Florida Statute 684.0022 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 684.0022

684.0022 Modification, suspension, or termination; interim measure or preliminary order.—The arbitral tribunal may modify, suspend, or terminate an interim measure or a preliminary order it has granted upon application of any party or, in exceptional circumstances and upon prior notice to the parties, on the arbitral tribunal’s own initiative.

History.—s. 23, ch. 2010-60.

F.S. 684.0022 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.0022 on Casetext

Amendments to 684.0022

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 684.0022

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 684.0022.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.0022

Total Results: 6

GLORIA PATRICIA SANCHEZ and BODY & SOUL RETREAT, LLC. v. JOHANA CINQUE and VONCENT CINQUE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-14

Citation: 238 So. 3d 817

Snippet: In closing arguments, the plaintiff requested $2,684.22 for past medical expenses and $82,049 for future

Gordon v. Shield

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-14

Citation: 41 So. 3d 931, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10357, 2010 WL 2882443

Snippet: never made a demand to arbitrate under Fla. Stat. § 684.22(1); waited eleven months after learning suit had

Bland v. Green Acres Group, L.L.C.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-05-27

Citation: 12 So. 3d 822, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 2009 WL 1456948

Snippet: never made a demand to arbitrate under Fla. Stat. § 684.22(1); waited eleven months after learning suit had

Morton v. Polivchak

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-04-21

Citation: 931 So. 2d 935, 2006 WL 1041839

Snippet: a dispute to the arbitral panel" since section 684.22(1) specifically provides that the arbitral tribunal

Rintin Corp., SA v. Domar, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-08-16

Citation: 766 So. 2d 407, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10355, 2000 WL 1153156

Snippet: shall be for the arbitral tribunal to decide." § 684.22(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). Rintin's appeal follows

Wylly-Gabbett Co. v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 872

Snippet: rule in North Carolina. Bank v. Gilmer, 116 N. C. 684, 22 S. E. Rep. 2. and in Ohio it is held that under