Florida Statute 672.714 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.714

672.714 Buyer’s damages for breach in regard to accepted goods.—

(1) Where the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (s. 672.607(3)) he or she may recover as damages for any nonconformity of tender the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from the seller’s breach as determined in any manner which is reasonable.

(2) The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.

(3) In a proper case any incidental and consequential damages under the next section may also be recovered.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 609, ch. 97-102.

Note.—s. 2-714, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.714 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.714 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.714

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.714

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.714.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.714

Total Results: 20

KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. v. KHRISTOPHER DOUGHTY & KATARZYNA DZIEWIECIEN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-14

Citation: 242 So. 3d 1172

Snippet: consequential damages resulting from the breach. See § 672.714(2), (3), Fla. Stat. (2014); Bill Branch Chevrolet

Magnum Construction Management Corp., Etc. v. City of Miami Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-14

Citation: 209 So. 3d 51, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18359

Snippet: the trial court defined as betterments. See §§ 672.714, 672.715, Fla. Stat. (2010); Miles v. Kavanaugh

Paul Gottlieb & Co. v. Alps South Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-12-21

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1, 64 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 939, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20245, 2007 WL 4462984

Snippet: precluded from receiving consequential damages. See § 672.714-.715. Comment (a) of the Restatement of Contracts

Skyline Computer Corp. v. Encore Computer Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-08

Citation: 699 So. 2d 1048, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 1997 WL 614431

Snippet: whether damages are recoverable under sections 672.714 and 672.715, Florida -Statutes (1995), when a limited

Halliburton Co. v. Eastern Cement Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-13

Citation: 672 So. 2d 844, 1996 WL 93682

Snippet: case may be an amalgam of some or all three. §§ 672.714 and 672.715, Fla.Stat. (1995); see also Hadley

Koplowitz v. Girard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-09

Citation: 658 So. 2d 1183, 1995 WL 467828

Snippet: Kavanaugh, 350 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla. Stat. (1993). In Storchwerke

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-11

Citation: 610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

Snippet: consequential damages for breach of warranty. §§ 672.714-.715, Fla. Stat. (1987) (UCC §§ 2-714 to -715)

BP Dev. & Mgmt. Corp. v. P. LAFER ENT., INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-02

Citation: 538 So. 2d 1379, 1989 WL 16644

Snippet: 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). See §§ 672.313, 672.608, 672.714, and 672.717, Fla. Stat. (1985). Here B.P. moved

Hikes v. McNamara Pontiac, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-08-13

Citation: 510 So. 2d 1212, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1996, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9884

Snippet: codified in the Uniform Commercial Code as sections 672.714(1) and (2), Florida Statutes, the latter subsection

Parsons v. Motor Homes of America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-07

Citation: 465 So. 2d 1285, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 576

Snippet: for breach in regard to accepted goods Section 672.714. We find that the Parsons were not foreclosed from

Channing v. Colonial Press of Miami, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-10-16

Citation: 457 So. 2d 588, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15556

Snippet: thus affecting their value pursuant to Section 672.714(2), Florida Statutes (1983).

Cedars of Lebanon Hosp. Corp. v. European X-Ray Distributors

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-01-24

Citation: 444 So. 2d 1068, 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 40, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11531

Snippet: and 672.315, Florida Statutes 1981). Sections 672.714 and 672.715 provide the measure of damages for

Pennington Grain and Seed, Inc. v. Tuten

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-11-09

Citation: 422 So. 2d 948, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 458

Snippet: provided by the Uniform Commercial Code in Sections 672.714 or 672.715. Because the appellant has not demonstrated

Lawson v. Turner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-10-14

Citation: 404 So. 2d 424, 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 744

Snippet: implied warranty of title are set forth in Section 672.714(2) and (3), Florida Statutes (1973). Bill Branch

ADAM METAL SUPPLY v. Electrodex, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-09-03

Citation: 386 So. 2d 1316, 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 178

Snippet: Florida Statutes (1979). Consequently, under Section 672.714, Florida Statutes (1979), it was entitled to damages

Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc. v. Redmond

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-01-04

Citation: 378 So. 2d 319, 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 56, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15413

Snippet: had been as warranted," with good title. Section 672.714(2), Fla. Stat. (1977). Additionally, appellee was

Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. v. Conley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-06-19

Citation: 372 So. 2d 965, 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 860, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15390

Snippet: 2-714 of the Uniform Commercial Code [Section 672.714, Florida Statutes]. "10. Plaintiff's damages are

Estate of Harper v. ORLANDO FUN. HOME, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-01-09

Citation: 366 So. 2d 126

Snippet: thereto. (See F.S. 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). Affirmed in part and reversed

Miles v. Kavanaugh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-09-27

Citation: 350 So. 2d 1090, 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 911

Snippet: proximately caused by the breach of warranty. Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council

US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. N. Am. Steel Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-07

Citation: 335 So. 2d 18

Snippet: or be barred from any remedy; and * * * * * * "672.714 Buyer's damages for breach in regard to accepted