Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 672.201 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 672.201 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 672.201

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 672.201
672.201 Formal requirements; statute of frauds.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his or her authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.
(2) Between merchants if within a reasonable time a writing in confirmation of the contract and sufficient against the sender is received and the party receiving it has reason to know its contents, it satisfies the requirements of subsection (1) against such party unless written notice of objection to its contents is given within 10 days after it is received.
(3) A contract which does not satisfy the requirements of subsection (1) but which is valid in other respects is enforceable:
(a) If the goods are to be specially manufactured for the buyer and are not suitable for sale to others in the ordinary course of the seller’s business and the seller, before notice of repudiation is received and under circumstances which reasonably indicate that the goods are for the buyer, has made either a substantial beginning of their manufacture or commitments for their procurement; or
(b) If the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in his or her pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a contract for sale was made, but the contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or
(c) With respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted (s. 672.606).
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 557, ch. 97-102.
Note.s. 2-201, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.201 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.201 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.201


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.201
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.201.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.201

Total Results: 20

Tm Wireless Communication Services v. All Commerce

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-16

Citation: 246 So. 3d 541

Snippet: induce TM Wireless to buy the telephones. See § 672.201(1), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“[A] contract for the sale

B & C Investors, Inc. v. Vojak

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-08-10

Citation: 79 So. 3d 42, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 2011 WL 3477163

Snippet: tort action.” See id. at 1289 (citing section 672.201(1), Florida Statutes, for the proposition that

Ge Lin v. Ecclestone Signature Homes of Palm Beach, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-13

Citation: 59 So. 3d 267, 74 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5206, 2011 WL 1376686

Snippet: writing, violating the statute of frauds, section 672.201, Florida Statutes, which required that the sale

Technical Packaging, Inc. v. Hanchett

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-26

Citation: 992 So. 2d 309, 2008 WL 4366038

Snippet: of the Uniform Commercial Code. See generally § 672.201, Fla. Stat. (2002); 45 Fla. Jur.2d Sales and Exchanges

HPBC, INC. v. Nor-Tech Powerboats, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-08

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1108, 2006 WL 3524019

Snippet: authorized. Florida's Uniform Commercial Code, section 672.201(1), Florida Statutes (2005), provides: Except as

American Zurich Insurance Co. v. St. George Crystal, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-26

Citation: 870 So. 2d 243, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882

Snippet: was a contract for the sale of goods, section 672.201, Florida Statutes (1997), the statute of frauds

OFFICE PAVILION SO. FLA. v. ASAL Products, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-05-21

Citation: 849 So. 2d 367, 2003 WL 21180126

Snippet: adopted from the Uniform Commercial Code. Section 672.201(1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that a contract

Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-09-13

Citation: 827 So. 2d 318, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13214, 2002 WL 31039451

Snippet: GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 672.201, Fla. Stat. (1996). [2] § 672.206, Fla. Stat.

Harris v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-11-17

Citation: 746 So. 2d 1152, 1999 WL 1037950

Snippet: not apply to contracts for the sale of goods (s.672.201) nor of securities (s.678.319) nor to security

Coleman Co. v. Cargil International Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-09

Citation: 731 So. 2d 2, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15513

Snippet: unenforceable pursuant to the statute of frauds. See §§ 672.201(1), 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1995). See also Yates v

Centro Nautico v. INTERN. MARINE CO-OP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-14

Citation: 719 So. 2d 967

Snippet: legal theory supports this award. UCC section 672.201 limits enforcement of oral contracts captured by

Advanced Mobilehome Systems of Tampa, Inc. v. Alumax Fabricated Products, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-11-08

Citation: 666 So. 2d 166, 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 91, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11675

Snippet: therefore, the written terms governed under sections 672.201(2) and 672.207(2), Florida Statutes (1991). Our

ADV. MOBILEHOME SYS. v. Alumax

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-11-08

Citation: 666 So. 2d 166

Snippet: therefore, the written terms governed under sections 672.201(2) and 672.207(2), Florida Statutes (1991). Our

Mettler, Inc. v. Ellen Tracy, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-12-30

Citation: 648 So. 2d 253, 1994 WL 717899

Snippet: used to memorialize such a sale of goods. See §§ 672.201-.210, Fla. Stat. (1991). Nevertheless, the second

Stewart v. J.P. Mach Agri-Marketing, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-08-26

Citation: 641 So. 2d 202, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8453, 1994 WL 460261

Snippet: issue of applicability of sections 672.-209 and 672.201, Florida Statutes, was not raised before the hearing

Spaziani v. Bancroft

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-04-23

Citation: 618 So. 2d 744, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4515, 1993 WL 125160

Snippet: the party to be charged. 19A F.S.A. p. 121, § 672.201 UCC cmt. 1 (1978). The comment to the general definition

Khoshnou v. PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON ETC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-05-19

Citation: 525 So. 2d 977, 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 187, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1217, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2071

Snippet: and that it is to be interpreted like section 672.201(2), the Statute of Frauds provision regarding sale

J.R. Sales, Inc. v. Dicks

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-10

Citation: 521 So. 2d 366, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 655, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1058, 1988 WL 20645

Snippet: exceptions to the writing requirement. Section 672.201(3), Florida Statutes (1985); Lea Industries, Inc

Al Booth's, Inc. v. Boyd-Scarp Enterprises Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-01-07

Citation: 518 So. 2d 422, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 25, 1988 WL 205

Snippet: statute of frauds found in the U.C.C., section 672.201, Florida Statutes (1985), is not a defense here

CENTRAL FLA. ANTENNA SERVICE v. Crabtree

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-03-12

Citation: 503 So. 2d 1351, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 754, 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1397, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12037

Snippet: 2d 989 (Fla. 1983). [6] §§ 672.102, 672.206, 672.201(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). [7] § 672.606(1), Fla.