Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 673.3011 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 673.3011 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 673.3011

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 673
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 673.3011
673.3011 Person entitled to enforce instrument.The term “person entitled to enforce” an instrument means:
(1) The holder of the instrument;
(2) A nonholder in possession of the instrument who has the rights of a holder; or
(3) A person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 or s. 673.4181(4).

A person may be a person entitled to enforce the instrument even though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument.

History.s. 2, ch. 92-82.

F.S. 673.3011 on Google Scholar

F.S. 673.3011 on Casetext

Amendments to 673.3011


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 673.3011
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 673.3011.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GROSSO a k a L. v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A. AS TRUSTEE OF ACE SECURITIES CORP., 275 So. 3d 642 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2018). . . .

HANNA, v. PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC T. n k a s n k a n k a By, s To Be An As, 270 So. 3d 403 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . negotiable, the bank could not establish its standing as the holder of the instrument pursuant to section 673.3011 . . . HSBC Bank USA , 157 So.3d 355, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (recognizing that pursuant to section 673.3011 . . .

HELIX INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LP, v. PRIVILEGE DIRECT CORP., 364 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . . § 673.3011. . . .

L. MIELKE C. v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST, 264 So. 3d 249 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . This interpretation is bolstered by the language of section 673.3011, Florida Statutes. . . . ." § 673.3011(3), Fla. Stat. . . . Accordingly, sections 673.3011 and 673.3091 make clear that the right to enforce a lost note, in the . . . Pursuant to section 673.3011, Deutsche Bank had to demonstrate that it was the proper holder of the note . . . that it complied with section 673.3091 to show that it was the holder of the note pursuant to section 673.3011 . . .

MAKI v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,, 257 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . original plaintiff-failed to present legally sufficient evidence that it had standing under section 673.3011 . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ASSETS TRUST v. F. NOLL, III,, 261 So. 3d 656 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . original note secured by the mortgage and [was] entitled to foreclosure pursuant to Florida Statute 673.3011 . . . entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument such as the promissory note at issue in this appeal. § 673.3011 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK N. A. v. DIZ,, 253 So. 3d 705 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2013), negotiable instruments may be enforced by a holder, . . .

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, N. A. v. JOHNSON a k a L. a k a a k a n k a, 250 So. 3d 808 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a CWALT, v. BURGIEL, s At LLC,, 248 So. 3d 237 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. T. BUSET,, 241 So. 3d 882 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 673.3011. . . . endorsed in blank with Appellant's name stamped in the blank endorsement field, which, paired with section 673.3011 . . .

D. FIELDING, v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 239 So. 3d 140 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

SABIDO v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a JP L N. A., 241 So. 3d 865 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2016). Here, the original lender was Washington Mutual Bank. . . .

T. WISMAN, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 239 So. 3d 726 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . Mellon, 165 So.3d 44, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (citing § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013) ). . . .

HSBC BANK USA, v. HESS a k a H. a k a a k a III,, 228 So. 3d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2016) (emphasis added). . . .

M. RIGBY, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f k a FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWMBS, INC., 228 So. 3d 183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Accordingly, BONY’s status as a holder or other person entitled to enforce the note, pursuant to section 673.3011 . . .

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, v. RAFAELI PNC N. A., 225 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

A. FORERO L. v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,, 223 So. 3d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .; see also §§ 671.201(21), 673.3011, Fla. Stat. . . .

J. WINCHEL, v. PENNYMAC CORP. s n k a n k a, 222 So. 3d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 673.3011, Fla. . . . See § 673.3011(1), (2); Creadon v. U.S. Bank N.A., 166 So.3d 952, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). . . .

VERIZZO, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a N. A., 220 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); see, e.g., Russell v. . . . specifically contended that it was a nonholder in possession with the rights of a holder under section 673.3011 . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f k a ON BEHALF OF REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST v. HEATH,, 219 So. 3d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. PIERRE, 215 So. 3d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . another entity may have been the owner of the Note has no bearing on JPMorgan’s status as holder. § 673.3011 . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. M. APPLEWHITE O., 213 So. 3d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

PENNYMAC CORP. v. T. FROST a k a, 214 So. 3d 686 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N. A. f k a N. A. v. FITZGERALD,, 215 So. 3d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . negotiated in favor of the [Bank] and the [Bank] never became the holder of the note under Florida Statute § 673.3011 . . .

