Florida Statute 672.715 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.715

672.715 Buyer’s incidental and consequential damages.—

(1) Incidental damages resulting from the seller’s breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, transportation and care and custody of goods rightfully rejected, any commercially reasonable charges, expenses or commissions in connection with effecting cover and any other reasonable expense incident to the delay or other breach.

(2) Consequential damages resulting from the seller’s breach include:

(a) Any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise; and

(b) Injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-715, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.715 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.715 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.715

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.715

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.715.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.715

Total Results: 19

Magnum Construction Management Corp., Etc. v. City of Miami Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-14

Citation: 209 So. 3d 51, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18359

Snippet: court defined as betterments. See §§ 672.714, 672.715, Fla. Stat. (2010); Miles v. Kavanaugh, 350 So

Paul Gottlieb & Co. v. Alps South Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-12-21

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1, 64 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 939, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20245, 2007 WL 4462984

Snippet: expense incident to the delay or other breach." § 672.715(1). Therefore, the trial court may award Alps its

Fryatt v. Lantana One, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-02-19

Citation: 866 So. 2d 158, 2004 WL 305719

Snippet: unavoidable loss resulting from the breach. § 672.715(1),(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). Here, however, the trial

Skyline Computer Corp. v. Encore Computer Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-08

Citation: 699 So. 2d 1048, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 1997 WL 614431

Snippet: damages are recoverable under sections 672.714 and 672.715, Florida -Statutes (1995), when a limited warranty

Halliburton Co. v. Eastern Cement Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-13

Citation: 672 So. 2d 844, 1996 WL 93682

Snippet: merchantability. Having so decided, we added: "under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover

Koplowitz v. Girard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-09

Citation: 658 So. 2d 1183, 1995 WL 467828

Snippet: So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla. Stat. (1993). In Storchwerke, Gmbh v. Mr

Gatsby Spas, Inc. v. Douglass Screen Printers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-02-05

Citation: 613 So. 2d 568, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 1993 WL 25619

Snippet: contract and breach of warranty.” See section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1991). Accordingly, we grant

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-11

Citation: 610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

Snippet: an award of consequential damages under section 672.715(2)(a), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, those portions

Eastern Cement v. Halliburton Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-04-08

Citation: 600 So. 2d 469, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4094, 1992 WL 68968

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (1989). Additionally, under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover

Florida Min. & Materials Corp. v. Standard Gypsum Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-08-23

Citation: 550 So. 2d 47, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1245, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2003, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4782, 1989 WL 98054

Snippet: seller's breach of contract (sections 672.713-672.715), an aggrieved seller is limited to recovering

Pan American Stone Co. v. Meister

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-06-15

Citation: 527 So. 2d 275, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1413, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513, 1988 WL 59436

Snippet: proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.” § 672.715(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We reverse and remand for

Bair v. AEGIS CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-23

Citation: 523 So. 2d 1186, 1988 WL 24165

Snippet: rejected them." Under the remedy provision section 672.715(1) Bair is entitled to recover incidental damages

Cedars of Lebanon Hosp. Corp. v. European X-Ray Distributors

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-01-24

Citation: 444 So. 2d 1068, 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 40, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11531

Snippet: Florida Statutes 1981). Sections 672.714 and 672.715 provide the measure of damages for the breach of

Pennington Grain and Seed, Inc. v. Tuten

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-11-09

Citation: 422 So. 2d 948, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 458

Snippet: Uniform Commercial Code in Sections 672.714 or 672.715. Because the appellant has not demonstrated that

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-28

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1105

Snippet: resulting from any breach of warranty." Section 672.715(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.715(2)(b))

Goodell v. KT Enterprises, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-10

Citation: 394 So. 2d 1087, 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 129, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599

Snippet: consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s. 672.715), but less expenses saved in consequence of the

Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc. v. Redmond

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-01-04

Citation: 378 So. 2d 319, 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 56, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15413

Snippet: reasonable expense incident to the ... breach." Section 672.715(1), Fla. Stat. (1977). See Council Brothers, Inc

Estate of Harper v. ORLANDO FUN. HOME, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-01-09

Citation: 366 So. 2d 126

Snippet: 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). Affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded

Miles v. Kavanaugh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-09-27

Citation: 350 So. 2d 1090, 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 911

Snippet: by the breach of warranty. Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council Bros., Inc