CopyCited 1 times | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
...damages
sustained by reason of such restraining order . . . .”); §
556.106(1), Fla. Stat.
(2022) (“There is no liability on the part of, and no cause of action of any nature
shall arise against, the board members of the corporation . . . .”); §
631.918, Fla.
Stat....
...a negative conditional
statement (“unless”), does not convince us that these sub-provisions are
not exceptions to the general rule of immunity which is clearly expressed
at Subsection 18’s outset.
This sort of construction is not unique. Section 631.918 follows a
similar pattern, providing that “there is no liability” for certain things
“unless such action is found to be a violation of antitrust laws, was in bad
faith, or was undertaken with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting
wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.”
§ 631.918, Fla....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida
...This stands in
- 10 -
contrast with statutes that expressly confer some form of immunity.
See, e.g., §
397.6775, Fla. Stat. (2024) (law enforcement immunity);
§
560.116, Fla. Stat. (2024) (money services business immunity);
§
631.918, Fla....
