Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 717.104 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 717.104 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 717.104

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 717
DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 717.104
717.104 Traveler’s checks and money orders.
(1) Subject to subsection (4), any sum payable on a traveler’s check that has been outstanding for more than 15 years after its issuance is presumed unclaimed unless the owner, within 15 years, has communicated in writing with the issuer concerning it or otherwise indicated an interest as evidenced by a memorandum or other record on file with the issuer.
(2) Subject to subsection (4), any sum payable on a money order or similar written instrument, other than a third party bank check, that has been outstanding for more than 7 years after its issuance is presumed unclaimed unless the owner, within 7 years, has communicated in writing with the issuer concerning it or otherwise indicated an interest as evidenced by a memorandum or other record on file with the issuer.
(3) No holder may deduct from the amount of any traveler’s check or money order any charges imposed by reason of the failure to present those instruments for payment unless there is a valid and enforceable written contract between the issuer and the owner of the property pursuant to which the issuer may impose those charges and the issuer regularly imposes those charges and does not regularly reverse or otherwise cancel those charges with respect to the property.
(4) No sum payable on a traveler’s check, money order, or similar written instrument, other than a third party bank check, described in subsections (1) and (2) may be subjected to the custody of this state as unclaimed property unless:
(a) The records of the issuer show that the traveler’s check, money order, or similar written instrument was purchased in this state;
(b) The issuer has its principal place of business in this state and the records of the issuer do not show the state in which the traveler’s check, money order, or similar written instrument was purchased; or
(c) The issuer has its principal place of business in this state; the records of the issuer show the state in which the traveler’s check, money order, or similar written instrument was purchased; and the laws of the state of purchase do not provide for the escheat or custodial taking of the property, or its escheat or unclaimed property law is not applicable to the property.
(5) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, subsection (4) applies to sums payable on traveler’s checks, money orders, and similar written instruments presumed unclaimed on or after February 1, 1965, except to the extent that those sums have been paid over to a state prior to January 1, 1974.
History.s. 5, ch. 87-105; s. 5, ch. 2001-36.

F.S. 717.104 on Google Scholar

F.S. 717.104 on Casetext

Amendments to 717.104


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 717.104
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 717.104.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 717.104

Total Results: 4

Choice Plus, LLC v. Department of Financial Services, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-17

Citation: 244 So. 3d 343

Snippet: expiration of a dormancy period. See, e.g., § 717.104, Fla. Stat. (2013) (outstanding traveler’s checks

State of Florida v. Jeffery D. Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-01-14

Citation: 184 So. 3d 1205

Snippet: circumstances).” United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705, 717, 104 S.Ct. 3296, 82 L.Ed.2d 530 (1984). To defeat the

State Department of Environmental Protection v. Allied Scrap Processors, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-11

Citation: 724 So. 2d 151, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15616, 1998 WL 852448

Snippet: Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. R.A. Gray, & Co. 467 U.S. 717, 104 S.Ct. 2709, 81 L.Ed.2d 601 (1984). They have held

City of Key West v. RLJS CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-01-03

Citation: 537 So. 2d 641, 1989 WL 135

Snippet: Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. R.A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717, 104 S.Ct. 2709, 81 L.Ed.2d 601 (1984), the Court rejected