Florida Statute 698.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 698
CHATTEL MORTGAGES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 698.01

698.01 To be recorded.—No chattel mortgage shall be valid or effectual against creditors or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration and without notice unless it be recorded, or unless the property included in it be delivered to the mortgagee and continue to remain truly and bona fide in her or his possession.

History.—RS 1983; GS 2496; RGS 3833; CGL 5726; s. 779, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 698.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 698.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 698.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 698.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 698.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 698.01

Total Results: 8

Gardner v. Manor Care of Boca Raton, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-10

Citation: 831 So. 2d 676, 2002 WL 530977

Snippet: protected thought processes. Smith, 632 So.2d at 698.[1] While the facts in Smith are distinguishable in

Pahokee Housing v. South Florida Sanitation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-11-06

Citation: 478 So. 2d 1107, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2492, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16616

Snippet: operator's saving in tipping expenses, totalling only $8,698.[1] We would have no quarrel with this $8,698 deduction

Florida First Nat. Bank v. Dent

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-09-13

Citation: 350 So. 2d 481

Snippet: vice-president and attested by only one signature. Section 698.01, Florida Statutes (1969), did indeed require two

Merit Clothing Co. v. Lees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-02-12

Citation: 218 So. 2d 779, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6313

Snippet: MORTGAGE IS NOT RECORDED AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 698.01, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1965? The answer to each part

Austin v. Harden

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-04-19

Citation: 152 So. 2d 751, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3646

Snippet: Fla.App. 1962, 143 So.2d 551. Under Fla.Stat. § 698.01, F.S.A.,2 no chattel mortgage is valid as against

Richardson Tractor Company v. Square Deal MacHinery & Supply Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-02-06

Citation: 149 So. 2d 388

Snippet: against creditors or subsequent purchasers, Section 698.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The decision in Fritz

Donoghue v. Beeler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-02-27

Citation: 127 So. 2d 125

Snippet: mortgage. The appeal is from that decree. Section 698.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides as follows: "No chattel

Lee v. Bank of Georgia

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-09-30

Citation: 32 So. 2d 7, 159 Fla. 481, 13 A.L.R. 2d 1306, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 814

Snippet: state two recording statutes. The first is Section 698.01 Florida Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.) and is the