Florida Statute 684.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 684.002

684.002 Applications for preliminary orders and conditions for granting preliminary orders.—

(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party may, without notice to any other party, make a request for an interim measure together with an application for a preliminary order prohibiting a party from frustrating the purpose of the interim measure requested.

(2) The arbitral tribunal may grant a preliminary order if it considers that prior disclosure of the request for the interim measure to the party against whom it is directed risks frustrating the purpose of the measure.

(3) The conditions described in s. 684.0019 apply to any preliminary order if the harm assessed under s. 684.0019(1)(a) is the harm likely to result from the order being granted or not granted.

History.—s. 21, ch. 2010-60.

F.S. 684.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.002 on Casetext

Amendments to 684.002

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 684.002

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 684.002.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.002

Total Results: 9

STEPHEN CHARLES FISCHER, as Trustee of the Dorothy L. Fischer Trust v. SUSAN ANN FISCHER, as Co-Trustee, etc. and SANDRA FISCHER FRASER, as Co-Trustee, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-12-22

Snippet: qualified as an expert. See Thellman, 557 So. 2d at 684. 2 Although the Statewide Uniform Guidelines were

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. McLeod

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-06-26

Citation: 15 So. 3d 682, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 2009 WL 1811554

Snippet: arising out of international relationships. See 684.02(1). See generally Robert M. Jarvis, International

JP Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-03-18

Citation: 6 So. 3d 681, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 2009 WL 691187

Snippet: accordance with § 701.02, Florida Statutes. *684 2. New Millennial is a subsequent purchaser for valuable

Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-06-16

Citation: 905 So. 2d 84, 2005 WL 1403993

Snippet: under an objective standard. See 754 So.2d at 684. [2] Judge Shevin in his well-articulated dissent

The Florida Bar v. Stupica

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-07-17

Citation: 300 So. 2d 683, 71 A.L.R. 3d 992

Snippet: STUPICA is not a member of the Florida Bar. *684 "2. THAT JOE L. STUPICA, d/b/a J. LAWRENCE PUBLICATIONS

Cravero v. Florida State Turnpike Authority

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-11-16

Citation: 91 So. 2d 312

Snippet: also Shavers v. Duval County, Fla. 1954, 73 So.2d 684; 2 Lewis on Eminent Domain, 3d Ed., Sec. 716, p. 1253;

MacQueen v. MacQueen

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-02-14

Citation: 179 So. 725, 131 Fla. 448, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1433

Snippet: Gildersleeve v. Gildersleeve, 88 Conn. 689, 92 Atl. Rep. 684; 2 Schouler on Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Domestic

Herron v. Passailaigue

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-10-27

Citation: 110 So. 539, 92 Fla. 818

Snippet: Gildersleeve v. Gildersleeve,88 Conn. 689, 92 Atl. Rep. 684; 2 Schouler on Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Domestic

Logan v. Slade & Etheredge

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1891-06-15

Citation: 28 Fla. 699

Snippet: Johns., 344; Bank of Utica vs. Smedes, 3 Cowen, 684; 2 Daniell’s Chancery Pl. & Pr., 1488, et seq. *716In