The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . See §§ 672.714, 672.715, Fla. Stat. (2010); Miles v. . . .
. . . . §§ 672.714 and 672.715. . . . Stat. §§ 672.714 and 672.715; Halliburton Co. v. . . . Stat. § 672.715(1). . . . Stat. § 672.715(2). In Nyquist v. . . . Randall, 819 F.2d 1014 (11th Cir.1987) the Eleventh Circuit interpreted § 672.715(2) to mean that (1) . . .
. . . Rather, NPI has conflated those claims, arguing only that recovery is precluded under Florida Statutes § 672.715 . . . Stat. § 672.715). . . . Florida Statutes § 672.715 defines "consequential damages" under Florida law, providing, in relevant . . .
. . . the contract price together with any incidental or consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s.672.715 . . . the contract price together with any incidental and consequential damages provided in this chapter (s.672.715 . . .
. . . Stat. section 672.715(1), a buyer is entitled to recover incidental and consequential damages including . . .
. . . . § 672.715(2). . . .
. . . .” § 672.715(1). Therefore, the trial court may award Alps its direct and incidental damages. . . .
. . . . § 672.715(2). . . . Stat. § 672.715. . . . Stat. § 672.715(2)(a). . . . Lost profits typically fall under the category of consequential damages and we have applied § 672.715 . . . According to § 672.715(2)(a), we must limit HGI’s lost profits recovery unless it could not reasonably . . .
. . . . § 672.715(1),(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . See § 672.715(1),(2), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 672.715. . . .
. . . reason, we do not reach the question of whether damages are recoverable under sections 672.714 and 672.715 . . .
. . . Having so decided, we added: “under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover both . . . consequential damages, which in a proper case may be an amalgam of some or all three. §§ 672.714 and 672.715 . . . otherwise; and (b) injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.” § 672.715 . . . The claimed loss clearly would not constitute “incidental” damages under section 672.715(1). . . . injury to person or property proximately resulting from [the] breach of warranty” permitted by section 672.715 . . .
. . . Kavanaugh, 350 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . See section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1991). . . .
. . . of acceptance was not proved, he is not entitled to an award of consequential damages under section 672.715 . . .
. . . Additionally, under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover both incidental and . . .
. . . the contract price together with any incidental or consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s. 672.715 . . . contract price together with any incidental and any consequential damages provided in this chapter (§ 672.715 . . . Both sections provide the opportunity to seek consequential and incidental damages under § 672.715. . . . Section 672.715(2) defines consequential damages as “any loss resulting from general or particular requirements . . . Section 672.715(2). Mayfair has not established this evidence. . . .
. . . aggrieved buyer may recover consequential damages for a seller’s breach of contract (sections 672.713-672.715 . . .
. . . .” § 672.715(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We reverse and remand for a new trial on all issues. . . .
. . . .” § 672.715(2)(a) Fla. Stat. (1987). . . . Comment 6 to § 672.715 provides as follows: In the case of sale of wares to one in he business of reselling . . .
. . . Under the remedy provision section 672.715(1) Bair is entitled to recover incidental damages which “include . . . 7 Kan.App.2d 676, 647 P.2d 820 (1982) (applying the same U.C.C. provision as adopted under section 672.715 . . . Pursuant to section 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1985), consequential damages include: (a) Any loss . . .
. . . . § 672.715(2)(a) (West 1966). . . . Such damages are properly covered by section 672.715, which states that "consequential damages ... include . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.715 precludes recovery of consequential damages only where the loss could “reasonably . . . Section 672.715 specifically refers to losses that could not be avoided “by cover or otherwise." . . . Rather, they sought damages for non-conformity as provided in §~ 672.714 and 672.715. . . .
. . . Sections 672.714 and 672.715 provide the measure of damages for the breach of these warranties. . . .
. . . or limited damages to less than that provided by the Uniform Commercial Code in Sections 672.714 or 672.715 . . .
. . . Section 672.715(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.715(2)(b)). . . .
. . . the contract price together with any incidental or consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s. 672.715 . . .
. . . Section 672.715(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). See Council Brothers, Inc. v. . . .
. . . (See F.S. 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). . . .
. . . Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council Bros., Inc. v. . . .