Florida Statute 672.715 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.715

672.715 Buyer’s incidental and consequential damages.—

(1) Incidental damages resulting from the seller’s breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, transportation and care and custody of goods rightfully rejected, any commercially reasonable charges, expenses or commissions in connection with effecting cover and any other reasonable expense incident to the delay or other breach.

(2) Consequential damages resulting from the seller’s breach include:

(a) Any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise; and

(b) Injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-715, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.715 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.715 on CourtListener

Amendments to 672.715

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.715

Total Results: 18

Cooper v. Meridian Yachts, Ltd.

575 F.3d 1151, 2009 A.M.C. 2652, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16604, 2009 WL 2146388

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 21, 2009 | Docket: 399452

Cited 60 times | Published

resulting from any breach of warranty." Fla. Stat. § 672.715(2). Meridian's third-party claims against De Vries

HGI Associates, Inc. v. Wetmore Printing Co.

427 F.3d 867, 59 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1070, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21427, 2005 WL 2428459

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 4, 2005 | Docket: 48119

Cited 39 times | Published

only pled lost profit damages under Fla. Stat. § 672.715(2). The parties do not dispute this decision on

B. Anders Nyquist and Harriet Nyquist v. Dale Randall, Donald Berry, Janet Melear, Etc.

819 F.2d 1014, 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1823, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7774

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 1987 | Docket: 882912

Cited 15 times | Published

absence of “cover.” See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.715(2)(a) (West 1966). Additionally, defendants complained

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1992 | Docket: 1413155

Cited 10 times | Published

to an award of consequential damages under section 672.715(2)(a), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, those

Premix-Marbletite Manufacturing Corp. v. SKW Chemicals, Inc.

145 F. Supp. 2d 1348, 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 77, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7809, 2001 WL 673454

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2001 | Docket: 388925

Cited 9 times | Published

consequential damages pursuant to UCC § 2-715, Fla. Stat. § 672.715. The parties are advised to prepare their presentations

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

414 So. 2d 1105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1982 | Docket: 1707006

Cited 9 times | Published

"proximately resulting from any breach of warranty." Section 672.715(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.715(2)(b))

Eastern Cement v. Halliburton Co.

600 So. 2d 469, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4094, 1992 WL 68968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1992 | Docket: 2519976

Cited 8 times | Published

315, Fla. Stat. (1989). Additionally, under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover

Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Inc. v. Hai Yun Musical Instruments Manufacture Co.

142 F. Supp. 3d 1245, 93 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 40, 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 41, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150398, 2015 WL 6750813

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2015 | Docket: 64305140

Cited 7 times | Published

incident to the delay or other- breach.” Fla. Stat. § 672.715(1). Armadillo alleges that it is entitled to the

Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc. v. Redmond

378 So. 2d 319, 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 56, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1980 | Docket: 1794747

Cited 7 times | Published

reasonable expense incident to the ... breach." Section 672.715(1), Fla. Stat. (1977). See Council Brothers

Paul Gottlieb & Co. v. Alps South Corp.

985 So. 2d 1, 64 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 939, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20245, 2007 WL 4462984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2007 | Docket: 1673467

Cited 6 times | Published

expense incident to the delay or other breach." § 672.715(1). Therefore, the trial court may award Alps

Halliburton Co. v. Eastern Cement Corp.

672 So. 2d 844, 1996 WL 93682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1996 | Docket: 1764142

Cited 6 times | Published

merchantability. Having so decided, we added: "under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover

Estate of Harper v. ORLANDO FUN. HOME, INC.

366 So. 2d 126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1979 | Docket: 1655630

Cited 6 times | Published

F.S. 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). Affirmed in part and reversed in part, and

Bair v. AEGIS CORP.

523 So. 2d 1186, 1988 WL 24165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1988 | Docket: 472745

Cited 5 times | Published

rejected them." Under the remedy provision section 672.715(1) Bair is entitled to recover incidental damages

Nature's Products, Inc. v. Natrol, Inc.

990 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 2013 WL 7738172

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2013 | Docket: 65996626

Cited 2 times | Published

recovery is precluded under Florida Statutes § 672.715 (defining consequential damages), the Eleventh

Sav-A-Stop Inc. v. Mayfair Super Markets, Inc. (In Re Sav-A-Stop Inc.)

119 B.R. 317, 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 484, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2022, 1990 WL 138991

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1990 | Docket: 1070951

Cited 1 times | Published

consequential and incidental damages under § 672.715. Section 672.715(2) defines consequential damages as "any

Fryatt v. Lantana One, Ltd.

866 So. 2d 158, 2004 WL 305719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2004 | Docket: 1680248

Published

and unavoidable loss resulting from the breach. § 672.715(1),(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). Here, however, the

Gatsby Spas, Inc. v. Douglass Screen Printers, Inc.

613 So. 2d 568, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 1993 WL 25619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1993 | Docket: 64693990

Published

breach of contract and breach of warranty.” See section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1991). Accordingly, we grant

Pan American Stone Co. v. Meister

527 So. 2d 275, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1413, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513, 1988 WL 59436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1988 | Docket: 64635634

Published

proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.” § 672.715(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We reverse and remand for