Florida Statute 714.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 714
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE RECEIVERSHIP ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 714.24

714.24 Receivership in another state; ancillary proceeding.—

(1) The court may appoint a receiver appointed in another state, or that person’s nominee, as an ancillary receiver with respect to property located in this state or subject to the jurisdiction of the court for which a receiver could be appointed under this chapter, if:

(a) The person or nominee would be eligible to serve as receiver under s. 714.07; and

(b) The appointment furthers the person’s possession, custody, control, or disposition of property subject to the receivership in the other state.

(2) The court may issue an order that gives effect to an order entered in another state appointing or directing a receiver.

(3) Unless the court orders otherwise, an ancillary receiver appointed under subsection (1) has the rights, powers, and duties of a receiver appointed under this chapter.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2020-106.

F.S. 714.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 714.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 714.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 714.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 714.24.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 714.24

Total Results: 20

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. Jones

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-17

Citation: 227 So. 3d 150, 2017 WL 2180984, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6958

Snippet: from the rigid rule of Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714[, 24 L.Ed. 565] [ (1877) ], to the flexible standard

In Re Guardianship of Graham

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-08-01

Citation: 963 So. 2d 275, 2007 WL 2189111

Snippet: for rehearing cites to Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877), and Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U

Durkee v. Durkee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-06-29

Citation: 906 So. 2d 1176, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10104, 2005 WL 1523306

Snippet: the state); Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 (5 Otto) U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877). Thus, had Mr. Garrett been served

Springbrook Commons, Ltd. v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-06-28

Citation: 761 So. 2d 1192, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8078, 2000 WL 827322

Snippet: person of the defendant. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877); Bedford Computer Corp., 484 So

Garrett v. Garrett

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-29

Citation: 668 So. 2d 991, 1996 WL 84244

Snippet: the state); Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 (5 Otto) U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877). Thus, had Mr. Garrett been served

Zieman v. Cosio

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-02

Citation: 578 So. 2d 332, 1991 WL 45202

Snippet: 3d DCA 1958) (citing Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877)). It was within the court's power

Hordis Bros., Inc. v. Sentinel Holdings, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-04-24

Citation: 562 So. 2d 715, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2867, 1990 WL 49827

Snippet: jurisdictional theory embodied in Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1878), overruled in part, Shaffer v

Mouzon v. Mouzon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-11-01

Citation: 458 So. 2d 381

Snippet: 58 L.Ed. 854 (1914); Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1878). [6] See Goldey v. Morning News

Phoenix Trimming, Inc. v. Mowday

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-04-27

Citation: 431 So. 2d 198

Snippet: historical developments since Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877), which have led to the present

A.J. Spagnol Lumber Co. v. Trauger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-01

Citation: 423 So. 2d 956, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22189

Snippet: without jurisdiction, Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565; D’Arcy v. Ketchum, [52 U.S.] 11 How

Wiggins v. Dojcsan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-02-12

Citation: 411 So. 2d 894

Snippet: 61 L.Ed. 713 (1917), Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877); Burkhart v. Circuit Court of

Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum MacHine Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-01-08

Citation: 392 So. 2d 1305, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2545

Snippet: L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958); Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877). The principle underlying the

Porter v. Nettles

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-06-14

Citation: 346 So. 2d 1235, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22439

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1878); Parish Mortgage Corporation v

Storer v. Storer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-04-07

Citation: 346 So. 2d 994

Snippet: greatly expanded since Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877) which held that personal jurisdiction

Pinebrook v. Pinebrook

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-03-26

Citation: 329 So. 2d 343

Snippet: greatly expanded since Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877) which held that personal jurisdiction

Shannon v. Great Southern Equipment Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-01-16

Citation: 326 So. 2d 19, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14223

Snippet: D.Fla.1975). . See Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877). . (Fla.App.2d, 1975), 318 So

Griffin v. Zinn

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-08-08

Citation: 318 So. 2d 151

Snippet: GRIMES, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] (1877), 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565. [2] Section 48.193, F.S. 1973. [3]

Caizza v. Caizza

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-03-13

Citation: 291 So. 2d 569

Snippet: the several states. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877); Williams v. North Carolina, 317

Horace v. American National Bank and Trust Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-08-03

Citation: 251 So. 2d 33

Snippet: away from the rule of Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877), established a new test: "* *

T. J. K. v. N. B.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-07-17

Citation: 237 So. 2d 592

Snippet: of Pennoyer v. Neff, 1878, 5 Otto 714, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565, it has been accepted as axiomatic that