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, H I v. LOUISSAINT,, 212 So. 3d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Mellon, 165 So.3d 44, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (citing § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013)). . . .

A. HOUK, v. PENNYMAC CORP., 210 So. 3d 726 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . PennyMac Corp. is entitled to enforce the mortgage and mortgage note pursuant to Florida Statutes § 673.3011 . . . Section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2012), addresses the question of how one may qualify as a person . . . affidavit undercut and contradicted the theory advanced in the complaint that it qualified under section 673.3011 . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, J. P. v. S. BECKER D., 211 So. 3d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . HSBC Bank USA, 157 So.3d 355, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (quoting § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013)). . . .

GARRISON, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., 233 F. Supp. 3d 1282 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . 673.5011; and (2) if Defendant cannot meet the requirements to enforce the Loan under Florida Statutes, §§ 673.3011 . . . Similarly, Plaintiff has cited no authority to support the proposition that Florida Statutes, §§ 673.3011 . . .

CITIBANK, N. A. v. OLSAK,, 208 So. 3d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So.3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also § 673.3011, Fla. . . .

RINCON, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., 206 So.3d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The requirement emanates from section 673.3011 of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in this state . . . See § 673.3011, Fla. . . . .”); see also § 673.3011(1), Fla. . . . complaint, U.S, Bank alleged that it was the holder of this note entitled to enforce it pursuant to section 673.3011 . . .

D. FRANKLIN, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. N. A., 202 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011(1) & (2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

K. WALTON, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, ABS I MSAC, 201 So. 3d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . in-dorsement; PSA not sufficient proof that trustee held indorsed note on date complaint filed); see also § 673.3011 . . .

M. POWERS L. v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A. C,, 202 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Bank National Association, 173 So.3d 1045, 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), stated: Under section 673.3011, Florida . . .

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, By,, 207 So.3d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Lippi, 78 So.3d 81 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); see also § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. . . .

LUIZ, v. LYNX ASSET SERVICES, LLC,, 198 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . §§ 673.3011, 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2016) (emphasis added). . . . See §§ 673.3011, 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

POAG, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,, 198 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2014), defines a person entitled to enforce an instrument as “(1) . . . instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 or s. 673.4181(4).” § 673.3011 . . .

ALS- RVC, LLC, v. K. D. GARVIN a k a a k a K., 201 So. 3d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . It alleged that it was entitled to enforce the note, pursuant to section 673.3011(1), Florida Statutes . . . the bank assigned the note and mortgage to Maxim, the bank met the holder requirements under section 673.3011 . . . though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument.” § 673.3011 . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. L. HAGSTROM R., 203 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 673.3011(1); Brindise v. U.S. . . . Cf. § 673.3011 (identifying the three categories of persons entitled to enforce a note); Rodriguez, 178 . . . See § 673.3011(1); Brindise, 183 So.3d at 1219. . . . Rodriguez, 178 So.3d at 66 (Conner, J., concurring); see § 673.3011; Snyder v. . . .

FLOYD, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., 194 So. 3d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2010), a person entitled to enforce h note and foreclose on . . .

T. FROST a k a v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, a FSB, JP s, 193 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Id, at 357-58 (citing § 673.3011(2), Fla. Stat.). . . . instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 or s. 673.4181(4).” § 673.3011 . . .

S. MAGALDI, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As WAMU, 199 So. 3d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

CRUZ M. v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, F. A., 199 So. 3d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 673.3011, ;Fla, Stat. (2014); see Mazine v. . . . though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument ” § 673.3011 . . . who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to sfeetion] 673.3091 or sfeetion] 673.4181(4).” § 673.3011 . . . “[N]othing in [section 673.3011] allows an ‘owner’ to enforce the note without possession, except where . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. OUSLEY a k a E. Jr., 212 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

IN RE ELOWITZ s, 550 B.R. 603 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011(1), (2). . . . Stat. § 673.3011(1), the .holder of the Note is entitled to enforce the Note. . . .

McCONNELL, v. CHASE,, 190 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat.. (2010). . . .

BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. v. A. NASH,, 200 So. 3d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2011), a person entitled to enforce the note and foreclose . . .

ROBELTO v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A., 194 So. 3d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, v. A. McFADYEN,, 194 So. 3d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . See § 673.3011(3), Fla., Stat. (2015). . . . See § 673.3011(1), Fla. . . . enforce the note at the time the original was lost, it satisfied all of the requirements of section 673.3011 . . . By contrast, as already set forth herein, this matter concerns application of section 673.3011(3) and . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. ALAQUA PROPERTY,, 190 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 673.3011(1), Fla. . . .

