Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 636.029 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 636.029 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 636.029

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 636
PREPAID LIMITED HEALTH SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS AND DISCOUNT PLAN ORGANIZATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 636.029
636.029 Construction and relationship with other laws.
(1) No other provision of the insurance code applies to a prepaid limited health service organization unless such an organization is specifically mentioned therein.
(2) Except as provided in this act, the insurance code does not apply to prepaid limited health service organizations certificated under this act. Any person, entity, or prepaid limited health service organization operating without a subsisting certificate of authority in violation of this act or rules adopted thereunder, in addition to being subject to the provisions of this act, is subject to the provisions of the insurance code.
(3) The department and office are vested with all powers granted to them under the insurance code with respect to the investigation of any violation of this act within their respective regulatory jurisdictions.
History.s. 24, ch. 93-148; s. 1533, ch. 2003-261; s. 131, ch. 2004-5.

F.S. 636.029 on Google Scholar

F.S. 636.029 on Casetext

Amendments to 636.029


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 636.029
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 636.029.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 636.029

Total Results: 7

Wood v. Wood

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-07-30

Citation: 166 So. 2d 627, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4010

Snippet: is-not maintainable. Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625 (1947).”2 Though the Rambo case specifically

Rambo v. Rambo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-08-01

Citation: 155 So. 2d 817

Snippet: is not maintainable. Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625 (1947). In Egland v. Egland, 92 So.2d

Stone v. Stone

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-03-05

Citation: 151 So. 2d 301, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3516

Snippet: Supreme Court so held in Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625; and this Court held similarly in Perry

Poerschke v. Poerschke

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-08-11

Citation: 114 So. 2d 30

Snippet: App.1957, 97 So.2d 152; Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625. There is no evidence in the record that

Perry v. Perry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-09-26

Citation: 97 So. 2d 152

Snippet: expressed in the case of Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625, 626, appears to be controlling in this

Egland v. Egland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-02-13

Citation: 92 So. 2d 647

Snippet: or minor children. In Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625, 626, in considering an action under

Pawley v. Pawley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1950-04-06

Citation: 46 So. 2d 464, 28 A.L.R. 2d 1358, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 908

Snippet: been a Cuban divorce. Close v. Close, 158 Fla. 636, 29 So.2d 625; Nelson v. State ex-rel. Quigg, 156 Fla