Florida Statute 715.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 715
PROPERTY: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 715.02

715.02 Prohibiting recovery from seller of forfeited deposit or down payment made by check, draft, or obligation refused through no fault of seller.—In any action by any person against the seller of real property for any share of a forfeited deposit or down payment by a prospective purchaser, no check, draft, or other obligation of such prospective purchaser shall be construed to be a deposit and the action shall not be maintained by any person against the seller by reason thereof, if payment of said check, draft, or obligation is refused through no fault of the seller, notwithstanding any recitation of a receipt of said deposit in any written agreement.

History.—s. 1, ch. 24304, 1947; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949.

F.S. 715.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 715.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 715.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 715.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 715.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 715.02

Total Results: 13

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Heather Lanham

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-18

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1115

Snippet: “assignee” under section 559.715. 2 [t]he Legislature, of course

Ramos v. Cach, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-31

Citation: 183 So. 3d 1149, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19521, 2015 WL 9491850

Snippet: Collection Practices Act (“FCCPA”).1 See §§ 559.715;2 559.72,3 Fla. Stat. (2010). Because no private cause

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-11-20

Snippet: this chapter shall prevail." While section 944.715(2), Florida Statutes, sets forth powers that may not

Halliburton Co. v. Eastern Cement Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-13

Citation: 672 So. 2d 844, 1996 WL 93682

Snippet: proximately resulting from any breach of warranty." § 672.715(2), Fla.Stat. (1995). As the leading text on the UCC

Weinstock v. Groth

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-01

Citation: 659 So. 2d 713, 1995 WL 516436

Snippet: admissions, numbers 1, 2 and 3, of January 12, 1995. *715 (2) denied Weinstock's motion for protective order

Koplowitz v. Girard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-09

Citation: 658 So. 2d 1183, 1995 WL 467828

Snippet: 2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla. Stat. (1993). In Storchwerke, Gmbh v. Mr.

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-11

Citation: 610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

Snippet: award of consequential damages under section 672.715(2)(a), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, those portions

Pan American Stone Co. v. Meister

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-06-15

Citation: 527 So. 2d 275, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1413, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513, 1988 WL 59436

Snippet: proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.” § 672.715(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We reverse and remand for a

Bair v. AEGIS CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-23

Citation: 523 So. 2d 1186, 1988 WL 24165

Snippet: same U.C.C. provision as adopted under section 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1985)[3]). While from the limited

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-28

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1105

Snippet: of warranty." Section 672.715(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.715(2)(b)). Thus, the reasonable

Miles v. Kavanaugh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-09-27

Citation: 350 So. 2d 1090, 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 911

Snippet: the breach of warranty. Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council Bros., Inc. v

Williams v. Crocker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-06-15

Citation: 36 Fla. 61

Snippet: Rep. 252; Still vs. Focke & Wilkins, 66 Texas, 715, 2 S. W. Rep. 59; Donoho vs. Fish Bros. & Co., 58

Hopkins v. Burney

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1848-01-15

Citation: 2 Fla. 42

Snippet: Seymour vs. Billings, 12 Wendell, 286. 1 Stark. Ev. 715. 2 Leigh's Nisi Prius, 1330. Bemus vs. Beekman, 3