D. RINCON, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 196 So. 3d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2012), the holder of a note has standing to foreclose. . . . See § 673.3011. AFFIRMED. PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. . . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. F. MARCIANO,, 190 So. 3d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . So.3d 1106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), we explained: The requirements for standing are provided in section 673.3011 . . .

T. PHAN, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, 198 So. 3d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 673.3011(1), Fla. . . . constructive possession of the note and standing to file a complaint for foreclosure as a holder under section 673.3011 . . .

CARACCIA, v. U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 185 So. 3d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

ANGELINI S. v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A. As On ACE, 189 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. .(2015); Rodriguez, 178 So.3d at 67 (Conner, J., concurring). . . .

BRINDISE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 183 So. 3d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 673.3011(2), Fla. Stat. (2014); Creadon v. U.S. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 190 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2016)

. . . specificity the factual basis by which the claimant is a person entitled to enforce the note'under section 673.3011 . . . (name of non-holder).. who is not the holder but is entitled-to enforce the note under section 673.3011 . . . It is also designed to conform to section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2013), except that part of section . . . 673.3011, Florida Statutes, which defines a person entitled to enforce an instrument under section 673.3091 . . .

ELSMAN, v. HSBC BANK USA MLMI, 182 So. 3d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . This court has previously determined: Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2013), a person entitled . . .

MORRIS, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY HSI LLC,, 182 So. 3d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 673.3011(l)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

GONZALEZ v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L. P., 180 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The requirements for standing are provided in section 673.3011, Florida Statutes, (2009), as follows: . . . though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument. § 673.3011 . . . This argument would place GreenTree under subsection (1) of section 673.3011 because the statutes define . . .

P. SEIDLER C. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. N. A., 179 So. 3d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . its own entitlement to enforce the note on the date'of trial, under any of the provisions of section 673.3011 . . . thus Wells Fargo’s, entitlement to reestablish' a lost note and then enforce that note under sections 673.3011 . . . Likewise, Wachovia could not have been entitled to enforce tire note under section 673.3011(2) as "a . . .

A. RODRIGUEZ v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. d b a s, 178 So. 3d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is 'wrongful possession of the instrument” § 673.3011 . . . the plain-, tiff has the rights of a .holder. §§ 671.201(21); 671.2011(1); 673.2031(1), (2), and (3); 673.3011 . . .

CQB, LLC, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a CWABS D. III,, 177 So. 3d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See §§ 673.3011(1), 673.2051(2), Fla. Stat. (2012); Kiefert v. Nationstar Mortg. . . .

L. KENNEY a k a v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As A N. a k a Ju o, 175 So. 3d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

J. ASSIL n k a v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, s, 171 So. 3d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . “[a] person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument .... ” § 673.3011 . . .

S. SNYDER v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,, 169 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2009), provides who may enforce a negotiable instrument, such as . . .

ST. CLAIR, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 173 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2014), a person entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument . . . Bank attempted to prove it had standing under section 673.3011(2) as a nonholder in possession of the . . . See § 673.3011(1). . . .

J. CREADON L. v. U. S. BANK N. A., 166 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . M & I Bank, 67 So.3d 1129, 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); see also § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . Section 673.3011 also provides that in certain circumstances a person not in possession of the instrument . . .

HAM, Jr. v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,, 164 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . might have been sufficient to prove that Aurora was entitled to enforce the instrument, under section 673.3011 . . .

GOREL FLCA LLC, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,, 165 So. 3d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2013), a person entitled to enforce the note and foreclose . . .

TILUS, A. v. AS MICHAI LLC,, 161 So. 3d 1284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .”); § 673.3011, Fla. . . .

SEFFAR, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., 160 So. 3d 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . had rights of enforcement pursuant to a Maryland statute that employs the same language as section 673.3011 . . .

MURRAY v. HSBC BANK USA,, 157 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . a holder and is entitled to enforce the terms of the Note and Mortgage, pursuant to Florida Statute 673.3011 . . . who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s[ection] 673.3091 or section] 673.4181(4).” § 673.3011 . . . HSBC did not qualify under section 673.3011(1) or (3). . . . HSBC was thus left to enforce the note under section 673.3011(2) as a non-holder in possession of the . . . had rights of enforcement pursuant to a Maryland statute that employs the same language as section 673.3011 . . .

