Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 672.710 (2025)

Seller’s incidental damages.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

672.710 Seller’s incidental damages.—Incidental damages to an aggrieved seller include any commercially reasonable charges, expenses or commissions incurred in stopping delivery, in the transportation, care and custody of goods after the buyer’s breach, in connection with return or resale of the goods or otherwise resulting from the breach.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-710, U.C.C.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1976–2003 · leading case: Future Tech Int'l, Inc. v. Tae Il Media, Ltd., 944 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Fla. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Future Tech Int'l, Inc. v. Tae Il Media, Ltd., 944 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Fla. 1996). “failed to pay Tae II Media the price of the equipment as it became due, thereby entitling Tae II Media to recover from Future Tech damages in the principal amount of the price of the equipment, incidental damages incurred in shipping delivery, and in the transportation, care and…”

Fla. Nat. Bk. v. Alfred, Ann Goldstein Found., Inc., 327 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). · cites it 2× “115 and F.S. 672.710 afforded a basis for the award of attorneys' fees although no provision therefor is found in the letter of credit the dishonor of which resulted in the litigation.”

Al's Motor Co. v. Jackson Marine Sales, Inc., 432 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). “Section 672.710 provides: Seller’s incidental damages.”

Florida Recycling Servs., Inc. v. Petersen Indus., Inc., 858 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). · cites it 4× “Also, as provided in section 672.710, Petersen claimed ,180.”

Macneil v. Disc. Grocery & Things, Inc., 34 Fla. Supp. 2d 85 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988). “Florida Statute § 672.710 (1987) provides for incidental damages that when added to other applicable damages could have exceeded the County Court jurisdictional limits of ,000.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.