate of Conger v. Conger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-04

Citation: 414 So. 2d 230

Snippet: actions. McIver ignores the effect of Section 628.041, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides that the

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. v. Medeira Beach Nom., Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-01-26

Citation: 272 So. 2d 209

Snippet: South Shore Land Co. v. Petersen, 230 Cal. App.2d 628, 41 Cal. Rptr. 277, 279 (1st Dist. Div. 2 1967). The

Ocean Beach Hotel Company v. Town of Atlantic Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-06-10

Citation: 2 So. 2d 879, 147 Fla. 445

Snippet: 21 So. 290; Wade v. Atlantic Lbr. Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72; Ex Parte Knight, 52 Fla. 144,41 So. 786;

A. M. Klemm & Son v. City of Winter Haven

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-12-12

Citation: 192 So. 652, 141 Fla. 60, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1319

Snippet: So. 789; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72; Disston v. I. I. Board, 75 Fla. 653, 79

Bristol-Myers Co. v. Webb's Cut-Rate Drug Co., Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-04-14

Citation: 188 So. 91, 137 Fla. 508, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1862

Snippet: So. 290; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72; Exparte Knight, et al., 52 Fla. 144, 41

City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & Son

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-04-05

Citation: 181 So. 153, 132 Fla. 334

Snippet: cited. In Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So.2d 72, and like cases, the doctrine of de facto

City of Hialeah v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'n

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-04-14

Citation: 174 So. 843, 128 Fla. 46

Snippet: So. 441, Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72; and other cases where the title was misleading

Messer v. Jackson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-12-28

Citation: 171 So. 660, 126 Fla. 678, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1669

Snippet: So. 375; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72. In State v. Love, 99 Fla. 333, 126 So

Freeman v. Simmons

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-12-21

Citation: 145 So. 187, 107 Fla. 438

Snippet: So. 343; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72; Volusia County v. State, 98 Fla. 1166,

Colonial Investment Co. v. Nolan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-11-24

Citation: 131 So. 178, 100 Fla. 1349

Snippet: R. 786; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. R. 72 and other cases of restrictive titles

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Love

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-02-14

Citation: 126 So. 374, 99 Fla. 333

Snippet: R. 290; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. R. 72; Ex Parte Knight and Knight, 52 Fla.

Amos v. Mathews

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-01-23

Citation: 126 So. 308, 99 Fla. 1

Snippet: school fund." Wade v. Atlantic Lbr. Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. R. 72. It necessarily follows that by Chap

Volusia County v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-12-30

Citation: 125 So. 813, 98 Fla. 1166, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1397

Snippet: control. Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. R. 72. In that case, the journals of the two

Apgar v. Wilkinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-03-13

Citation: 116 So. 78, 95 Fla. 457

Snippet: 290; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Company, 51 Fla. 628, 41 So.2d 72; Disston v. Trustees of Internal Improvement

Smith v. Chase

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-05

Citation: 91 Fla. 1044

Snippet: *1051Fla. 736; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 South. Rep. 72. Provisions that are necessary incidents

Smith v. Chase

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-05

Citation: 111 So. 891, 91 Fla. 1047

Snippet: Fla. 736; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628,41 South. Rep. 72. Provisions that are necessary incidents

State Ex Rel. Buford v. Carley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-04-15

Citation: 104 So. 577, 89 Fla. 361

Snippet: Rep. 767; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 South. Rep. 72; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51

State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of Equalizers

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-11-20

Citation: 84 Fla. 592

Snippet: The case of Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 South. Rep. 72; Disston v. Board of Trustees of

Davis v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-07-06

Citation: 84 Fla. 102, 92 So. 916

Snippet: Fla. 736; Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 South. Rep. 72.