Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 667.005 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 667.005 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 667.005

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVIII
BANKS AND BANKING
Chapter 667
SAVINGS BANKS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 667.005
667.005 Reorganization, merger, or consolidation with a foreign savings bank.
(1) A savings bank shall have the power to reorganize, merge, or consolidate with a foreign savings bank, as defined in s. 667.013, subject to the approval of the office.
(2) If the resulting or surviving savings bank is to be a foreign savings bank, the office shall not approve the proposed transaction unless:
(a) The laws of the state in which the foreign savings bank has its principal place of business permit savings banks in that state to reorganize, merge, or consolidate with Florida savings banks in transactions in which the resulting or surviving savings bank is a Florida savings bank.
(b) The constituent Florida savings bank has been in existence and continuously operating for more than 2 years.
(3) A proposed transaction in which the resulting or surviving savings bank is to be a foreign savings bank shall be subject to any conditions, restrictions, and requirements that would apply in the state where the foreign savings bank has its principal place of business if the resulting or surviving savings bank were to be a Florida savings bank, which conditions, restrictions, and requirements would not apply to a reorganization, merger, or consolidation of savings banks all of which are located in that state.
(4) A foreign savings bank which is the resulting or surviving savings bank in a reorganization, merger, or consolidation with a Florida savings bank shall not be considered a Florida savings bank.
(5) Each application for reorganization, merger, or consolidation with a foreign savings bank shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee as provided in s. 658.73(2)(g).
History.s. 15, ch. 97-30; s. 1867, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 667.005 on Google Scholar

F.S. 667.005 on Casetext

Amendments to 667.005


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 667.005
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 667.005.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 667.005

Total Results: 6

Bradley v. Brotman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-02-19

Citation: 836 So. 2d 1129, 2003 WL 354873

Snippet: alleging that the conversation violated section 455.667(5), Florida Statutes (1999), which prevents any ex

Humana Medical Plan, Inc. v. Fischman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-12-22

Citation: 750 So. 2d 677, 1999 WL 1243873

Snippet: patient authorization, apply. See Fla. Stat. § 455.667(5) (1997). Accordingly, we hold that, under either

State v. Viatical Services, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-08-04

Citation: 741 So. 2d 560, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10478, 1999 WL 565896

Snippet: disclosing patient records without consent, section 455.667(5)(c), which prohibits health care practitioners from

Figaro v. Bacon-Green

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-16

Citation: 734 So. 2d 579, 1999 WL 391582

Snippet: Contact, contrary to the provisions of section 455.667(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), which mandates that

Cooper v. Lewis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-09-25

Citation: 719 So. 2d 944, 1998 WL 654092

Snippet: discovery of these reports. Indeed, subsections 455.667(5) and (6) prohibit the discovery of confidential

Kenilworth Ins. Co. v. Drake

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-10

Citation: 396 So. 2d 836

Snippet: Midwest Mutual v. Santiesteban, 287 So.2d 665, 667[5] (Fla. 1974). Further, once a proper case for declaratory