JOSEPH, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,, 155 So. 3d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Although BAC argues that its predecessor, Taylor Bean, had standing under section 673.3011(2), Florida . . .

JAFFER v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,, 155 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2013), defines who may enforce a negotiable instrument and enforce . . . The last sentence of section 673.3011 makes it clear that possession of the instrument is more important . . . Chase attempted to allege entitlement to enforce the note under two statutory subsections: subsections 673.3011 . . . paid or accepted by mistake, in which case enforcement without possession is allowed under section 673.3011 . . . See §§ 673.3011(1) and (2), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . .

KIEFERT, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,, 153 So. 3d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 673.3011(2)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Mazine v. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 153 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2014)

. . . specificity the factual basis by which the claimant is a person entitled to enforce the note under section 673.3011 . . . It is also designed to conform to section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2013), except that part of section . . . 673.3011, Florida Statutes, which defines a person entitled to enforce an instrument under section 673.3091 . . .

PENNINGTON, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,, 151 So. 3d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . record contains no proof by Ocwen that it had standing under any of the means established by section 673.3011 . . .

S. LACOMBE P. v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,, 149 So. 3d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . contains no assertion or proof by Deutsche Bank of its standing under any means identified in section 673.3011 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. P. MORCOM, 125 So. 3d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . and “Plaintiff is now entitled to enforce Mortgage and Mortgage Note pursuant to Florida Statutes § 673.3011 . . . though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument. § 673.3011 . . . and “Plaintiff is now entitled to enforce Mortgage and Mortgage Note pursuant to Florida Statutes § 673.3011 . . . endorsed in blank with Appellant’s name stamped in the blank endorsement field, which, paired with section 673.3011 . . .

DIXON, v. EXPRESS EQUITY LENDING GROUP, LLLP,, 125 So. 3d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . A plaintiff may also establish standing by any means identified in section 673.3011, Florida Statutes . . .

STONE S v. BANKUNITED,, 115 So. 3d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . (citing § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2009)). . . .

W. HENDERSON, v. LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP,, 92 So. 3d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . to enforce a negotiable instrument such as a note is the “ ‘holder of the instrument.’ ” (quoting § 673.3011 . . .

W. MILLER M. v. KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION,, 91 So. 3d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 673.3011(2), Fla. Stat. (2011); Taylor v. . . .

In BALDERRAMA, P. v., 473 B.R. 823 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Florida Statute § 673.3011 defines the “person entitled to enforce” a negotiable instrument as: (1) The . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. L. KNIGHT, L. n k a A. N. A. S. M. D. P. A. LLC LLLP d b a LLC N. A. N. A., 90 So. 3d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . blank indorsement made Aurora Loan the “holder” of the note entitled to enforce it. §§ 673.2011(1), 673.3011 . . .

D. BEAUMONT, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,, 81 So. 3d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. . . . .

ISRA HOMES, INC. a LLC, a S. v. APPLEY V V a W. u t d LLC, a J. J. a A. A. E. S., 78 So. 3d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 673.3011 defines who may enforce an instrument: The term “person entitled to enforce” an instrument . . .

MAZINE E. v. M I BANK,, 67 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2009); Taylor v. Deutsche Bank Nat. . . .

In AUM SHREE OF TAMPA, LLC, d b a LLC, d b a v. HSBC USA, HSBC USA, v. LLC, d b a HSBC USA, v., 449 B.R. 584 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 673.3011 states: The term “person entitled to enforce” an instrument means: (1) the holder of the . . .

In BALDERRAMA, P. v., 451 B.R. 185 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 673.3011, and thus could foreclose on the mortgage, because it provided sufficient evidence of its . . .

HARVEY, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,, 69 So. 3d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . blank indorsement made Aurora Loan the “holder" of the note entitled to enforce it. §§ 673.2011(1), 673.3011 . . .

TAYLOR, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, ETC., 44 So. 3d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . We begin our consideration of this case with section 673.3011, Florida Statutes (2009). . . . Taylor, grants to MERS the status of a nonholder in possession as that position is defined by section 673.3011 . . .

A. RIGGS, Sr. v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC,, 36 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . §§ 673.2011(1), 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). There is no issue of authentication. . . .

JTM, INC. v. TOTALBANK,, 795 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .