Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 636.053 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 636.053 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 636.053

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 636
PREPAID LIMITED HEALTH SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS AND DISCOUNT PLAN ORGANIZATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 636.053
636.053 Injunction.In addition to the penalties and other enforcement provisions of this act, the office and department, subject to their respective jurisdiction, are vested with the power to seek both temporary and permanent injunctive relief when:
(1) A prepaid limited health service organization is being operated by any person or entity without a subsisting certificate of authority.
(2) Any person, entity, or prepaid limited health service organization has engaged in any activity prohibited by this act or any rule adopted pursuant thereto.
(3) Any prepaid limited health service organization, person, or entity is renewing, issuing, or delivering a prepaid limited health services contract without a subsisting certificate of authority.

The office’s or department’s authority to seek injunctive relief is not conditioned on having conducted any proceeding pursuant to chapter 120.

History.s. 42, ch. 93-148; s. 11, ch. 97-93; s. 1545, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 636.053 on Google Scholar

F.S. 636.053 on Casetext

Amendments to 636.053


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 636.053
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 636.053.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 636.053

Total Results: 3

DeWitt v. Duce

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-23

Citation: 408 So. 2d 216

Snippet: influence claim. Brignati v. Medenwald, 315 Mass. 636, 53 N.E.2d 673 (1944). The rule is that if adequate

Royal v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-12-12

Citation: 170 So. 450, 127 Fla. 320

Snippet: 523, 1 L.R.A. 327; Beck v. Ulrich, 13 Pa. St. 636, 53 Am. Dec. 507; Note 125 A.S.R. 847. In this case

Bear v. Standard Accident Insurance

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-02-19

Citation: 168 So. 18, 124 Fla. 9, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1060

Snippet: Court may be concerned. Beck v. Uhrich, 13 Pa. It. 636, 53 Am. Dec. 507. Applying the foregoing consideration