Florida Statute 710.122 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 710
TRANSFERS TO MINORS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 710.122

710.122 Accounting by and determination of liability of custodian.—

(1) A minor who has attained the age of 14 years, the minor’s guardian of the person or legal representative, an adult member of the minor’s family, a transferor, or a transferor’s legal representative may petition the court for an accounting by the custodian or the custodian’s legal representative or for a determination of responsibility, as between the custodial property and the custodian personally, for claims against the custodial property unless the responsibility has been adjudicated in an action under s. 710.119 to which the minor or the minor’s legal representative was a party.

(2) A successor custodian may petition the court for an accounting by the predecessor custodian.

(3) The court, in a proceeding under this act or in any other proceeding, may require or permit the custodian or the custodian’s legal representative to account.

(4) If a custodian is removed under s. 710.121(6), the court shall require an accounting and order delivery of the custodial property and records to the successor custodian and the execution of all instruments required for transfer of the custodial property.

History.—s. 1, ch. 85-95.

F.S. 710.122 on Google Scholar

F.S. 710.122 on Casetext

Amendments to 710.122

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 710.122

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 710.122.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 710.122

Total Results: 20

Scott v. Williams

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-01-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 107 So. 3d 379, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 25, 55 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2267, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 65, 2013 WL 173955

Snippet: control.” State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, 231 (1929). Thus, our ruling today expresses

In Re Estate of O'Keefe

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-08-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 833 So. 2d 157

Snippet: Berard Constr. Co. v. Mun. Court, 49 Cal.App.3d 710, 122 Cal.Rptr. 825, 832 (1975) (concluding that contractual

Knight v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-01-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 808 So. 2d 210

Snippet: See also State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, 233 (1929) (holding that ambiguous terms

Hubbard v. Cazares

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-12-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 413 So. 2d 1192

Snippet: Los Angeles Judicial District, 49 Cal. App.3d 710, 122 Cal. Rptr. 825 (Ct.App. 1975). In that case the

Pearl v. Fla. Bd. of Real Estate

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-02-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 394 So. 2d 189

Snippet: practices, State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225 (1929); Reid v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Florida Bar v. Brumbaugh

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-01-09T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 355 So. 2d 1186

Snippet: 394 (1936); State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225 (1929). Our decision also affects respondent

Florida Real Estate Commission v. McGregor

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-07-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 336 So. 2d 1156

Snippet: Appellant cites State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225 (1929), as dispositive of the issue because

Telophase Soc. of Fla., Inc. v. STATE BD. OF FUN. D. & E.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-06-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 334 So. 2d 563

Snippet: 48 (1933); State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225 (1929). Also see, Carbo, Inc. v. Meiklejohn

Cornwell v. University of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-01-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 307 So. 2d 203

Snippet: .2nd 1969; State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1929; Adams v. Board of Public

World Fair Freaks and Attractions, Inc. v. Hodges

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1972-10-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 267 So. 2d 817

Snippet: footnote 1. [3] State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225 (1929); State ex rel. Fulton v. Ives,

Florida Real Estate Commission v. Williams

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1970-09-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 240 So. 2d 304

Snippet: polestar case (State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225) concerned with the precursor of the statute

Williams v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-01-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 232 So. 2d 239, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6793

Snippet: See State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 1929, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, wherein the predecessor statute was discussed

State ex rel. Corbett v. Churchwell

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1968-10-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 215 So. 2d 302

Snippet: unqualified. State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225 (1929); Holland v. Florida Real Estate

Burke v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-07-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 213 So. 2d 40

Snippet: police power (State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, 230-231) and therefore is not a denial

Williams v. Ferrentino

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-06-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 2d 504

Snippet: 763; State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 1929, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225. But cf. City of Miami Beach v. State

Reid v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 188 So. 2d 846

Snippet: in State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 1929, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, text 239, said: "The purpose of

Horne v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-04-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 163 So. 2d 515, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4204

Snippet: dissents. . See State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, 230 (1929). . Holland v. Florida Real

Hargis v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 153 So. 2d 836

Snippet: in State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 1929, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225, where our Supreme Court, in passing upon

State Ex Rel. Ervin v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1962-03-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 139 So. 2d 135

Snippet: So. 929; State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225. Chapter 349, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Moore v. Thompson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1960-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 126 So. 2d 543

Snippet: statute, State ex rel. Davis v. Rose, 1929, 97 Fla. 710, 122 So. 225; and that it is the duty of the courts