Syfert Injury Law Firm

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Heather Lanham

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: “assignee” under section 559.715. 2 [t]he Legislature, of course

Ramos v. Cach, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 183 So. 3d 1149, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19521, 2015 WL 9491850

Snippet: Collection Practices Act (“FCCPA”).1 See §§ 559.715;2 559.72,3 Fla. Stat. (2010). Because no private cause

US Acquisition, LLC v. Tabas, Freedman, Soloff, Miller & Brown, P.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-05-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 87 So. 3d 1229, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8261, 2012 WL 1859514

Snippet: determining attorney’s fees and costs (Case No. 4D11-715). These two separate appeals were previously consolidated

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1998-11-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: chapter shall prevail." While section 944.715(2), Florida Statutes, sets forth powers that may not

Halliburton Co. v. Eastern Cement Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-05-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 672 So. 2d 844

Snippet: resulting from any breach of warranty." § 672.715(2), Fla.Stat. (1995). As the leading text on the UCC…breach of warranty" permitted by section 672.715(2)(b), for there is no possible claim here for injury

Weinstock v. Groth

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-09-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 659 So. 2d 713

Snippet: admissions, numbers 1, 2 and 3, of January 12, 1995. *715 (2) denied Weinstock's motion for protective order

Koplowitz v. Girard

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-08-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 658 So. 2d 1183

Snippet: .2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla. Stat. (1993). In Storchwerke, Gmbh v. Mr.

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-12-10T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 610 So. 2d 597

Snippet: award of consequential damages under section 672.715(2)(a), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, those portions

Pan American Stone Co. v. Meister

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-06-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 527 So. 2d 275, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1413, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513, 1988 WL 59436

Snippet: proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.” § 672.715(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We reverse and remand for a

Bair v. AEGIS CORP.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-03-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 523 So. 2d 1186

Snippet: same U.C.C. provision as adopted under section 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1985)[3]). While from the limited…of section 672.608. [3] Pursuant to section 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1985), consequential damages

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1105

Snippet: warranty." Section 672.715(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.715(2)(b)). Thus, the reasonable

Miles v. Kavanaugh

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1977-09-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 350 So. 2d 1090

Snippet: the breach of warranty. Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council Bros., Inc. v

Young v. Young

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1943-04-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 12 So. 2d 885, 152 Fla. 712, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1013

Snippet: interrupted the latter day. Thus the requisite *Page 715 two years of 365 days each and one year of 366 days

Williams v. Crocker

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1895-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 36 Fla. 61

Snippet: . 252; Still vs. Focke & Wilkins, 66 Texas, 715, 2 S. W. Rep. 59; Donoho vs. Fish Bros. & Co.,

Hopkins v. Burney

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1848-01-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 2 Fla. 42

Snippet: Seymour vs. Billings, 12 Wendell, 286. 1 Stark. Ev. 715. 2 Leigh's Nisi Prius, 1330. Bemus vs. Beekman