688.009
Uniformity of application and construction.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1994–2009 · leading case: Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2006)
“” Fla. Stat. § 688.009 . 34 . Texas, where misappropriation of trade secrets is a common law tort based on the Restatement of Torts, § 757, also requires proof of damages.”
Coulter Corp. v. Leinert (1994)
“However, because UTSA was enacted in Florida to "be applied and constructed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this act among states enacting it," this Court will look to the interpretations of states with law similar to…”
Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc. (2009)
“2001) (finding the Eighth Circuit’s interpretation of Iowa’s UTSA “particularly applicable” because it was identical to Florida’s UTSA); see also Fla. Stat. § 688.009 (“Sections 688.001-688.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.